Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-04-05 03:04 am (UTC)(link)
Seriously. No, dumbass, Denise will not shut down DWRP because some people don't want to play barbies with your friend.

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-04-05 03:08 am (UTC)(link)
ah yes, the hallmark of having a life.. coming to wankgate and resurrecting every ancient thread

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-04-05 03:09 am (UTC)(link)
https://pastebin.com/23QHsGm8

Down near the bottom.

tl;dr summary, player gets a preemptive ban from an invite only game, whines about it on plurk, decides it's a conspiracy of mean girls against him. Player's friends come in squawking about how excluding someone from an invite only game is cyberbullying.

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-04-05 03:11 am (UTC)(link)
we get it, you live on wg

(Anonymous) 2023-04-05 03:11 am (UTC)(link)
obama is still president, gas prices are still comfortably under $2, humanized raptors are all the rage on memes, and anons everywhere have just been bewitched into declaiming the name of the unholy one

pretty cozy, all in all

Re: Duplicity

(Anonymous) 2023-04-05 03:11 am (UTC)(link)
This.

The mod team is the least important part of Duplicity. If you want to do something, just do it. Unless you're being over the top obvious about it the mods can't be bothered to track you down to tell you no, since there's nothing they hate more than being forced to get off their asses and mod the game. If they do somehow catch you, apologize and keep doing it, but more subtly this time.

I've played like this my whole time here and enjoyed the hell out of it. It's really the only way to have a good time in the game.

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-04-05 03:15 am (UTC)(link)
"Misunderstanding on how regains worked (we were on totally different wavelengths about how the powers worked or measured up)"

why does this sound like trying to excuse godmodding to me

(Anonymous) 2023-04-05 03:16 am (UTC)(link)
i love how that one anon just said "moron on plurk trying to make their stupid livestream happen" and everyone instantly knew it was cat

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-04-05 03:18 am (UTC)(link)
don't judge, it's the only place ayrt feels welcome

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-04-05 03:19 am (UTC)(link)
oh them

they tried to powermod in MoM too

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-04-05 03:20 am (UTC)(link)
i'd be way too embarrassed to announce it to my whole plurk list if i got prebanned from a game i'd probably just apologize to the mods and go on my way

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-04-05 03:20 am (UTC)(link)
I have come to you many times concerning bullying. Your state you support the first amendment, but know this(and now you have me begging for help! Begging, does that seem right?):

"In his instructions to the jury, U.S. District Judge Richard D. Bennett stated that the First Amendment protection of free speech has limits, including vulgar, offensive and shocking statements, and that the jury must decide "whether the defendant's actions would be highly offensive to a reasonable person, whether they were extreme and outrageous and whether these actions were so offensive and shocking as to not be entitled to First Amendment protection".[116] See also Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire, a case where certain personal slurs and obscene utterances by an individual were found unworthy of First Amendment protection, due to the potential for violence resulting from their utterance..."

This is something I came across in the Westboro Baptist Church's Wikipedia. It is in direct statement to certain statements uttered about a fallen soldier whom the Church both protested and also wrote nasty, hateful comments about said soldier on the internet to harm his family. Read it here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Westboro_Baptist_Church

You state you support the first amendment, but it has limits. I have come to you on numerous occasions with you stating I should not go to Wankgate if I wished not to see it. Well, when I last came to you, they had followed me around and issued death threats to me..among other things.

I am including copies of said comments via tiny-pic.(Comments that said persons went to Wankgate later that day and were joyous, happy, and proud of themselves for bullying, demeaning, harassing me and others!) I plan to go to the police, the FBI, and/or anyone that will help me and listen to me. You cannot hide behind this amendment since it does work both ways. You support it, but you should support your users who pay for your services and come to you for help! This thing I tried to ignore, per your "advice". I tried, and for two months I was plagued with nightmares and an ever widening spiral into depression. I am bi-polar, and on medications. I have PTSD from Rape, from Bullying, from physical and emotional abuse from family members, and ex boyfriends. I was a subject of stalking by one of these ex's who also raped me, beat me, and emotionally and mentally abused me. I did take every action to get away from him, but the police said that they couldn't help due to him being my boyfriend at the time. This was pre-stalking laws and rape law upheaval, but I had a solid case. Just like I do here.

