245: Tone Death Rapture: Championship Edition : Tournament Edition

[hateboner]

No Gods. No Capcha. Only Wank.

Please mark any spoilers clearly and try not to spoil stuff that hasn't even aired yet for people.

Keep the rules in mind.

LATEST PAGE | LATEST FLATVIEW PAGE

Game Hate | Canon Hate | Namedropping | Mods' Pet Peeves | Game Pet Peeves | Plurk Pet Peeves | Meme Pet Peeves

Report stupid shit here.

Comments

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

[(Anonymous)]

Well, that explains being butthurt about not being welcome in all games. I just remember their disastrous TDM in one game that included the sentence "How do make money again?"

Ironically, the game was one in which there was no form of currency in use. But they clearly hadn't read any of the game info.

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

[(Anonymous)]

https://meetandgreet.dreamwidth.org/568.html?thread=1592#cmt1592
https://bandit-of-ryloth.dreamwidth.org/profile

all i could find, sorry

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

[(Anonymous)]

also known as That Croker, yes

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

[(Anonymous)]

that croaker

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

[(Anonymous)]

that cocker

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

[(Anonymous)]

actually That Crocker

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

[(Anonymous)]

that coker

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

[(Anonymous)]

+1

they're a wanker and a problem for mods in every game they somehow end up in. constantly asking stupid questions and never read posts properly so they post inane things that don't make sense. they've also been caught bitching about their cr and tagging their targets in the plurk to make sure they see it then deleting it

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

[(Anonymous)]

https://the-enemy-ace.dreamwidth.org/profile

the maybe nazi

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

[(Anonymous)]

they're so functionally illiterate they make dark look like shakespeare

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

[(Anonymous)]

joe cocker?

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

[(Anonymous)]

iirc it was also a network post… in a game without a network

[(Anonymous)]

there's 16 new pages on flatview since i last checked wg yesterday, are they all about some idiot crying over not getting into a private game?

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

[(Anonymous)]

so he's literally admitting that he's a pain in the ass to mods by godmoding and throwing a shitfit over that and about being (rightfully) swept in ac because he couldn't be bothered to take 30 seconds to check in.

[(Anonymous)]

rpers aren't normal

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

[(Anonymous)]

he's plurked several times about other things and doesn't seem to be dwelling too much on the ban. the plurk itself was awkward as fuck, but he does seem to be moving along from it.

[(Anonymous)]

unfortunately it's still going

[(Anonymous)]

so why are you making yet another thread about it, moron

[(Anonymous)]

tragic

[(Anonymous)]

i can't piss into your open greedy mouth and this is the closest thing

[(Anonymous)]

we were pent up. kind of a lull after AI wank.

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

[(Anonymous)]

yeah it sure seems like half the anons in this thread have been banned from games for good reasons

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

[(Anonymous)]

+1

As a mod of a private game who has shared a game with C before, he's exactly the type of player I want to keep out. Refusing to grant an invite is not the same as banning someone from a public game and you don't need to justify it with recognized bad behavior. If I don't invite someone, it's because I don't want them in my game, full stop.

And I don't want C (and similar players) because they're awful writers who give boring, flat tags. I don't even have high standards for writing, 95% of DWRPers are just fine with me, but C is that sort of writer where playing with ChatGPT would produce more compelling threads. Most people in that category have been here long enough that they can write a passable app but I think a lot of them are about to be caught off guard by the fact that they're not wanted in private games. I wouldn't be surprised if the mods of the two games he was rejected from just saw his threads on their TDMs and said no thanks.

Maybe you need evidence of bad behavior or rule-breaking to ban someone from a public game, but private games are where mods are free to reject you because your tags are boring or because you need way too much hand-holding or anything else that could make them enjoy their own game less.

[(Anonymous)]

literally every page

if he set out to prove he shouldn't be banned he did the world's shittiest job

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

[(Anonymous)]

She's not a 'closet' wanker. She plays her friends against each other, lets them take the blame for the wank she causes, and got banned from Deerington for harassing the mods. She was also one of Jax's loudest defenders when she was rightfully called out for her transphobic and biphobic pride post.