Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK

(Anonymous) 2025-05-20 06:55 pm (UTC)(link)
Hmmmm he was a big old racist to black players voicing concern about a black character app being full of unnecessary racism. He throws shitfits at being DNI'd because apparently only he's allowed to tell people no and not the other way around. Hell as soon as it looks like mods are no longer patting his ass?

He runs off like a little brat to whine about how he is so persecuted without any deets aside from "trust me bro".

Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK

(Anonymous) 2025-05-20 07:01 pm (UTC)(link)
if you can bring receipts, i'll believe you. in the meantime, you're really not looking much better. this is as "trust me bro" as you can get.

sa

(Anonymous) 2025-05-20 08:41 pm (UTC)(link)
so i reviewed the post just to make sure, because if that's the case i would like to know, especially as a person of color.

what i saw in the megaplurk were some misunderstandings of how the trait list at ryslig worked, but not any intentional racism. i'd be happy to copy and paste the conversation here so we don't have to assume people are actually clicking or reading that far down on the link. :) i just want to make sure we're seeing the same things.

Re: sa

(Anonymous) 2025-05-20 08:51 pm (UTC)(link)
gonna stop you right there chief because this argument comes up every time as if ryslig wasn't a game that was around for many years at that point, so you are actually stupid if this is true.

secondly, there is no acceptable situation where "black" and "bitch" are acceptable trait descriptions for a black woman whether or not those traits are being used to assign a monster. describing a person as simply "black" is meaningless and racist because blackness is not a fucking monolith. that is the part that is racist you idiots

Re: sa

(Anonymous) 2025-05-20 09:54 pm (UTC)(link)
i looked ctrl+f'd for racism in the plurk and what was present were discussions of R (who is japanese) misunderstanding how the trait system worked at ryslig bc it had been a while since they played, and then a particular person trying to get them banned over that misunderstanding. if there are more i'd like to know, because it seems everything else discussing race is on the same topic.

***
whedon’s bmc
yeah like the advice i was given for the trait list was it had to be supported in the personality section so i (absolutely mistakenly) internalized it as a summary of my personality section because that's mostly how it worked in 2013, the last time i was in ryslig

whedon’s bmc
and i was like "right well the most important trait to me, a person of color, is the jumble of facts and character traits derived from being japanese when white men mansplain anime to me so"

whedon’s bmc
"logically, this is a good and representative trait for a summary of this character"

━BIG SH✪T☆゚.*・。
i completely understood your logic tbh, R, I think the real issue just comes in to because of the way the sorting system works it then puts the mods (which I understand are majority white, if not majority non-black) in the position of choosing which monster aligns with blackness itself

━BIG SH✪T☆゚.*・。
which coming from nonblack people can become ~diceyyyy~ but I thought it was fairly obvious you meant to encapsulate her experience, not trivialize it

***
it looks to me like it was never about r assuming black people are a monolith. r states here that they were struggling to find a word to summarize their personality section (which involves the experience of being black) and went with something they, another person of color, would have chosen if they had to embody the "facts and character traits derived from being japanese" in a single word.

how is acknowledging how someone's race interacts with their history and shapes their personality racist?

and then the most pertinent question is: what does this have to do with luc? other than him saying that he understood how r got to that conclusion (as another person who is non-white and also non-black) but ultimately didn't want anyone else to perceive r or the mods as racist over this misunderstanding and agreed "black" as a trait was the wrong move?

Re: sa

(Anonymous) 2025-05-20 10:43 pm (UTC)(link)
> guess what it would still be racist to describe someone's entire PERSONALITY as being "japanese" and being another kind of POC doesn't mean you can't be racist or that you don't need to learn that how you look at race might be misinformed and/or outright offensive to other people especially when choosing to engage in roleplay as other races

> there is nothing about race in the canon whatsoever, it was invented wholesale by R so she never needed a word to describe the experience of being black at all (https://wankgate.dreamwidth.org/65798.html?thread=264038918#cmt264038918 from when i remembered the last time someone tried to bring this up)

it involves luc because luc agrees with and stands by this person to this day so every time people trot this shit out to debate it again we all get treated to the reminder of how bad these takes are.

Re: sa

(Anonymous) 2025-05-21 12:20 am (UTC)(link)
i'm not here to argue over r's obvious and acknowledged ignorance bc this thread isnt about them, but i am letting you know that luc saying "we are all part of a racist system and every day need to each analyze our participation in that system because we are all capable of being racist without meaning to" is not only true but also not the words of someone who is looking to be racist or enable racism within his friends group.

i think some of these folks have been spinning that plurk for so long they lost the plot

Re: sa

(Anonymous) 2025-05-21 12:49 am (UTC)(link)
actions speak louder than empty words. he has never apologized or tried to do any better and acts like he is a victim at every opportunity so neither of them are beating the allegations

da

(Anonymous) 2025-05-21 01:19 am (UTC)(link)
are you the one waiting on an apology? it sounds like it. or like maybe you know the people that are? i know for a fact that he publicly made up with at least one person on the megalist, so why do you think he would be unwilling to apologize to anyone else?

that reply just seems incredibly personal and it makes me worried that you've been suffering in silence for too long. you should try reaching out!

