Ryan Gosling (
ryanongosling) wrote in
wankgate2025-02-08 11:45 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
253: abandon me harder daddy

Please mark any spoilers clearly and try not to spoil stuff that hasn't even aired yet for people.
Keep the rules in mind.
LATEST PAGE | LATEST FLATVIEW PAGE
Game Hate | Canon Hate | Namedropping | Mods' Pet Peeves | Game Pet Peeves | Plurk Pet Peeves | Meme Pet Peeves
Report stupid shit here.
Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK
(Anonymous) 2025-05-20 06:55 pm (UTC)(link)He runs off like a little brat to whine about how he is so persecuted without any deets aside from "trust me bro".
Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK
(Anonymous) 2025-05-20 07:01 pm (UTC)(link)sa
(Anonymous) 2025-05-20 08:41 pm (UTC)(link)what i saw in the megaplurk were some misunderstandings of how the trait list at ryslig worked, but not any intentional racism. i'd be happy to copy and paste the conversation here so we don't have to assume people are actually clicking or reading that far down on the link. :) i just want to make sure we're seeing the same things.
Re: sa
(Anonymous) 2025-05-20 08:51 pm (UTC)(link)secondly, there is no acceptable situation where "black" and "bitch" are acceptable trait descriptions for a black woman whether or not those traits are being used to assign a monster. describing a person as simply "black" is meaningless and racist because blackness is not a fucking monolith. that is the part that is racist you idiots
Re: sa
(Anonymous) 2025-05-20 09:54 pm (UTC)(link)***
whedon’s bmc
yeah like the advice i was given for the trait list was it had to be supported in the personality section so i (absolutely mistakenly) internalized it as a summary of my personality section because that's mostly how it worked in 2013, the last time i was in ryslig
whedon’s bmc
and i was like "right well the most important trait to me, a person of color, is the jumble of facts and character traits derived from being japanese when white men mansplain anime to me so"
whedon’s bmc
"logically, this is a good and representative trait for a summary of this character"
━BIG SH✪T☆゚.*・。
i completely understood your logic tbh, R, I think the real issue just comes in to because of the way the sorting system works it then puts the mods (which I understand are majority white, if not majority non-black) in the position of choosing which monster aligns with blackness itself
━BIG SH✪T☆゚.*・。
which coming from nonblack people can become ~diceyyyy~ but I thought it was fairly obvious you meant to encapsulate her experience, not trivialize it
***
it looks to me like it was never about r assuming black people are a monolith. r states here that they were struggling to find a word to summarize their personality section (which involves the experience of being black) and went with something they, another person of color, would have chosen if they had to embody the "facts and character traits derived from being japanese" in a single word.
how is acknowledging how someone's race interacts with their history and shapes their personality racist?
and then the most pertinent question is: what does this have to do with luc? other than him saying that he understood how r got to that conclusion (as another person who is non-white and also non-black) but ultimately didn't want anyone else to perceive r or the mods as racist over this misunderstanding and agreed "black" as a trait was the wrong move?
Re: sa
(Anonymous) 2025-05-20 10:43 pm (UTC)(link)> there is nothing about race in the canon whatsoever, it was invented wholesale by R so she never needed a word to describe the experience of being black at all (https://wankgate.dreamwidth.org/65798.html?thread=264038918#cmt264038918 from when i remembered the last time someone tried to bring this up)
it involves luc because luc agrees with and stands by this person to this day so every time people trot this shit out to debate it again we all get treated to the reminder of how bad these takes are.
Re: sa
(Anonymous) 2025-05-21 12:20 am (UTC)(link)i think some of these folks have been spinning that plurk for so long they lost the plot
Re: sa
(Anonymous) 2025-05-21 12:49 am (UTC)(link)da
(Anonymous) 2025-05-21 01:19 am (UTC)(link)that reply just seems incredibly personal and it makes me worried that you've been suffering in silence for too long. you should try reaching out!
Re: da
(Anonymous) 2025-05-21 01:23 am (UTC)(link)Re: da
(Anonymous) 2025-05-21 01:33 am (UTC)(link)youre kind of making my case for me
Re: da
(Anonymous) 2025-05-21 01:56 am (UTC)(link)> luc recently was made to know he is ALSO unwelcome in golden peacock
you: THIS IS ALL BITTERNESS
i mean, aight. if that helps you sleep at night.
