Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-04-06 12:58 pm (UTC)(link)
wasnt really angry, was more sour grapes venting while weirdly insisting he wasnt sad.

Re: ayrt

(Anonymous) 2023-04-06 12:59 pm (UTC)(link)
lol solstice aka rebutle is once again drawn to wank like a moth to the flame

please let her be the grudgy mod wanking on C. please please please. i will donate to ukraine, i will vote blue no matter who, just let the wank gods be good this one time

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-04-06 01:02 pm (UTC)(link)
So you don't join any game that has annoying people in it?

Please, give me a list of these moron-free games you've found. Sincerely. I would love a game without a single irritant to ignore in it. I didn't even known that such a fantastic beast could exist.

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-04-06 01:02 pm (UTC)(link)
https://pastebin.com/gQbFgewb

pretty sure this was before it hit wankgate but plurk doesnt have exact timestamps

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-04-06 01:03 pm (UTC)(link)
i liked his whole "i have a rhinoceros hide so stuff like this never bothers me" front

surejan.gif

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-04-06 01:03 pm (UTC)(link)
one of the kaisou mods has a reputation for not being able to let shit go.
i would not be surprised if they blew this out of proportion too.

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-04-06 01:05 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't join games with a critical mass of annoying people

pointing you toward the exceptions would be counter-productive

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-04-06 01:08 pm (UTC)(link)
nothings wrong with c except hes an entitled whiner who godmods as a Good Nazi, and his friends are conducting an increasingly broad witch hunt on his behalf

i dunno why anyone would not want this guy in their game

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-04-06 01:09 pm (UTC)(link)
this mod wouldn't by any chance be solstice, would it?

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-04-06 01:10 pm (UTC)(link)
oh, i see. you like to highlander that role

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-04-06 01:12 pm (UTC)(link)
he's banned from every game ever, yes

while in the same breath you say he's playing just fine in a game

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-04-06 01:13 pm (UTC)(link)
what the fuck are you even talking about

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-04-06 01:14 pm (UTC)(link)
witch hunt?

where witch hunt? what witch hunt?

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-04-06 01:14 pm (UTC)(link)
what the fuck are you even talking about

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-04-06 01:14 pm (UTC)(link)
his emotions just got the better of him and hes used to attacking others when his emotions get the better of him. no problems here.

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-04-06 01:15 pm (UTC)(link)
what. the fuck. are you even talking about.

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-04-06 01:16 pm (UTC)(link)
yeah as one of the people otherwise claiming this isn't wankworthy that hyperbole is a little ridiculous

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-04-06 01:16 pm (UTC)(link)
guy in 'anime witch hunter' halloween costume: its not a witch hunt unless its from the plymouth rock region. otherwise its just sparkling unsubstantiated smearing.

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-04-06 01:17 pm (UTC)(link)
it's wanky now that you idiots decided to try convincing wg having a laugh to not have a laugh

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-04-06 01:17 pm (UTC)(link)
he didnt even name any of the mods he was whining about

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-04-06 01:18 pm (UTC)(link)
"which witch hunt?" was right there smh

ayrt

(Anonymous) 2023-04-06 01:19 pm (UTC)(link)
dammit your right

Re: ayrt

(Anonymous) 2023-04-06 01:22 pm (UTC)(link)
"I'm C's friend and I think cyberbullying was an okay term to invoke"

all right chief

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-04-06 01:24 pm (UTC)(link)
tlv isn't technically a game tho

it's purgatory for shit-tiers

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-04-06 01:25 pm (UTC)(link)
I am in fact okay with joining games that exclude ppl who have given the mods trouble in the past. that's both fine and none if my business.