wankgate | 161: because most of the people in this hobby are godawful writers

why are you so determined to prove her innocence?

maybe she's as much of a manipulative shitstain as gen and kippur?????

then provide evidence, anon.

the only thing we're pointing out is that there is all this dirt proving how much of a manipulative shitstain gen is, how much of a greedy bitch kippur is, and how much of a total lunatic that kitt player is. yet we have nothing that shows murgy being a piece of shit or an insincere bullshit artist. she's also not even in the game anymore, so how she was supposed to take over a game she's not even in is quite a feat.

that's the thing for this, anon. we have a lot of evidence for everyone else, but the only thing we have on murgy is your absolute grudgewanky insistence that she's the mastermind of this whole thing and is actually satan reborn.

we follow the trail of evidence, anon. sorry to disappoint with our refusal to be your army.

pastebin anon has confirmed multiple times that Murgy was the other mod involved in the takeover. she's in the takeover plurk. there is evidence everywhere, you just don't want to see it.

again

involved how?

I think they're a MEDIATOR

that's the confirmation i see. giving the go-ahead to write a post that hey, maybe she thought was okay depending on what was being told to her is not the same as trying to sneak a fucking game away from a mod who wants to close it.

http://pastebin.com/L6h1yxch

reading the pastebin here, i see one 'i'd like to help but i can't do it alone' in terms of keeping the game open and an 'agreed' to moving the conversation to the post. how this becomes 'part of the mastermind plot to steal the game' in your mind is beyond me.

if you don't like her, just admit you have a grudgeboner for her for an unexplainable reason beyond that you do. stop trying to twist shit to make it seem like you're justified. sometimes people just don't like people. it happens. but the reason people are giving you a weird look is because you keep saying shit like it's gospel and saying 'well, she was IN the plurk, therefore it means she was the ringleader'. she wasn't. gen was. she just didn't have the backbone to do anything beyond dropping the game and mod post.

even in this link: http://wankgate.dreamwidth.org/43251.html?thread=170352883#cmt170352883

pastebin anon says: "my friend has told me it was murgy and kippur who were the two mods who agreed to post the post and gen wrote it, and their source on that was unsurprisingly gen."

you see the problem people are having here? gen's writing the report here and you're gobbling the fiction as fact.

why don't you admit you have a fetish for white knighting murgy?

murgy has never flat-out denied being the third mod involved here. even kippur hasn't jumped up to defend her. if she wasn't involved why the hell not say so?

because afaik, she's never been the type to make plurks/posts about how uninvolved in things she is. she's 41, dude. she's not some drama student trying to play us all for fools. she was involved. she was part of the mod team. gen's been helpfully spreading misinformation to try to pass the buck, and when things started to get ugly, murgy dropped. why? because she can't handle drama and confrontation. being part of the mod team doesn't equal plotting the game's demise. you're really reaching. just admit you have a hateboner and want to shit on murgy for the pure fun of shitting on her.

LMAO why do you keep bringing up her age? there are plenty of people in rp who are in their forties who aren't constantly in the center of a damn wank tornado.

is she your rp mommy and that's why you feel the need to go all bear cub on the situation? because you sound super personally involved and invested in defending her.

it looks to me like this anon only posted her age once.

on the other hand, there are the grudgewankers to keep squawking about her age and how that magically removes gullibility.

i brought up something that's been brought up from both sides of this discussion because some people seem to think it's relevant. i'm an outside party. i'm not friends with her. i don't play with her. i'm not in any games with her. but outside parties can still pass by something that isn't right and stop and go 'hey, that isn't right'.

i'm an outside party to a lot of shit that happens here on wg and i pop my nose in a lot of times. i don't have to be so hurt and affected by this, or invested and totally in love with someone to have an opinion and voice it, anonly, on a place specifically for that.

inb4: if you're not involved, you shouldn't say anything. if you think only people that are involved in anything that happens on wg are the ones commenting, i have this really cool timeshare you might be interested in. judging by half the things i see on here about people, i see 'i don't know x, but____' a lot. and i don't know murgy, but judging by what i've seen in this thread and all the other clusterfucks happening because of this and past ones brought up re: boomtown, there just isn't any actual evidence or, you know, 'deets' pointing to murgy being anything more than a clueless dolt. she's not backstabby. she doesn't do things behind people's back. she doesn't do wanky things herself, she just has the bad fortune to constantly be around wanky jerks. calling someone out for being wanky by association when the wankers they're associating with aren't ken level rapists is pretty pathetic. the fact that someone or multiple someones keeps dropping here here and trying to claim that she's a wanker because... because? because she's boring. "no, it's not just that." okay, then what is it? "she's..." what? "it's not just that she's boring!!"

right. sure it's not. or maybe it's not, but no one has actually presented actual deets, screecaps, pastebins, or threads as proof that she's done anything. barring this single incident, even when asked 'what has she done?' the threads just fizzle out because nothing besides 'be boring' gets mentioned. and even now, the pastebin anon has said 'well, i'm being told that she okayed posting the second post, but my friend telling me this is being told this by gen'. that's... yeah. you call that deets if you want. just don't sit here wondering why people aren't taking it as gospel.

"i'd like to help but i can't do it alone' isn't evidence enough for you?

really?

also i'd gladly bet on the idea of kippur being the person who was the actual ringleader, with gen pushing hard enough from behind. kippur's the quietest and likeliest the silent mamba in this all. murgy may have the least amount of influence, but she's involved and never denied she was involved.

do you not understand context? she'd like to help keep the game open, but she can't do modding/coding whatever alone. that's what that was in relation to. not 'gee guys, help me take over this thing because more assholes are better than one'.

whatever gets you through the day murgy white knight.

i'm the anon above and even i don't think she's a manipulative shitstain. if you have more deets then cough them up.

five question marks.

on a sentence that isn't even a question.

my, someone's handflappy today.

161: because most of the people in this hobby are godawful writers

Re: dda

Re: dda

Re: dda

Re: dda

Re: dda

http://wankgate.dreamwidth.org/43251.html?thread=170432755#cmt170432755

sa

Re: sa

Re: sa

Re: sa

Re: sa

ayrt

Re: http://wankgate.dreamwidth.org/43251.html?thread=170432755#cmt170432755

Re: http://wankgate.dreamwidth.org/43251.html?thread=170432755#cmt170432755

Re: http://wankgate.dreamwidth.org/43251.html?thread=170432755#cmt170432755

Re: dda

Re: dda