+1

(Anonymous) 2016-08-16 09:26 am (UTC)(link)
why do people around here get so weirdly butthurt when people guess a low number? jesus christ, this happens literally every time. order some grass off amazon or something because it's clear y'all never go outside

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2016-08-16 10:23 am (UTC)(link)
i'm not butthurt, i just enjoyed the survey results

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2016-08-16 05:55 pm (UTC)(link)
i'm not sure how a result of under 1500 is enjoyable, unless you're one of those people not just aware dwrp is shrinking but glad about it

1200 is not a large number, anon. my graduating class was a larger number than that and it was a small town school

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2016-08-16 05:56 pm (UTC)(link)
it's certainly a lot larger than <500, you muppet.

stop trying to make "DWRP IS ~~DYING~~" happen.

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2016-08-16 06:05 pm (UTC)(link)
1200 is not very much larger than 500, except in your fantasy world

keep sticking your head in the sand and screaming for no one to listen to to that "DWRP IS ~~THRIVING~~" and has totally not diminished in any way at all

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2016-08-16 06:12 pm (UTC)(link)
it is literally more than twice as large, you math-challenged fucktruck

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2016-08-16 06:14 pm (UTC)(link)
keep telling yourself it's a large number and totally proof that dwrp is healthy and thriving

you really must give us some seminars on living in denial, i've always wanted to try it

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2016-08-16 06:22 pm (UTC)(link)
that was my first comment in the thread, but nice try

keep telling yourself you know what numbers mean

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-16 18:24 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-16 18:30 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-16 18:33 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-16 18:37 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-16 18:38 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-16 18:43 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-16 18:41 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-16 18:42 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-16 18:46 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-16 18:49 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-16 18:52 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-16 18:54 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-16 19:06 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-16 19:07 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-16 19:09 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-16 19:12 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-16 18:54 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-16 19:00 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-16 19:04 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-16 19:06 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-16 19:07 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-16 19:11 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-16 19:09 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-16 19:10 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-16 19:11 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-16 19:12 (UTC) - Expand

da

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-16 19:05 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-16 19:09 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-16 19:12 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-16 19:16 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-16 19:20 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-16 19:22 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-16 19:23 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-16 19:24 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-16 20:12 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-16 19:01 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-16 18:33 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-16 18:38 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-16 21:26 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-16 18:27 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-16 18:29 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-16 18:33 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-16 18:35 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-16 18:39 (UTC) - Expand

da

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-16 18:43 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-16 18:45 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-16 18:46 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-16 18:49 (UTC) - Expand

ayrt

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-16 18:36 (UTC) - Expand

Re: ayrt

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-16 18:40 (UTC) - Expand

Re: ayrt

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-16 18:42 (UTC) - Expand

Re: ayrt

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-16 18:44 (UTC) - Expand

Re: ayrt

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-16 18:44 (UTC) - Expand

Re: ayrt

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-16 18:45 (UTC) - Expand

Re: ayrt

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-16 18:47 (UTC) - Expand

Re: ayrt

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-16 18:48 (UTC) - Expand

Re: ayrt

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-16 18:52 (UTC) - Expand

Re: ayrt

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-16 18:46 (UTC) - Expand

Re: ayrt

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-16 18:48 (UTC) - Expand

Re: ayrt

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-16 18:49 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2016-08-16 06:19 pm (UTC)(link)
wtf? it's over twice as many. how is that "not much larger"?

nevermind. you just keep doing you, chicken little.

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2016-08-16 06:28 pm (UTC)(link)
when even the tiniest of mmos like darkspace and rise still have at least 4000 active players no, the difference between 500 and 1200 is not very significant

people like you mystify me. what good does denial ever do, besides making yourself feel better in the short term?

da

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-16 18:31 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-16 18:33 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-16 18:36 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-16 18:37 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-16 18:37 (UTC) - Expand

da, +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-16 18:39 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da, +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-16 18:42 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da, +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-16 18:44 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da, +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-16 18:46 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da, +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-16 18:47 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da, +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-16 18:51 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da, +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-16 18:55 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da, +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-16 19:01 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da, +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-16 19:27 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da, +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-16 18:57 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da, +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-16 19:04 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2016-08-16 06:48 pm (UTC)(link)
the vast range of opinions were enjoyable!

