Ryan Gosling (
ryanongosling) wrote in
wankgate2025-02-08 11:45 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
253: abandon me harder daddy

Please mark any spoilers clearly and try not to spoil stuff that hasn't even aired yet for people.
Keep the rules in mind.
LATEST PAGE | LATEST FLATVIEW PAGE
Game Hate | Canon Hate | Namedropping | Mods' Pet Peeves | Game Pet Peeves | Plurk Pet Peeves | Meme Pet Peeves
Report stupid shit here.
Re: paste
(Anonymous) 2025-05-12 03:48 pm (UTC)(link)i used to mod and the way they went about this reads poorly. if a player reported an absent player to us because they had funerals to attend? the reporter would get an outright strike. death outweighs roleplay games
the mod addition that "if it's canon or not doesn't matter" is a bad choice, if that was the heart of the cast conflict in the first place. everyone in the caps needed to calm down and shut the fuck up, but the mods look pathetic at mediation and handling a problem
NAYRT
(Anonymous) 2025-05-12 03:53 pm (UTC)(link)+1
(Anonymous) 2025-05-12 03:59 pm (UTC)(link)Re: +1
Re: +1
(Anonymous) 2025-05-12 04:50 pm (UTC)(link)classy
Re: +1
(Anonymous) 2025-05-12 04:53 pm (UTC)(link)get off wg bekka
Re: +1
(Anonymous) 2025-05-12 04:55 pm (UTC)(link)da
(Anonymous) 2025-05-12 04:03 pm (UTC)(link)"I just wasn't worth reaching out to"
https://i.imgur.com/sENScqS.jpeg
Lots of complaints about no one reaching out to them while also complaining that they're being judged for taking time off from RP. Din and Robin went to the mods about things Beck actually did after popping up again to be involved, not with a complaint that Beck wasn't active enough. Kri's phrasing here is really bad as a mod but gives better clues as to how Beck's absence was handled:
"Din and Robin have expressed that you seem to be all but absent until it suits you, seemingly to cause drama both IC and OOC. I find this to be true as well. It sits poorly that you barely try to be involved except to start and then perpetuate drama."
https://i.imgur.com/7BZC8oN.jpeg
da
(Anonymous) 2025-05-12 04:22 pm (UTC)(link)how is this not a complaint about a player's absence due to deaths? that's what happens when people die, focus changes and your time becomes limited
if the rest of the players were making decisions that affect the whole cast, not reaching out to the absent player isn't the fault of the absent player
that's unfairly shifting blame
Re: da
(Anonymous) 2025-05-12 04:23 pm (UTC)(link)Re: da
(Anonymous) 2025-05-12 04:23 pm (UTC)(link)also can we not pretend that IC joking about gene roddenberry's feelings about body hair rises to the level of "making decisions that affect the whole cast"
Re: da
(Anonymous) 2025-05-12 04:30 pm (UTC)(link)Re: da
(Anonymous) 2025-05-12 04:36 pm (UTC)(link)why say that beck was nasty too in the mod "mediation" if they weren't a problem / point out another player was trying to "find a way forward"?
Re: da
(Anonymous) - 2025-05-12 16:47 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2025-05-12 16:49 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2025-05-12 17:09 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2025-05-12 17:12 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2025-05-12 17:12 (UTC) - Expand+1
(Anonymous) - 2025-05-12 17:15 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2025-05-12 17:16 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2025-05-12 17:17 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2025-05-12 17:18 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2025-05-12 17:18 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2025-05-12 17:19 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2025-05-12 17:25 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2025-05-12 17:27 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2025-05-12 17:35 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2025-05-12 17:36 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2025-05-12 17:40 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2025-05-12 17:42 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2025-05-12 17:43 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2025-05-12 17:46 (UTC) - ExpandSA
(Anonymous) - 2025-05-12 17:23 (UTC) - ExpandRe: SA
(Anonymous) - 2025-05-12 17:23 (UTC) - ExpandRe: SA
(Anonymous) - 2025-05-12 17:24 (UTC) - Expandnayrt
(Anonymous) 2025-05-12 04:39 pm (UTC)(link)Re: da
(Anonymous) 2025-05-12 04:46 pm (UTC)(link)https://i.imgur.com/r9mD90f.png
https://i.imgur.com/2Cq2ZvL.png
Re: da
(Anonymous) 2025-05-12 04:47 pm (UTC)(link)+1
(Anonymous) 2025-05-12 04:31 pm (UTC)(link)kri tells beck to let it go in the caps, and based on the fact that we’re all here now, they clearly haven’t let it go at all
Re: +1
(Anonymous) 2025-05-12 04:38 pm (UTC)(link)anon replies are a lot of "it's just a joke cant you take a joke lol" childish behavior. the mods point it out as godmodding, unless I misread the cap?
Re: +1
(Anonymous) - 2025-05-12 16:40 (UTC) - ExpandRe: +1
(Anonymous) - 2025-05-12 16:44 (UTC) - ExpandRe: +1
(Anonymous) - 2025-05-12 16:42 (UTC) - ExpandAYRT
(Anonymous) - 2025-05-12 16:50 (UTC) - ExpandRe: AYRT
(Anonymous) - 2025-05-12 17:30 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) 2025-05-12 05:03 pm (UTC)(link)Robin, you are also being extremely combative. Your frustration is noted and understandable, but you also have to let this go. Beck has said that she was uncomfortable with this decision being made without her. "But it's canon" and "but 3/5 of the cast agree with it" are not acceptable responses. Whether it's canon literally doesn't matter. Whether others in the cast agree doesn't matter. You can't make this call without everyone having a say. Some people don't supplement their portrayal of a character with supplementary "canon" because it's easily missed and can be refuted if it's not blatantly in the canon itself. You need to be cognizant of that and act more considerate in the future. However I will reiterate that, at this point, whether it's canon or not literally doesn't matter. Feelings were hurt not because of whether it was canon or not, but because of lack of inclusion. You cannot justify godmodding with insistence that something is canon, especially when it's basically a supplementary material.
Re: da
(Anonymous) 2025-05-12 05:04 pm (UTC)(link)I'll wait
Re: da
(Anonymous) 2025-05-12 04:27 pm (UTC)(link)It sits poorly that you barely try to be involved
bad take from the mods
Re: da
(Anonymous) 2025-05-12 04:28 pm (UTC)(link)Re: da
(Anonymous) 2025-05-12 04:29 pm (UTC)(link)did the bad caps tell you the same or are you just picking & choosing, beck
Re: da
(Anonymous) 2025-05-12 05:17 pm (UTC)(link)Everyone involved in this is so over invested. It's not that deep.
Re: da
(Anonymous) 2025-05-12 05:21 pm (UTC)(link)lol first time?