Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2017-01-03 05:42 pm (UTC)(link)
here we go, the "actually" and "to be fair" asshats

shouldn't you be on rpa whining about "BUT WHAT ABOUT PEOPLE WITH FOOD ALLERGIES??"

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2017-01-03 05:47 pm (UTC)(link)
oh, i'm so sorry. i didn't realize that your experiences and opinions were clearly the only ones that mattered. that the people you hate are supposed to be the only ones anyone can talk or think about, because your way is the right way.

carry on being god. do something about my taxes, you fucker.

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2017-01-03 07:28 pm (UTC)(link)
but but WHAT ABOUT ME AND MY EXPERIENCES???

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2017-01-03 07:46 pm (UTC)(link)
funny how different people have different experiences. even funnier how sometimes when someone hears something that's relatable to theirs, they might want to share an opposing side of it that's how conversations work. you're not talking into a void.

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2017-01-03 08:00 pm (UTC)(link)
no, that's how conversations with small children work.

"but what about, what about, what about, what about, what about, why why why why BUT WHY MOMMY??"

not everything is about you where you need to defend yourself and nitpick everything people are talking about.

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2017-01-03 08:11 pm (UTC)(link)
no. contradicting opinions and varied experiences isn't the same thing, but if you want to tell yourself that to feel superior so that you're clearly 'winning' and not just being told 'hey, sometimes this is why people do that thing you're complaining about', then you go right ahead. it's okay to be wrong, anon. or to find out new things. what's not okay is la la laing your way into making everyone else seem like the titinfant when you're the one screaming the loudest.

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2017-01-03 09:16 pm (UTC)(link)
or maybe you should realize that not everything revolves around you and you don't need to dive into a discussion to derail it with arguing over details.

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2017-01-03 09:45 pm (UTC)(link)
what discussion? it literally didn't exist as a "discussion" until those people disagreed. it existed as a tossed-off complaint. your "side" (which consists of rewording "SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP") is the only one diving into a discussion and derailing it.

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2017-01-03 09:53 pm (UTC)(link)
yep, nobody came in with BUT WHAT ABOUT???

never

it's all in our imaginations

da

(Anonymous) 2017-01-04 06:50 am (UTC)(link)
this is stupid, you are both stupid

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2017-01-04 10:36 pm (UTC)(link)
stop being stupid!

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2017-01-04 04:03 am (UTC)(link)
yes, details and facts should never come into a conversation ever. they're unamurrican.

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2017-01-03 07:22 pm (UTC)(link)
if you're going to be constanly butthurt over being told you're wrong, maybe you should get your facts straight before spewing shit.

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2017-01-03 07:29 pm (UTC)(link)
oh anon, don't pout.