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2016-08-16 08:44 pm (UTC)(link)
12000 seniors is not a small town oh my god thats probably more people than we had in my ENTIRE SCHOOL

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2016-08-16 08:46 pm (UTC)(link)
alright I accidentally added a 0 in my head but still... I had maybe 300 people in my graduating class. Maybe.

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2016-08-17 01:56 am (UTC)(link)
Still huge to me, my graduating class was 20 and there were no holdbacks. My school only had 120 people k-12.

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2016-08-17 06:00 am (UTC)(link)
70 people in mine, and we were one of the biggest graduating classes they'd had.

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-17 19:24 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-18 03:12 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-18 03:29 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-18 03:46 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-18 05:11 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-18 12:11 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-18 03:21 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-18 03:53 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-18 04:05 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2016-08-16 09:07 pm (UTC)(link)
That would definitely be considered huge by my standards. I went to the biggest school in the county and our graduating class had 144.

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2016-08-16 09:58 pm (UTC)(link)
1400+ kids were the entirety of my senior class

we had overcrowding issues






the point is considering how big fandom is, 1.2k people is not a lot. it's a sizable amount of people, but unless we're getting fresh blood at a consistent rate, a lot of people will feel like it's small because the pool is full of the same shit.

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2016-08-17 07:33 pm (UTC)(link)
I've only been journal RPing since the last like two years we were on LJ so maybe I missed a huge heyday where we had thousands upon thousands of people, but to me it feels like we were never much bigger than that in the first place. Maybe a few thousand people instead of just 1200, but I'd be really surprised if we ever reached 10K, let alone were a sizable chunk of people who consider themselves part of "fandom."

(Anonymous) 2016-08-17 08:43 pm (UTC)(link)
and fewer of us had been in games together at that point and weren't as used to each other as we are now after four more years on plurk. plurk and new games make the dwrp world seem much smaller, but i've been around for 10 years and there are still a lot of well-known players i've never been in a game with.

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2016-08-17 09:11 pm (UTC)(link)
actually I would had pegged us for a significantly higher amount during those last two years

the fandom_counts community which was made during strike through or one of the mass bannings currently has over 25k members. a lot of them probably are duplicate journals since people were encouraged to sign up on all their fandom journals, butI remember there being a lot more than what's listed now. I want to say there was 40 or 50k before inactive accounts started being deleted but that's just how I remember it.

but no, lj fandom was really huge back in the day and ljrp fed off of it because people would advertise in the fandom communities. there were a ton of games that would open and be passed along by word of mouth, and no one really cared if they were similar. I think I was in 3 KH-based games at the same time at one point.

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2016-08-17 08:23 pm (UTC)(link)
1200+ is just the amount of people who took the survey, fuckstick.

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2016-08-17 08:29 pm (UTC)(link)
http://rpanons.dreamwidth.org/67317.html?thread=212208117#cmt212208117

there. now there's math. will everyone shut the fuck up?

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-17 20:36 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-17 20:55 (UTC) - Expand

da

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-17 21:00 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-17 21:10 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-17 21:15 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-17 21:39 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-17 21:40 (UTC) - Expand

+1

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-17 21:45 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-17 21:53 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-17 21:57 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-18 01:21 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-18 01:27 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-18 01:35 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-18 01:46 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-18 01:52 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-18 01:53 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-18 03:26 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-18 17:46 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-18 02:01 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-18 02:02 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-18 03:41 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-18 04:22 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-18 03:23 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-18 03:27 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-18 03:32 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-18 03:39 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-17 23:08 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-18 02:15 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-17 21:42 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-17 22:13 (UTC) - Expand

+1

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-18 03:14 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2016-08-16 05:20 pm (UTC)(link)
maybe people who are shit at math annoy them?

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2016-08-16 05:57 pm (UTC)(link)
that's kind of a dumbass thing to say and/or think when no one had ever actually done the math before

all estimates before this poll were completely informal so short of asking denise (which afaik no one ever did) no one had hard numbers of any kind

+1

(Anonymous) 2016-08-16 07:48 pm (UTC)(link)
math had nothing to do with it