Re: da
(Anonymous) 2025-05-21 02:06 am (UTC)(link)Re: da
(Anonymous) - 2025-05-21 02:53 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2025-05-21 02:54 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2025-05-21 03:31 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) 2025-05-21 02:39 am (UTC)(link)are you okay
Re: da
(Anonymous) 2025-05-21 03:29 am (UTC)(link)Re: da
(Anonymous) 2025-05-21 01:37 am (UTC)(link)Re: da
(Anonymous) 2025-05-21 02:03 am (UTC)(link)i think this person (or people) need to confront their issues. either they can address them and get their apologies or they can keep harping on the same wank that we'll scroll past every new post. i'm just looking for a solution to a problem that never needed to be ours in the first place.
Re: da
(Anonymous) 2025-05-21 02:07 am (UTC)(link)that sounds personal to me.
Re: da
(Anonymous) 2025-05-21 02:29 am (UTC)(link)post wank or shut up
Re: da
(Anonymous) 2025-05-21 02:09 am (UTC)(link)Re: da
(Anonymous) - 2025-05-21 02:17 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2025-05-21 02:22 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2025-05-21 02:26 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2025-05-21 02:36 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2025-05-21 02:37 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2025-05-21 02:59 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2025-05-21 11:31 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2025-05-21 02:57 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) 2025-05-21 02:10 am (UTC)(link)Either way you are not gonna successfully argue this wank away here on wankgate. Also like, some might make it out like it is very normal to vent about stuff on plurk and complain about other rpers, but actually Luc's doing that and opening the plurk to 200 others including mods was a pretty unusual thing to do. None of my plurk friends have ever done that. I have never done that. And while there's people I dislike in this hobby, I am not in the habit of dropping them on wankgate either. Some people in this hobby might dislike me and I've never been namedropped here.
I am pretty indifferent to the guy myself, and I hope he is having an ok life, but I wouldn't play with him. Why would I want to play with somebody who handles the irritations of rp like that when I could instead rp with many rpers who have never done anything like that? Anon attempts to deflect aside, it is not "business as usual" in rp to make that sort of plurk.
Re: da
(Anonymous) - 2025-05-21 16:52 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2025-05-21 19:36 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2025-05-21 19:58 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2025-05-21 21:30 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2025-05-21 22:41 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2025-05-22 00:15 (UTC) - Expand+1
(Anonymous) - 2025-05-22 00:34 (UTC) - ExpandRe: +1
(Anonymous) - 2025-05-22 01:39 (UTC) - ExpandRe: +1
(Anonymous) - 2025-05-22 02:00 (UTC) - ExpandRe: +1
(Anonymous) - 2025-05-22 02:00 (UTC) - ExpandRe: +1
(Anonymous) - 2025-05-22 02:13 (UTC) - ExpandRe: +1
(Anonymous) - 2025-05-22 02:19 (UTC) - Expand+1
(Anonymous) - 2025-05-22 04:10 (UTC) - ExpandRe: +1
(Anonymous) - 2025-05-22 16:10 (UTC) - ExpandRe: +1
(Anonymous) - 2025-05-22 17:06 (UTC) - ExpandRe: +1
(Anonymous) - 2025-05-22 17:12 (UTC) - ExpandRe: +1
(Anonymous) - 2025-05-22 21:38 (UTC) - ExpandRe: +1
(Anonymous) - 2025-05-22 02:19 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2025-05-22 05:41 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2025-05-22 16:16 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) 2025-05-21 02:22 am (UTC)(link)this player gets namedropped just as infrequently as any other low tier wanker, so going on about ~being concerned for the anons~ and ~looking for a solution~ to pretty tame wank just sounds like poorly performed concern trolling as a deflection tbh. i didn't know much about them before but i'm definitely glad they're being gatekept now
Re: da
(Anonymous) 2025-05-21 02:35 am (UTC)(link)just maybe
several people might actually have a problem with this person and you just don't agree with them
Re: da
(Anonymous) - 2025-05-21 02:50 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2025-05-21 02:52 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2025-05-21 03:03 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) 2025-05-21 11:44 am (UTC)(link)I remembered hearing about this back then and was surprised to find it still up. screenshot while you can because once Luc catches wind it'll be deleted.
Re: da
(Anonymous) - 2025-05-21 13:24 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2025-05-21 13:54 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2025-05-21 22:36 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
Re: da
(Anonymous) - 2025-05-31 16:00 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2025-05-31 17:03 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2025-05-31 18:02 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2025-05-31 18:51 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2025-05-31 17:05 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2025-05-31 18:35 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2025-05-21 14:24 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2025-05-21 17:22 (UTC) - ExpandRe: sa
(Anonymous) 2025-05-21 01:08 am (UTC)(link)It's really easy to use nice language about being antiracist and a lot harder to admit to your own and your friends' mistakes.