You have done nothing but trivialize my situation and what has been happening to me and others. Wankgate, even though the mod does delete or freeze threads, people still doxxing people, and speak hate-speech in epic proportions,(also posting people's addresses, which had to stay out in the open until the mod decided to check the comm. It stayed there for almost 12 hours before it was erased.) Telling other anons to kill themselves. I just saw one thread where an anon told someone to kill themselves and that thread was just frozen. You are letting these people get away with this hate crime, this bullying, and if and when something terrible happens YOU will be directly responsible.

Here are the comments I promised to show you. I even saved that thread, even if the mod hid those death threats and other comments to me. I STILL HAD TO SEE THEM, BE SUBJECT TO THEM, LIVE WITH THAT HATE. The hate that someone feels for me over a writing hobby!

My need to now go to therapy is your fault and responsibility. My depression, lack of sleep, and rekindled self loathing are your fault. You let them get away with it. It is as if you said those things yourselves. I am saving a copy of this email to forward to the police and FBI. They may not be able to do anything, but you had your chance, and you had your responsibility and you failed that simple task in the name of free speech. Thank you for letting hate speech, bullying, and the big egos from the people that have committed these crimes by letting them get away with it over and over again. Run on sentences be damned.

http://tinypic.com/r/71i72d/4

http://tinypic.com/r/a3lenl/4

http://tinypic.com/r/2i96yyo/4

http://tinypic.com/r/2hqukpt/4

http://tinypic.com/r/2m794yh/4

http://tinypic.com/r/jpbo04/4

The she has AIDS comment I couldn't find, so it is not listed above. It was in this meme on Bakerstreet: http://bakerstreet.dreamwidth.org/750866.html

Here is the Wankgate post that the Hi Rebutle anon was lauded for being funny, until I said something about what they did. Then someone commented with my username: http://wankgate.dreamwidth.org/11838.html?thread=31848254&style;=light. Read the rest of that meme, and you will find their happy comments about what they did. How they enjoyed it.

So, what other proof do you need? They do this to other people too. If something isn't done, I will also look into a lawsuit.

Sincerely,
beautifulsavages mun. (If you really need my name, you can probably find it on payment receipts for paid accounts. This one in particular.)

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-04-05 03:26 am (UTC)(link)
http://xkcd.com/1357

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-04-05 03:29 am (UTC)(link)
is this a copypasta

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-04-05 03:37 am (UTC)(link)
yes. completely unrelated copypasta.

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-04-05 03:40 am (UTC)(link)
ayrt probably just moves on from wank and doesn't feel the need to dredge shit back up like someone licking stale crumbs off the kitchen floor

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-04-05 04:03 am (UTC)(link)
I think you just didn't notice the timestamps

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-04-05 04:11 am (UTC)(link)
That constant use of :-P is bannable enough for me.

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-04-05 04:23 am (UTC)(link)
no that isn't cyberbullying

that's an invite only game working as intended

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-04-05 04:36 am (UTC)(link)
who are these people? they're all insufferable

ayrt

(Anonymous) 2023-04-05 04:44 am (UTC)(link)
I did journal-based rp, but I don't remember log comms being exclusively prose, but I'd have to go and check. I wonder if any games from the era I'm talking about ('09 to '12, about) are still extant...

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-04-05 04:45 am (UTC)(link)
aw, look at you seething because you don't get to set the expiration date on wank. it's adorable really

who's still the same stunted shithead they were 12 years ago? you are! yes you are! i've got the old acj deets to prove it, yes i do, goochy goochy goo!

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-04-05 04:46 am (UTC)(link)
XD XD XD

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-04-05 04:49 am (UTC)(link)
the ton ducked a bullet but its trajectory is set to straight dome sail

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-04-05 05:00 am (UTC)(link)
i recognize the pastebin op, they're one of those oldschool gsai-style neckbeards who've always flown just under the radar and changed their handle to a single letter to duck past wank. iirc they were involved in some meme comm drama back in the day too, couldn't tell you what tho

the other people in that thread are just the usual collection of asspatters and orbiters you can find on any type a wanker's friendslist. nobody really worth the trouble of namedropping