Ryan Gosling (
ryanongosling) wrote in
wankgate2025-02-08 11:45 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
253: abandon me harder daddy

Please mark any spoilers clearly and try not to spoil stuff that hasn't even aired yet for people.
Keep the rules in mind.
LATEST PAGE | LATEST FLATVIEW PAGE
Game Hate | Canon Hate | Namedropping | Mods' Pet Peeves | Game Pet Peeves | Plurk Pet Peeves | Meme Pet Peeves
Report stupid shit here.
Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK
(Anonymous) 2025-04-02 06:35 pm (UTC)(link)Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK
(Anonymous) 2025-04-02 10:18 pm (UTC)(link)my hot take is people who write in third-person novel prose are way bigger freaks in dwrp than ecats-ers anyway
Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK
(Anonymous) 2025-04-02 10:56 pm (UTC)(link)idk about anyone else but i'm here to roleplay, which means actually playing things out. give me an ecats-er who will actually finish threads over someone who writes multiple paragraphs and takes forever to tag back any day.
Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK
(Anonymous) 2025-04-02 11:04 pm (UTC)(link)Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK
(Anonymous) 2025-04-03 05:28 am (UTC)(link)quantity, baby
Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK
(Anonymous) 2025-04-03 08:19 am (UTC)(link)so maybe they are having more fun
considering more people are tagging them repeatedly
Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK
(Anonymous) 2025-04-03 06:03 pm (UTC)(link)some of their tags are only a sentence. one single sentence. i would hope that'd get quicker, boomerang play and more total tags than something longer because there's not much to each tag.
and fwiw, they had 6 tag-ins. that's pretty average looking at the amount of tag-ins most top levels across the tdm have received.
Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK
(Anonymous) 2025-04-03 06:42 pm (UTC)(link)Quick glance at the offending thread and i do feel a decent voice off this character. Sometimes that's all you need.
Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK
(Anonymous) 2025-04-03 07:23 pm (UTC)(link)Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK
(Anonymous) 2025-04-03 07:42 pm (UTC)(link)Half their tags aren't even full sentences.
Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK
(Anonymous) 2025-04-03 08:11 pm (UTC)(link)I get that it's not to everyone's taste and that's fine, but it looks like some can play off this style and enjoy doing so. I'd just avoid them if they get in, no harm no foul.
Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK
(Anonymous) 2025-04-03 08:35 pm (UTC)(link)you know
third-person ""novel"" rpers are the weirdos compared to this, apparently
Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK
(Anonymous) 2025-04-03 09:00 pm (UTC)(link)someone said the players were 'enabling' the ecats tags and people are pointing out that it is not enabling, they are enjoying them
some people enjoy long tags, some people are cool with these, and both are long-standing styles of rp
no one's dissing longform rp
Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK
(Anonymous) 2025-04-03 09:06 pm (UTC)(link)Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK
(Anonymous) 2025-04-03 09:23 pm (UTC)(link)Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK
(Anonymous) 2025-04-04 04:29 am (UTC)(link)i consider it weird is because if i wanted third-person narrative writing i would just, you know, write. dwrp isn't really a "writing" hobby to me the way people like to talk about it here. writing is involved sure but the focus on my end is more engaging with my partners in what is essentially just improv situations. this is a collaborative roleplay hobby so i'm here to play off of other people in a back-and-forth dialog more than anything. third person novel narration is for forums and fanfic, but I have to assume a handful of these (newer) folks came from tumblr or something.
obviously people can do whatever they want and i'm not really here to judge them for it. i just think it's weird and it's out of place in a way commentspam isn't when most of everyone else is doing action tags/brackets type standard to journal rp.
Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK
(Anonymous) 2025-04-04 12:19 am (UTC)(link)maybe i'm the one who misread those anons' intent. i would disagree with the sentiment anyway; it isn't anyone else's responsibility but a prospective player themselves to read up on the game they want to join. it's also completely possible they have samples ready from somewhere else that aren't in ecats style so all this doesn't even matter
if it's a known thing that these mods aren't strict then nvm
Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK
(Anonymous) 2025-04-04 12:59 am (UTC)(link)bc this is wg and not rpa to say "shame on them" sounds like the problem is with bothering to tag them back imo but maybe that's me being negative
nayrt
(Anonymous) 2025-04-04 04:33 am (UTC)(link)thinking "shame on them for enabling that" to mean anything but "shame on the taggers for letting this person continue to thread in a way that doesn't conform to everyone else here" is kind of wild tbh
Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK
(Anonymous) 2025-04-03 07:26 pm (UTC)(link)