Re: SURVIVOR: ANON HATE EDITION, ROUND 2

(Anonymous) 2015-03-27 03:57 pm (UTC)(link)
hi nazitra

0/10

(Anonymous) 2015-03-27 04:00 pm (UTC)(link)
<\i>

Re: sa

(Anonymous) 2015-03-27 04:00 pm (UTC)(link)
facts? what facts? if you were using facts we wouldn't be having this discussion.

seriously. try to find one or two and maybe we can go on. or just state opinion as fact some more. that was better than the directionless monkey jabber you've had going on the last couple of comments.

come on, i know you can do it if you try. you managed a few interesting comments before you were reduced to this.

(Anonymous) 2015-03-27 04:00 pm (UTC)(link)
who?

(Anonymous) 2015-03-27 04:02 pm (UTC)(link)
>women who fetishize gay men usually are not particular pushy, nor do they in my experience objectify the gay men they write about.


ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaaha

sa

(Anonymous) 2015-03-27 04:04 pm (UTC)(link)
0/10 for me too, apparently

Re: sa

(Anonymous) 2015-03-27 04:07 pm (UTC)(link)
shhh, shh, shhh. i know, baby, i know. just let it all know.

i know it's hard to click that little link labeled (Parent) that takes you up to all your embarrassing failures but you can do it if you really try

go ahead, nonnie. i have faith in you

(Anonymous) 2015-03-27 04:07 pm (UTC)(link)
get off the meme kevin

Re: sa

(Anonymous) 2015-03-27 04:09 pm (UTC)(link)
man, i have given you all the ammo in the world to make real remarks and effective personal jabs and used actual cited resources in my actual arguments about the base issue.

you're just disappointing and sad.

maybe someone with more than their brain stem functioning can pick up where you left off.

Re: sa

(Anonymous) 2015-03-27 04:11 pm (UTC)(link)
> actual cited resources

tumblr doesn't count as a resource lmao

(Anonymous) 2015-03-27 04:11 pm (UTC)(link)
Its honestly a mix with each taking 1/3 regarding importance.

That's not an advantage. Fandom is basically the only thing I can "ignore" ... well, I mean I don't care so much about playing against canonmates or the medium divide. But I'd also consider being IC part of the fandom portion as well as the writing one.

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2015-03-27 04:12 pm (UTC)(link)
anon, it was an offer. and i've gotten good non-neckbeardy f/f threads from people on WG and RPA. I was trying to be encouraging. Chill.

Re: JUSTINE

(Anonymous) 2015-03-27 04:13 pm (UTC)(link)
well suited to each other when danzy plays connor like 'canon gay' is the full extent of his personality

(Anonymous) 2015-03-27 04:16 pm (UTC)(link)
We can. Wankgate is for wanking, brosis. The problem IS the mods letting a player dominate a good chunk of the modplot like Dragon has been. I'd say Jappleack and Dandy are the same, but at least those muns are making the effort to be open and welcoming to anyone getting involved. Dragon never seems to invite anyone but his buttbuddies into plots.

(Anonymous) 2015-03-27 04:17 pm (UTC)(link)
no, because the "gay men" they objectify in their writing aren't ACTUALLY gay, but two straight dudes they insist are totally in love with each other. then they write non-stop about all the details of their buttfucking.

(Anonymous) 2015-03-27 04:22 pm (UTC)(link)
(ツ)

(Anonymous) 2015-03-27 04:24 pm (UTC)(link)
it doesn't take kevin to know that straight women do the same damn thing to gay men that straight men do to lesbians.

what do you think a "fag hag" is, anon?

ITT: ASSBLASTED SKEEVY F/F MALE PLAYERS

(Anonymous) 2015-03-27 04:26 pm (UTC)(link)
kevin's pulled a chris d'amico and raised himself an army of toxic mega dicks from twitter

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2015-03-27 04:27 pm (UTC)(link)
the only way you could have failed this check is if you haven't been playing at all these last two months

strikes are for unexpected/emergency business, which the mods said you could discuss with them. if you've just been slacking off because you thought you could fall back on a strike, i have no sympathy for you.

DA

(Anonymous) 2015-03-27 04:29 pm (UTC)(link)
I have no dog in this fight, but I find all of this fascinating to read, specially after this popped up on my facebook feed yesterday.

http://www.artofmanliness.com/2012/07/29/bosom-buddies-a-photo-history-of-male-affection/

I really have no knowledge of how any of this was like, and wish I had studied history more closely, myself, but as an adult I'm picking up more and more interest in the 20s and 30s. Not to make you rant or drag out more wank, but I do wonder if the male-closeness of that age and those before it are what come off as so homoerotic to people in this era.

(Anonymous) 2015-03-27 04:32 pm (UTC)(link)
the thing is that these people don't realize that. schlock can be incredibly fun but not when people pick and analyze it to death under the impression that there's a deeper meaning to it all. pseudo intellectualism ruined this fandom.

pretty sure it ruined the series too because no way in hell am i supposed to believe that in any way shape or form mgs4 was supposed to be touching or gripping in any way. that final boss fist fight is the funniest thing I've ever seen.

Re: DA

(Anonymous) 2015-03-27 04:33 pm (UTC)(link)
considering kids these days seem to think that if two men look at each other for more than two seconds, it's a secret homosexual love affair, i wouldn't be surprised.

da

(Anonymous) 2015-03-27 04:46 pm (UTC)(link)
yaoi fandom is still a shithole, but there's been a pretty big pushback against fetishization/objectification in recent years. a lot of stuff that used to be totally acceptable is now strongly side-eyed. there's still a lot of objectification but yaoi fandom is so much better than it used to be.

the neckbeard side of the f/f world is still obsessed with heavily fetishized lolicon or borderline lolicon shit.

Re: HEADCANONS YOU HATE

(Anonymous) 2015-03-27 04:49 pm (UTC)(link)
I've seen a lot more stuff about Lars being trans than Steven tbh

like I can see where they got it but the amount of people absolutely 100% convinced their ~feels~ = definitely canon is annoying

(Anonymous) 2015-03-27 04:51 pm (UTC)(link)
I side-eye the shit out of guys who play f/f

the younger their characters and the older they are, the less I like them

pedro