Re: SINFLUENCERS

(Anonymous) 2025-02-13 08:07 pm (UTC)(link)
this whole situation sucks :( but ty anon we will try

Re: SINFLUENCERS

(Anonymous) 2025-02-13 09:08 pm (UTC)(link)
I do hope that those of you who are stuck dealing with this can find a better game, or at least find somewhere that would appreciate your time and effort in anything.

It sucks so much that everyone else is suffering while the head-mod boomerangs one of their friends and ignores the others around that are stuck having to wait. At this point? I would not wish it on anyone. Not all games are perfect, but that doesn't mean that people should be prevented from having their fun in events, the tdm, wherever in the game thanks to that negligence on the head-mod's part with seemingly ghosting their co-mods.

It's depressing to me, truly. Why go so far to make a game allegedly over not making a reserve in time, and then stop giving effort after the game started gaining more traction due to interest being there in the premise? That is if that was a leading factor, I don't know the reasons behind it and can only guess myself.

Re: SINFLUENCERS

(Anonymous) 2025-02-13 09:26 pm (UTC)(link)
there are so few sex games with open slots or open apps these days.

when will the drought for the thirsty end.

Re: SINFLUENCERS

(Anonymous) 2025-02-13 10:05 pm (UTC)(link)
looks at rpa's ad threads and bakerstreet

probably never, there's simply nowhere to find smut threads

Re: SINFLUENCERS

(Anonymous) 2025-02-13 10:08 pm (UTC)(link)
... anon, they want a game. Not PSLs or memes.

Re: SINFLUENCERS

(Anonymous) 2025-02-13 10:16 pm (UTC)(link)
nobody who plays in sex games wants a game specifically, they want a menu of kinks they can have their character engage in that are served to them on a silver platter with a card that says "you don't have to feel weird about this because the game mechanics make it okay, and don't worry, the mod will do all the thinking required"

Re: SINFLUENCERS

(Anonymous) 2025-02-13 10:22 pm (UTC)(link)
So... a game. because if you take out the sex bits? You basically described how some folks treat games.

Re: SINFLUENCERS

(Anonymous) 2025-02-14 12:14 am (UTC)(link)
have you never been in a game before because that is how most people treat games

Re: SINFLUENCERS

(Anonymous) 2025-02-14 12:48 am (UTC)(link)
am i to understand that you dislike games

Re: SINFLUENCERS

(Anonymous) 2025-02-14 01:04 am (UTC)(link)
Must be a weird “gen only” that got lost…

Re: SINFLUENCERS

(Anonymous) 2025-02-14 03:10 am (UTC)(link)
dead on. everyone who doesn't play in sex games is a puritan.

Re: SINFLUENCERS

(Anonymous) 2025-02-14 03:43 am (UTC)(link)
No, but you sure sound like one

Re: SINFLUENCERS

(Anonymous) 2025-02-14 03:46 am (UTC)(link)
please explain why you felt persecuted

Re: SINFLUENCERS

(Anonymous) 2025-02-14 02:06 am (UTC)(link)
you need a nap and a good lay

Re: SINFLUENCERS

(Anonymous) 2025-02-14 03:09 am (UTC)(link)
i'm good, but i apologize for saying something true that you didn't like

Re: SINFLUENCERS

(Anonymous) 2025-02-13 10:27 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't know why we're assuming there actually are co-mods. surely they would've at least been able to do list updates and comm sweeps? it seems more like an announcement made to take the heat off while no one was actually brought on.

Re: SINFLUENCERS

(Anonymous) 2025-02-13 11:06 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm mainly assuming they were picked but then got ghosted before they were allowed to do anything at all. Announced as being brought on then they're ghosted before getting access to anything.

Which either way to me is ridiculous of the head mod to do. With or without the co-mods being actual people, it's not a good look to me if nobody including the head mod is doing actual work on the comm. So their excuse and attempt at taking heat off, if it is one, makes it worse.