monosexual-anon

(Anonymous) 2025-02-12 02:59 am (UTC)(link)
i wasn't even going to go there, but i'm glad you brought it up

my sides are in fucking orbit

Re: monosexual-anon

(Anonymous) 2025-02-12 03:00 am (UTC)(link)
did you read it though? because it does make so good points wrt lateral aggression

y'all are confusing lateral aggression for actual oppression

Re: monosexual-anon

(Anonymous) 2025-02-12 03:03 am (UTC)(link)
Why are you making a thread about a foppish bisexual elf vampire your final thesis on lgbt solidarity

Re: monosexual-anon

(Anonymous) 2025-02-12 03:04 am (UTC)(link)
i wasn't? i'm talking about the anon who used monosexual as a serious term

are you okay?

Re: monosexual-anon

(Anonymous) 2025-02-12 03:08 am (UTC)(link)
Aren’t you tired

Re: monosexual-anon

(Anonymous) 2025-02-12 03:07 am (UTC)(link)
this one anon is struggling to think critically all over this thread

Re: monosexual-anon

(Anonymous) 2025-02-12 03:07 am (UTC)(link)
no what's happening here is that, as always, astarion brings the sexuality wank

another reason why i can't stand him

Re: monosexual-anon

(Anonymous) 2025-02-12 03:10 am (UTC)(link)
on tumblr and reddit the astarion girlies are being queerphobic and focused on defending his right to be a manly man who manlyingly fucks women, on tiktok and dreamwidth they're ... differently being queerphobic by saying flamboyancy is just being a closeted transwoman

Re: monosexual-anon

(Anonymous) 2025-02-12 03:13 am (UTC)(link)
Is saying a bisexual character fucks women queerphobic?

Genuinely asking because I don’t Reddit so don’t the full Discourse.

Re: monosexual-anon

(Anonymous) 2025-02-12 03:15 am (UTC)(link)
it's not about that, it's about trying to reframe him as only being a viable companion for female characters, because a loud and vocal subset of fans are straight ciswomen who resent sharing their fantasy boyfriend with the icky queers

Re: monosexual-anon

(Anonymous) 2025-02-12 03:18 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah, fair, that’s freak behavior. Biphobia is insidious smh.

Re: monosexual-anon

(Anonymous) 2025-02-12 03:19 am (UTC)(link)
you're trying too hard

9/10 for getting to bite the bait with monosexual though

Re: monosexual-anon

(Anonymous) 2025-02-12 03:21 am (UTC)(link)
Lmao what? Pointing out that cishet women painting bi men as less than ideal partners is biphobia means I’m trolling?

Re: monosexual-anon

(Anonymous) 2025-02-12 03:22 am (UTC)(link)
that's not what you're doing all over this thread

Re: monosexual-anon

(Anonymous) 2025-02-12 03:24 am (UTC)(link)
I’m sorry I said the bad word that hurt your feelings, but you don’t have to be unhinged about it.

Biphobia’s still real tho.

Re: monosexual-anon

(Anonymous) 2025-02-12 03:27 am (UTC)(link)
i don't care about the word but you are annoying

Re: monosexual-anon

(Anonymous) - 2025-02-12 03:31 (UTC) - Expand

Re: monosexual-anon

(Anonymous) - 2025-02-12 03:38 (UTC) - Expand

Re: monosexual-anon

(Anonymous) 2025-02-12 03:14 am (UTC)(link)
flamboyancy is not always being a closeted transwoman for something it is. and that distinction is important because too many people swing too hard to the other side and act like any trans woman who sees themselves represented in said flamboyance is a weirdo

Re: monosexual-anon

(Anonymous) 2025-02-12 03:15 am (UTC)(link)
but for some it is*

Re: monosexual-anon

(Anonymous) 2025-02-12 03:16 am (UTC)(link)
k

Re: monosexual-anon

(Anonymous) 2025-02-12 03:18 am (UTC)(link)
riveting discussion anon definitely not coming across as someone pissy some people headcanon stuff you don't like

Re: monosexual-anon

(Anonymous) 2025-02-12 03:20 am (UTC)(link)
sorry the thread didn't go the way you wanted. better luck next time

Re: monosexual-anon

(Anonymous) 2025-02-12 03:21 am (UTC)(link)

Re: monosexual-anon

(Anonymous) 2025-02-12 03:21 am (UTC)(link)

Re: monosexual-anon

(Anonymous) 2025-02-12 03:16 am (UTC)(link)
almost like queers are never happy with anything and prone to infighting

imagine

Re: monosexual-anon

(Anonymous) 2025-02-12 03:16 am (UTC)(link)
oh, anon