Re: da

(Anonymous) 2025-02-14 02:21 pm (UTC)(link)
i meant

it should and it is

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2025-02-14 02:49 pm (UTC)(link)
ia. in this case we know who the mod is because they've slipped up but messaging someone because you suspect they're an anon mod? yeah, don't do that. that's shitty.

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2025-02-14 05:47 pm (UTC)(link)
yeah, normally don’t do this, but in this case the mod slipped up so there are people who can confirm they are the mod and they’re supposedly “mia” even though they were threading a little over a week ago.

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2025-02-14 05:52 pm (UTC)(link)
what a strange way to ruin your own reputation

how hard can it be to say "hey, sorry i dropped the ball, the new mods have it now," give them what they need, and go back to tagging with no responsibilities

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2025-02-14 06:04 pm (UTC)(link)
tbqh i don't think she cares about her reputation. it isn't hard to make a new username and handle.

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2025-02-14 06:00 pm (UTC)(link)
even if we know who they are don't reach out to them. i'm pretty sure they and their friends watch rpa and wg so they've seen all of this. they know what people are saying, i wouldn't be surprised if she's staying quiet out of spite at this point and plans to come back in a week or month.

just drop the game and find another one, there's nothing that can be done.

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2025-02-14 06:39 pm (UTC)(link)
wouldn’t be surprised if that happens tbqh and then there will be a flood of comments about how everyone here was the reason they stayed away along with another irl issue

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2025-02-14 07:00 pm (UTC)(link)
has anyone capped their anonfail or shared deets?

ngl i haven't been able to find them across multiple threads, and i feel a bit uncomfortable with the fact that we seem to be going with 'trust me, bro' on this.

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2025-02-14 07:09 pm (UTC)(link)
afaik it hasn't been posted here or on rpa. i have seen the proof but it's up to the person who took the cap to decide if they want to share it in public, but they probably won't and i don't even think they go to wg or rpa

what you can do is check the tdm writing against the player's writing, compare how she talks ooc against how the mod talks. she didn't try that hard to hide. it is her but you likely aren't going to get hard confirmation unless the people who caught it want to go public with it

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2025-02-14 07:13 pm (UTC)(link)
appreciate what you're saying, but you have to admit your comment also boils down to 'it's her, trust me, bro.'

idk her from Jesus, i'm not even in the game, but i just find it incredibly weird there's an entire witch hunt in this thread for a person no one has produced deets to reveal as the mod.

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2025-02-14 07:21 pm (UTC)(link)
oh yeah, i agree with you. i think this thread is a mix of people who know and people who don't. clearly more than one person has seen the caps cause i haven't responded to this thread until today.

i have opinions on other stuff people have said but i think there's no point in this. she's not going to change and she's not going to admit it's her. people should drop the game and move on if they're unhappy. there's not likely to be a satisfying resolution here.

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2025-02-14 07:28 pm (UTC)(link)
if more than one person has seen the caps, wouldn't that make it harder to identify your friend? unless your friend was the source for everyone who has seen the caps in this thread, ig.

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2025-02-14 19:31 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2025-02-14 19:34 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2025-02-14 19:40 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2025-02-14 19:48 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2025-02-14 20:27 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2025-02-14 20:39 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2025-02-14 20:54 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2025-02-15 00:55 (UTC) - Expand

dda

(Anonymous) - 2025-02-15 02:54 (UTC) - Expand

+1

(Anonymous) - 2025-02-15 02:58 (UTC) - Expand

+1

(Anonymous) - 2025-02-15 03:24 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2025-02-15 08:06 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2025-02-15 18:41 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2025-02-14 07:16 pm (UTC)(link)
and there’s also the point that logos has not made ac since joining the game and was even late with posting a comment about a hiatus iirc

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2025-02-14 07:11 pm (UTC)(link)
idk if anyone else would be willing to share it because a fellow player showed me when she anonfailed in reply to their question, so it would out whoever is sharing.

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2025-02-14 07:15 pm (UTC)(link)
so we have a game thread of 86 comments and no deets?

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2025-02-14 09:42 pm (UTC)(link)
a game being abandoned is still deets

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2025-02-14 09:56 pm (UTC)(link)
except most of this thread is about pointing fingers at a person we have no proof even is the mod.

this was the exact thing that happened with the ton, a bunch of anons claiming trust us, the chat caps are soooooo bad and the stuff that goes on in the game discord is terrible but we can't share any caps, just trust us.

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2025-02-14 22:03 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2025-02-14 22:49 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2025-02-14 22:53 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2025-02-14 22:57 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2025-02-14 23:14 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2025-02-14 23:16 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2025-02-15 03:57 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2025-02-15 05:48 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2025-02-15 05:52 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2025-02-14 22:58 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2025-02-15 02:55 am (UTC)(link)
https://ibb.co/pv2dwb25

the source of the cap said they don't really care if it's shared since they've idled out of the game so hyg, anon. even though this will probably initiate another witch hunt for the person who leaked it especially among c's hyperaggressive whiteknights.

so, can we now go back to the actual issue of the mod abandoning the game twice?

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2025-02-15 03:56 am (UTC)(link)
Thanks babe. Shock shock, people were being honest.

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2025-02-15 06:44 pm (UTC)(link)
listen, it was MUCH more likely that there was a secret conspiracy to fuck up one person in particular because reasons or something. no one could have predicted this!

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2025-02-15 19:08 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2025-02-15 23:48 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2025-02-16 01:21 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2025-02-15 05:41 am (UTC)(link)
please stop deluding yourselves into thinking that everyone who asks for hard deets is a whiteknight, i am so sick of that shit

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2025-02-15 05:45 am (UTC)(link)
the ones i'm referring to her whiteknights are the ones who were calling people lacking empathy last time when they're just being rational about their concerns

unless you're one of those, anon

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2025-02-15 05:46 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2025-02-15 05:51 (UTC) - Expand

ayrt

(Anonymous) 2025-02-15 08:11 am (UTC)(link)
thank you. finally someone actually provides proof.

your friend will be fine, there is not much that the aventurine player can say or do when they're caught this red handed.

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2025-02-15 06:47 pm (UTC)(link)
this is why people should learn to use multi-account containers in their browsers. or just an all together different browser for their anon stuff

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2025-02-15 06:56 pm (UTC)(link)
nah, people who don't have enough consideration to take the very easy step of handing the game off to willing new mods should out themselves

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2025-02-15 19:13 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2025-02-15 19:32 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2025-02-15 19:46 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2025-02-15 23:07 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2025-02-16 01:03 (UTC) - Expand