Ryan Gosling (
ryanongosling) wrote in
wankgate2025-02-08 11:45 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
253: abandon me harder daddy

Please mark any spoilers clearly and try not to spoil stuff that hasn't even aired yet for people.
Keep the rules in mind.
LATEST PAGE | LATEST FLATVIEW PAGE
Game Hate | Canon Hate | Namedropping | Mods' Pet Peeves | Game Pet Peeves | Plurk Pet Peeves | Meme Pet Peeves
Report stupid shit here.
Re: MEME PET PEEVES
(Anonymous) 2025-06-24 06:46 pm (UTC)(link)Re: MEME PET PEEVES
(Anonymous) 2025-06-24 07:26 pm (UTC)(link)Re: MEME PET PEEVES
(Anonymous) 2025-06-24 07:39 pm (UTC)(link)I only play from vidya, so I haven’t bothered tagging, but I’ve noticed it a good bit
Re: MEME PET PEEVES
(Anonymous) 2025-06-24 11:39 pm (UTC)(link)Tho tbf that big group also ignores most other MCU players. would have never cared or noticed if they weren't in so many memes on the first few pages with massive threads to eachother and only eachother all the time
Re: MEME PET PEEVES
(Anonymous) 2025-06-25 12:51 am (UTC)(link)i'll say though some of the mcus do tag others. you're right about that particular group though. i don't bother with them anymore
Re: MEME PET PEEVES
(Anonymous) 2025-06-25 01:02 am (UTC)(link)Re: MEME PET PEEVES
(Anonymous) 2025-06-25 02:13 am (UTC)(link)But yeah, good luck getting Thunderbolts minus the occasional Bucky to tag you.
+1
(Anonymous) 2025-06-25 02:13 am (UTC)(link)Re: +1
(Anonymous) 2025-06-25 02:21 am (UTC)(link)Re: +1
(Anonymous) 2025-06-25 02:23 am (UTC)(link)Re: +1
(Anonymous) 2025-06-25 02:48 am (UTC)(link)Re: +1
(Anonymous) 2025-06-25 03:23 am (UTC)(link)Re: +1
(Anonymous) 2025-06-25 03:26 am (UTC)(link)Re: +1
(Anonymous) 2025-06-25 03:33 am (UTC)(link)the onus of proof is on you since you're the one who claimed there's netflix mcus being cliquey
Re: +1
(Anonymous) 2025-06-25 06:56 am (UTC)(link)Re: +1
(Anonymous) 2025-06-25 07:21 am (UTC)(link)Re: +1
(Anonymous) - 2025-06-25 07:52 (UTC) - ExpandRe: +1
(Anonymous) - 2025-06-25 08:29 (UTC) - Expand+1
(Anonymous) 2025-06-25 02:48 am (UTC)(link)Re: +1
Re: +1
(Anonymous) 2025-06-25 04:19 pm (UTC)(link)Re: MEME PET PEEVES
(Anonymous) 2025-06-26 10:29 pm (UTC)(link)1. A lot of these thunderbolts players have been on bs for years prior to the movie coming out. I never had any problem getting crosscanon threads with them. Usually I was the only one tagging their toplevels at all in any given meme. Barely anyone cared about them before now (and if your response is BUT BUCKY that's exactly my point.)
2. Of course they're excited to be playing together, it's a new team that attracted more players and ships that are still fresh and shiny. Like any new canon, you'll just have to wait for the trend hoppers to fall off and for their tag load to die down. They're not going to be tagging out when they're already spoiled for choice, so the onus is on those who want to play with them to reach out. That's always how it's been on bs.
3. The only real difference in the people playing from thunderbolts before and after the movie is the influx of Johns and Bobs. So it makes it seem like that's where your actual attention is, and not all the Yelenas and Buckys that have been around all along.
4. Nothing is stopping you from picking up a thunderbolts character and participating if you're feeling that left out. There's barely any Alexeis, Avas, Mels, Valentinas around and I bet they'd be happy to play with. I even see Taskmasters getting threads and she died instantly. Unless all you actually care about is the white cock du jour fest
5. The fact you're checking how fast they're tagging any particular thread vs another makes it seem like you have major confirmation bias against either these players specifically or you're bitter they're currently more popular than your character. Which is funny because these characters weren't all that popular before, it's only a problem now that they are?
Re: MEME PET PEEVES
(Anonymous) 2025-06-27 12:52 am (UTC)(link)Re: MEME PET PEEVES
Re: MEME PET PEEVES
(Anonymous) 2025-06-27 01:17 am (UTC)(link)but her and nat both attract a certain kind of player.
Re: MEME PET PEEVES
(Anonymous) 2025-06-29 08:24 pm (UTC)(link)Re: MEME PET PEEVES
(Anonymous) 2025-06-29 08:23 pm (UTC)(link)