Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-04-27 10:15 pm (UTC)(link)
what is harry potter

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-04-27 10:16 pm (UTC)(link)
but they're ~~nervous~~ about announcing it!!!

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-04-27 10:19 pm (UTC)(link)
saw someone on the plurk describing people as "getting uppity" completely unironically lol

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2011/11/yep-uppity-racist/335160/

great armchair activism you've got going on there guys

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-04-27 10:20 pm (UTC)(link)
but not nervous enough to disable comments, got to get those butt pats somehow

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-04-27 10:34 pm (UTC)(link)
Almost thought about correcting that person in the Plurk but tbh we should all know better about that word at this point

Re: a hypothetical

(Anonymous) 2023-04-27 10:42 pm (UTC)(link)
i reply to denise asking if she's sure she got the right comment because the one she linked is really tame

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-04-27 10:54 pm (UTC)(link)
that is pretty much the definition of a protest. it may not be a meaningful one, but it is literally saying you won't do something because you oppose something.

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-04-27 11:09 pm (UTC)(link)
i personally find it meaningful only when the op clarifies they think the franchise they're disparaging and everyone who likes it should eat shit and die

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-04-27 11:15 pm (UTC)(link)
the way i knew exactly who this was

yeah that feels about right for them

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-04-27 11:29 pm (UTC)(link)
StupidSexyV⚠der
I completely support you on this. I am curious if you are extending this to Woody Allen films?

who in the fuck is RPing from woody allen films

Re: ALISON

(Anonymous) 2023-04-27 11:44 pm (UTC)(link)
this person seems annoying but even during the ml wank i always thought everyone else was annoying, too

difficult to care

Re: a hypothetical

(Anonymous) 2023-04-28 12:32 am (UTC)(link)
The only anon behavior I can remember that I’m ashamed of is back on LJ, Denise has no power over me.

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-04-28 12:34 am (UTC)(link)
if they do icon requests/commissions then why wouldn’t they want to clarify this?

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-04-28 12:40 am (UTC)(link)
If OP is a harry potter fan I'm putting them in time out

Re: ALISON

(Anonymous) 2023-04-28 01:25 am (UTC)(link)
that pastebin is hilarious bc historically she's never played her characters as anything but perfect and without flaws

Re: ALISON

(Anonymous) 2023-04-28 01:28 am (UTC)(link)
wasn't tifa her bff?

Re: ALISON

(Anonymous) 2023-04-28 01:34 am (UTC)(link)
I thought they had beef rey didn't get to be the main character of a plot and she thought the ml mods were punishing her unfairly or something

Re: ALISON

(Anonymous) 2023-04-28 02:15 am (UTC)(link)
oh nice

uh still post deets though op, too lazy

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-04-28 02:45 am (UTC)(link)
because inky didn't do it for clarity, they did it for buttpats. like with everything else they do.

Re: ALISON

(Anonymous) 2023-04-28 02:57 am (UTC)(link)
https://wankgate.dreamwidth.org/62120.html?thread=242865064#cmt242865064

Re: ALISON

(Anonymous) 2023-04-28 03:00 am (UTC)(link)
it is wild to me that she unfriended me years ago even though we had zero falling out i just stopped playing barbies she was interested in smooshing her barbies into, and yet she is still friends with someone who would gleefully try to throw her under the bus.

listen, alison is a mess of a human, she's always been a little bit manipulative and reading this it doesn't seem like she's changed much. she can also be really fun to bounce ideas off of and thread with. just don't get personally invested in her and you'll be fine.

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-04-28 03:27 am (UTC)(link)
you didn’t clarify if they do requests/commissions or not

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-04-28 03:34 am (UTC)(link)
you seem to have kind of a grudgeboner against this person, which is fine, but at least tell us what they actually did to you instead of bringing this boring complaint here

nayrt

(Anonymous) 2023-04-28 03:54 am (UTC)(link)
they do both

(Anonymous) 2023-04-28 04:14 am (UTC)(link)
IDK, I've done it before because that's what I wanted to RP. And plenty of characters wanted to RP sex with my ugly character, so...apparently I'm not alone in my questionable tastes. If you don't want to rp sex with a character, then...don't.

It might actually be me you're talking about. If so...eh, I don't care.