(Anonymous) 2025-05-06 02:31 am (UTC)(link)
goes to show just how bad some of these jayces really are that this one is considered decent, when the player is so anti-mel they consider s1 jayce's canon relationship with mel to be comphet manipulation for political reasons because icky vagina.

(Anonymous) 2025-05-06 02:42 am (UTC)(link)
sources or you're making this up

i can't imagine caring this much about what other people choose to rp ships wise

(Anonymous) 2025-05-06 02:48 am (UTC)(link)
this is an arcane thread on wg. how are you genuinely surprised there's gossip in it

(Anonymous) 2025-05-06 02:51 am (UTC)(link)
source is their own plurk linking to discourse on the subject and stating their opinions on it. i'm not the anon that namedropped them but they're in my game and i'm familiar enough with arcane that their take made me go "wait, what" when i saw it.

(Anonymous) 2025-05-06 09:38 am (UTC)(link)
curious and had time, got them on plurk for the same game so i went looking for it

and there is nothing lmao

the most i found in yaoihound plurks for jayvik specifically when it was still fresh hype are comments abt the first kiss they shared that jayce was awkward abt, then something about politics in general misguiding jayce right after but most of these comments are just harmless yaoi lense. later plurks state they like mel.

they mention they're good with mel in their permissions. mel mention in the recent plot post.

i think you're just mad. and if it bothers you that much go to their hmd

(Anonymous) 2025-05-06 12:26 pm (UTC)(link)
did not participate in the thread but that tracks

it's usually fucking nothing when anons bug out upon being asked for deets instead of just dropping the paste. everyone would know instantly how wildly they are exaggerating or grudging

(Anonymous) 2025-05-06 12:49 pm (UTC)(link)
this is so cringe

go do your tags

(Anonymous) 2025-05-06 12:56 pm (UTC)(link)
lol

didn't like that huh

(Anonymous) 2025-05-06 01:16 pm (UTC)(link)
lol

assuming only the people you're involved in a handflapping contest with could think you're cringe huh

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-06 13:22 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-06 14:38 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2025-05-06 07:13 pm (UTC)(link)
you know whats even more cringe? making shit up

(Anonymous) 2025-05-06 12:59 pm (UTC)(link)
i don't know why you're all fixated on dragging this boring nothingburger jayce but legit shit tier viktors are given free passes.

(Anonymous) 2025-05-06 01:05 pm (UTC)(link)
this is dwrp. you already know why people give the white guy character a free pass no matter how shit tier they may be.

(Anonymous) 2025-05-06 01:09 pm (UTC)(link)
sad but true

(Anonymous) 2025-05-06 01:26 pm (UTC)(link)
Yep. POC characters always get held to higher standards and receive more scrutiny.

(Anonymous) 2025-05-06 01:40 pm (UTC)(link)
well the thread was about jayce but if you have something to say about shitty viktors please go ahead

(Anonymous) 2025-05-06 02:55 am (UTC)(link)
You must be new to the internet and fandom at large if you think a yaiohound hating their blorbo's canon het ship is in any way unbelievable. Or if you don't understand why some of us side eye that behavior.

(Anonymous) 2025-05-06 03:03 am (UTC)(link)
no i'm not new to the internet but i thought dwrp let this shit behind years ago. seriously who cares? don't rp with them. if it's so egregious to their characterization report them to the mods. but i'm going to guess no mod gives a shit because this is such a ymmv

(Anonymous) 2025-05-06 03:18 am (UTC)(link)
sorry your pal got namedropped on wg

(Anonymous) 2025-05-06 03:20 am (UTC)(link)
they are not my pal

when you make an accusation the burden of evidence is on you

deet it or beat it is a wankgate maxim

(Anonymous) 2025-05-06 03:05 am (UTC)(link)
oh no won't someone think of the canon straight ships

(Anonymous) 2025-05-06 03:12 am (UTC)(link)
disliking misogyny is not the same as pearl clutching over the poor oppressed hets but we get it, logic is not your strong suit.

(Anonymous) 2025-05-06 03:14 am (UTC)(link)
for it to be misogyny i need to see the misogyny

there are many reasons why someone might not want to rp m/f and not all of them are 'icky vagina'

right now all i have is 'dude trust me' from an anon with a clear bias

(Anonymous) 2025-05-06 03:28 am (UTC)(link)
from the frothing I'm assuming this is either them or one of their buddies tbh. there's a lot of handflapping going on wrt "proof!! and even if proof then who cares!!!" like insinuating jayce was forced to touch icky pussy because he felt obligated to hide his gay passion brokeback piltover style isn't both hilarious and side eye worthy as a concept

they were probably also the anon glazing them earlier, in hindsight. i was the one who said they sounded ic for s1 jayce but the other one/two wasn't

(Anonymous) 2025-05-06 03:29 am (UTC)(link)
no i'm a veteran of wg who knows how many times people come here to make shit up. i'm not the same person going who cares. i do care actually but i need to see the deets

sorry not everyone believes every anon who comes here to whine about other people

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-06 03:36 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-06 03:40 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-06 03:45 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-06 03:46 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2025-05-06 03:41 am (UTC)(link)
lol seriously. and ~shaming~ anons for being overinvested as though they're not also frothily replying to every single comment in the thread and making sure the topic doesn't die. okay buddy.

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-06 03:43 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-06 03:54 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-06 04:01 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-06 07:38 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-06 03:59 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-06 03:51 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-06 04:06 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-06 04:08 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-06 04:11 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-06 04:13 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-06 04:19 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-06 04:20 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-06 04:23 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-06 04:24 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-06 04:25 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-06 04:26 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-06 04:29 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-06 04:31 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-06 07:20 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-06 07:18 (UTC) - Expand