Re: ayrt

(Anonymous) 2023-03-10 10:07 pm (UTC)(link)
do you not like my idea

Re: ayrt

(Anonymous) 2023-03-10 10:08 pm (UTC)(link)
I think you're having a completely different argument with a guy you made up in your head, anon, go smoke some weed

Re: ayrt

(Anonymous) 2023-03-10 10:08 pm (UTC)(link)
no because if that happens then what will i complain about

Re: ayrt

(Anonymous) 2023-03-10 10:09 pm (UTC)(link)
i already told you i cannot solve ALL of your problems

Re: ayrt

(Anonymous) 2023-03-10 10:09 pm (UTC)(link)
the guy i made up in my head who is at the top of this subthread complaining the opposite of what i posted in earnest

Re: ayrt

(Anonymous) 2023-03-10 10:10 pm (UTC)(link)
you will be boiled for this

(Anonymous) 2023-03-10 10:11 pm (UTC)(link)
this was years and years ago, but does anyone remember the time someone decided to advertise their weird nazi porn novel on the anon comms (or maybe it was just rpa?)

i just now remembered it was a thing today for some reason, and it's so bizarre and surreal that i have to know if anyone remembers what novel it was

(Anonymous) 2023-03-10 10:12 pm (UTC)(link)
oh jesus god in heaven i do remember

i don't remember the title or like who the nazi weirdo was

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2023-03-10 10:13 pm (UTC)(link)
well, if you parent up it's pretty explicit

we're accusing people of pointlessly editing a meme that would otherwise be friendly to things other than smut so that it's only usable for smut, and then smugly saying "good" when people who didn't want to play smut pointed out that this wasn't much fun for them.

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2023-03-10 10:14 pm (UTC)(link)
people made their own comm months ago and smut players are still treating it like a personal accusation of sluttery that this other comm still exists and gleefully crowing about how quickly interest in it was smothered.

Re: ayrt

(Anonymous) 2023-03-10 10:14 pm (UTC)(link)
except the guy at the top of the subthread is not complaining about what you've convinced yourself he's complaining about

signed, the guy at the top of the subthread

Re: ayrt

(Anonymous) 2023-03-10 10:15 pm (UTC)(link)
lmao

lol

Re: ayrt

(Anonymous) 2023-03-10 10:17 pm (UTC)(link)
i would love it if bs was that comm, then i wouldn't give a single haypenny fuck about the smut and shipping memes because there'd be a reasonable number of them that wouldn't smother everything else

Re: ayrt

(Anonymous) 2023-03-10 10:18 pm (UTC)(link)
"the ones that slot each character into a pre-determined role are the ones that rustle my jimmies, that's not a meme that's a glorified rp with me"

Re: ayrt

(Anonymous) 2023-03-10 10:18 pm (UTC)(link)
the difference is that memes aren't supposed to be just for the person posting them

it's the fact that they so frequently appeal to nobody except the person posting them that is precisely the problem

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2023-03-10 10:19 pm (UTC)(link)
lmao i love the twist you added at the end to make it all so malicious, when the reality is that particular poster is just an idiot who likes to play smut a lot and Smutty Truth or Dare is literally the only idea they ever come up with

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-03-10 10:19 pm (UTC)(link)
yeah it's me i'm one of them

i thought it was saying you had no preferences as to thread starter/scenario content period, rather than exclusively being an indication of shipping/smutting preference

Re: ayrt

(Anonymous) 2023-03-10 10:20 pm (UTC)(link)
bakerstreet will never be that comm. the mods don't give a ffuuuuuuuuuck

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-03-10 10:23 pm (UTC)(link)
adopts pince-nez and coughs

stop "shitting yourself like an anxiety chihuahua", also known as "asking for perfectly reasonable clarification", anon

Re: ayrt

(Anonymous) 2023-03-10 10:23 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm not sure what you think you're highlighting here

if you read the rest of the comment that you deliberately left out, the point is that these hyper-niche character dynamic memes are bad memes and should stay on emp/rp with me/kywtp/what the fuck ever

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2023-03-10 10:23 pm (UTC)(link)
LICH'RALLY earlier in this very thread, in response to gen players pointing out how unthinkingly frustrating this was, people gleefully retorted that that was a feature rather than a bug.

Re: ayrt

(Anonymous) 2023-03-10 10:24 pm (UTC)(link)
trust me i am well the fuck aware

Re: ayrt

(Anonymous) 2023-03-10 10:24 pm (UTC)(link)
yes, which is what i was making fun of in the comment i posted because i think its stupid and arbitrary

you didnt have to further illustrate the joke i dont think but i appreciate it all the same

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2023-03-10 10:24 pm (UTC)(link)
yeah people was me

because i know that poster and they're an idiot with only one idea

Re: ayrt

(Anonymous) 2023-03-10 10:26 pm (UTC)(link)
and that is why we will die in this thread