Re: da

(Anonymous) 2025-05-07 10:16 pm (UTC)(link)
for game rp? yeah. but for memes? who cares. it’s their choice.

regardless this is shit that never happened because no one in this entire thread claimed they were too traumatized by women to tag female characters. they said they can’t play female characters, which is a boundary, and what made cc anon crash out

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2025-05-07 10:59 pm (UTC)(link)
still stand by it, nvm what zoomer terms people want to assign to "if you can't imagine finding any female characters in the breadth of fiction interesting because you're a woman yourself, that's indicative of some kind of mental illness therapy would help you with"

it could help a lot of you considering the sheer amount of shitting and clapping that seems to be happening over it, maybe. nobody stable is this sensitive i think

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2025-05-07 11:03 pm (UTC)(link)
okay continue arguing an issue you made up in your head i guess

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2025-05-07 11:04 pm (UTC)(link)
I’m not taking out a credit card. Nice try

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2025-05-07 11:24 pm (UTC)(link)
can you imagine going into a real life therapist with such a non-issue as..... who you chose to write as on niche roleplaying website dream width dot org lmfao

and when they ask you what makes you seek therapy, what is it exactly about this problem that is hindering your day-to-day functioning?

you answer someone on an anonymous barbie and ken forum told you that your preference to pose a ken doll instead of a barbie doll is indicative of a mental illness

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2025-05-07 11:27 pm (UTC)(link)
this entire thread is cracking me up as someone who works for a therapist's office