Ryan Gosling (
ryanongosling) wrote in
wankgate2025-02-08 11:45 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
253: abandon me harder daddy

Please mark any spoilers clearly and try not to spoil stuff that hasn't even aired yet for people.
Keep the rules in mind.
LATEST PAGE | LATEST FLATVIEW PAGE
Game Hate | Canon Hate | Namedropping | Mods' Pet Peeves | Game Pet Peeves | Plurk Pet Peeves | Meme Pet Peeves
Report stupid shit here.
Re: PLURK PET PEEVES
(Anonymous) 2025-06-11 10:11 pm (UTC)(link)Re: PLURK PET PEEVES
(Anonymous) 2025-06-11 10:58 pm (UTC)(link)Re: PLURK PET PEEVES
(Anonymous) 2025-06-11 11:11 pm (UTC)(link)you are disagreeing with reality
Re: PLURK PET PEEVES
(Anonymous) 2025-06-11 11:12 pm (UTC)(link)big "this sign won't stop me because i can't read" energy
Re: PLURK PET PEEVES
(Anonymous) 2025-06-11 11:17 pm (UTC)(link)not even pro ai but this claim is farcical quasi-religious bs
Re: PLURK PET PEEVES
(Anonymous) 2025-06-11 11:18 pm (UTC)(link)Re: PLURK PET PEEVES
(Anonymous) 2025-06-11 11:26 pm (UTC)(link)if you wanna claim you can read, go ahead and read this.
Re: PLURK PET PEEVES
(Anonymous) 2025-06-11 11:30 pm (UTC)(link)https://hbr.org/2024/07/the-uneven-distribution-of-ais-environmental-impacts
Re: PLURK PET PEEVES
(Anonymous) 2025-06-11 11:37 pm (UTC)(link)Re: PLURK PET PEEVES
(Anonymous) 2025-06-11 11:48 pm (UTC)(link)Re: PLURK PET PEEVES
(Anonymous) 2025-06-12 12:04 am (UTC)(link)provided you're literate enough to parse them but don't worry. there is always remedial adult education!
DA
(Anonymous) 2025-06-11 11:14 pm (UTC)(link)you use as much power and water generating ai prompts for 15 minutes as you do playing skyrim for 15 minutes, it's literally just a computer program
of all the good reasons to object to ai you got bitchy and snotty about the dumbest one
Re: DA
(Anonymous) 2025-06-11 11:16 pm (UTC)(link)AI also requires enormous data centers that are sucking up water and driving ppl out of their homes. your single search is cumulative with everyone else's millions of searches.
it sounds like a party line but it isn't. this is genuinely the thing that changed a lot of people's minds about LLMs here
Re: DA
(Anonymous) 2025-06-12 03:36 am (UTC)(link)has anyone fact checked any of these articles? or are they just assuming the science is accurate and the sources are legit and have no personal interest in swaying public opinion on AI for their personal benefit?
Re: DA
(Anonymous) 2025-06-12 03:48 am (UTC)(link)why would you assume the people pushing AI down everyone's throat to squeeze every cent out of it before the bubble pops aren't the ones bullshitting you?
Re: DA
(Anonymous) 2025-06-12 04:06 am (UTC)(link)Re: DA
(Anonymous) 2025-06-12 04:09 am (UTC)(link)fine
then you get linked to the harvard business review, a peer-reviewed publication, and food and water watch, a non-government organization with boots on the ground fighting for food sustainability, clean water and against climate change, and you're whining it needs to be 'fact checked'
fact one: everything is biased dummy
fact two: you're just a cunt moving the goal posts
Re: DA
(Anonymous) 2025-06-12 04:18 am (UTC)(link)Re: DA
(Anonymous) 2025-06-12 05:17 am (UTC)(link)Re: DA
(Anonymous) 2025-06-12 05:16 am (UTC)(link)what do you mean by "people"? what about stating actual fact is "tinfoil hat" lunacy? have you bias checked YOUR sources? wth
Re: DA
(Anonymous) 2025-06-11 11:47 pm (UTC)(link)you wish todd
Re: DA
(Anonymous) 2025-06-12 01:59 am (UTC)(link)Re: DA
(Anonymous) 2025-06-12 02:07 am (UTC)(link)todd fucking coward
Re: PLURK PET PEEVES
(Anonymous) 2025-06-11 11:17 pm (UTC)(link)