wankgate | 251: back in my day wank meant something

251: back in my day wank meant something

Threaded | Top-Level Comments Only

Maybe try putting some of that aggression you have about gpsl comm layouts towards literally anything else that actually matters.

having strong opinions about accessibility is not entitlement. quite the opposite. you're basically lifting up the middle finger to everyone you didn't know needed the accommodations and now they're never going to speak up

rancid

and you're wishing physical disability on people as a punishment/burden

maybe reassess???

wrong anon

i think an invisible sensory deficiency would be more effective

gr8 b8 m8 comparing wheelchair access in public spaces to using view settings on Dreamwidth for a private game you aren't in

no one needs to wish anything on you.

share them here

network rp sucks. stop boomeranging quasi ic one liners and go answer your log tags.

I don't care about what happens in a private game I'm not part of

underscores in usernames are fine

icons that aren't 100x100 are fine

no icons on a journal is fine

would much rather rp with someone who ticks all of these boxes and actually answers their tags than with someone who goes all in on the aesthetic and then never finishes any of their threads.

upon reflection, i think the saltburn mods are doing the layout right, since it's selecting you out of the potential player pool

This is the most grass deprived response I could possibly think of and I say that as someone who needs a mobility aid to go touch grass in my own day to day life

no anon making people click the view in your own layout or view in light mode option on the nav bar is literally the same as saying you want disabled people to die.

i'm a person who plays several characters played by the same actor. in my case i have 3 that i've played regularly, i have a certain type of character that i like to play and this actor just happens to play those roles often

i believe i'm in the "really like the actor and it's harmless" group, and i've met others who do this and they're not creepy obsessed, we just like what we like

that said, i see why it looks odd and i don't doubt some people who do this are weirdos. i think rpf is extremely strange. a lot of the behavior mentioned by others in this thread would be a red flag to me too. just saying some of us are harmless i promise lol

once again wg proves invite only games are working as intended

then why tf are you on wankgate

procrastinating on answering their tags, like the rest of us. wankgate is just tumblr for cunty little rp procrastinators.

thanks for lettung us know

You definitely sound like one of the weirdos, sorry to say.

they're never self aware lol

out of curiosity, why? genuine question. is there a scenario in your mind where a person could play multiples of the same pb without it being weird?

da

tbh I don't personally think it's weird, but maybe because I compare it to people who play/love characters voiced by the same actor. Sometimes you just really like someone's acting and portrayal, and as long as you differentiate their voices enoough, I'd just assume that's what it is.

some people think it's overinvestment or projecting your thirst for an actor, which it can be, and people just like to turn their noses up on anyone who dares to like something so much in their face.

da. maybe if the characters were so different that i couldn't tell from glancing at the muselist that they were the same actor? but it's usually all the same person in roles geared towards them looking as conventionally attractive as possible. it tells me that the player's tastes are shallow and bland, and while they might be perfectly nice and "harmless", they're probably boring with a side of secondhand embarrassment. not the worst person by far but not someone i'm excited to befriend.

wondering if this is sam/koko and her buttlicker friends in this thread

Threaded | Top-Level Comments Only

Page 78 of 308

251: back in my day wank meant something

Re: da

Re: da

Re: da

Re: da

Re: da

Re: da

UNPOPULAR DWRP OPINIONS

Re: UNPOPULAR DWRP OPINIONS

Re: UNPOPULAR DWRP OPINIONS

Re: UNPOPULAR DWRP OPINIONS

+1

Re: da

Re: da

Re: da

no subject

+1

Re: UNPOPULAR DWRP OPINIONS

nayrt

no subject

no subject

+1

no subject

no subject

no subject

ayrt