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2025-05-21 01:23 am (UTC)(link)
delusional ass anon

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2025-05-21 01:33 am (UTC)(link)
its fine if you dont want a solution, but that just makes it more obvious that this is someone namedropping for bitterness sake

youre kind of making my case for me

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2025-05-21 01:56 am (UTC)(link)
> luc is banned and prebanned from multiple games
> luc recently was made to know he is ALSO unwelcome in golden peacock




you: THIS IS ALL BITTERNESS

i mean, aight. if that helps you sleep at night.

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2025-05-21 02:06 am (UTC)(link)
are you allergic to making a point or just confronting your issues?

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-21 02:53 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-21 02:54 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-21 03:31 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2025-05-21 02:39 am (UTC)(link)
??????? he was clearly namedropped because a known wanker was banned and that's interesting

are you okay

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2025-05-21 03:29 am (UTC)(link)
im fine thanks for asking

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2025-05-21 01:37 am (UTC)(link)
this comes across as super patronizing and disingenuous anon.

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2025-05-21 02:03 am (UTC)(link)
for years ive been watching this name come up in different games and namedrops with nothing new to add to it. and it always seems like it's that same person (or few people) fishing for deets on stuff that -never comes-. have you not noticed that? is that not at least a little concerning?

i think this person (or people) need to confront their issues. either they can address them and get their apologies or they can keep harping on the same wank that we'll scroll past every new post. i'm just looking for a solution to a problem that never needed to be ours in the first place.

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2025-05-21 02:07 am (UTC)(link)
for years? why this name? what is it about this one name upsets you to see them coming up repeatedly on wg?

that sounds personal to me.

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2025-05-21 02:29 am (UTC)(link)
the luc name. i keep getting excited that something good will hit and it never does, its just the same wankers obsessing over the same guy for the same shit and i need them to get a grip.

post wank or shut up

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2025-05-21 02:09 am (UTC)(link)
the thing is anon, luc isn't sorry.

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-21 02:17 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-21 02:22 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-21 02:26 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-21 02:36 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-21 02:37 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-21 02:59 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-21 11:31 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-21 02:57 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2025-05-21 02:10 am (UTC)(link)
DDA

Either way you are not gonna successfully argue this wank away here on wankgate. Also like, some might make it out like it is very normal to vent about stuff on plurk and complain about other rpers, but actually Luc's doing that and opening the plurk to 200 others including mods was a pretty unusual thing to do. None of my plurk friends have ever done that. I have never done that. And while there's people I dislike in this hobby, I am not in the habit of dropping them on wankgate either. Some people in this hobby might dislike me and I've never been namedropped here.

I am pretty indifferent to the guy myself, and I hope he is having an ok life, but I wouldn't play with him. Why would I want to play with somebody who handles the irritations of rp like that when I could instead rp with many rpers who have never done anything like that? Anon attempts to deflect aside, it is not "business as usual" in rp to make that sort of plurk.

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-21 16:52 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-21 19:36 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-21 19:58 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-21 21:30 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-21 22:41 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-22 00:15 (UTC) - Expand

+1

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-22 00:34 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-22 01:39 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-22 02:00 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-22 02:00 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-22 02:13 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-22 02:19 (UTC) - Expand

+1

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-22 04:10 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-22 16:10 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-22 17:06 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-22 17:12 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-22 21:38 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-22 02:19 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-22 05:41 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-22 16:16 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2025-05-21 02:22 am (UTC)(link)
"for years"

this player gets namedropped just as infrequently as any other low tier wanker, so going on about ~being concerned for the anons~ and ~looking for a solution~ to pretty tame wank just sounds like poorly performed concern trolling as a deflection tbh. i didn't know much about them before but i'm definitely glad they're being gatekept now

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2025-05-21 02:35 am (UTC)(link)
do you think that maybe instead of your conspiracy theory of this being all one grudgeanon fishing for deets for years

just maybe

several people might actually have a problem with this person and you just don't agree with them

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-21 02:50 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-21 02:52 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-21 03:03 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2025-05-21 11:44 am (UTC)(link)
driveby anon here but if you really want more 'recent' wank, here's unhinged Luc behavior from december 2023: https://getmeoutofthedraft.dreamwidth.org/612.html?thread=363876#cmt363876

I remembered hearing about this back then and was surprised to find it still up. screenshot while you can because once Luc catches wind it'll be deleted.

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-21 13:24 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-21 13:54 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-21 22:36 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

[personal profile] getmeoutofthedraft - 2025-05-31 14:44 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-31 16:00 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-31 17:03 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-31 18:02 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-31 18:51 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-31 17:05 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-31 18:35 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-21 14:24 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-21 17:22 (UTC) - Expand

Re: sa

(Anonymous) 2025-05-21 01:08 am (UTC)(link)
He can say that, maybe even sincerely believe it, and still have misses and blind spots of his own. And then, when called out on those misses, he might choose to double down and not acknowledge when he screwed the pooch.

It's really easy to use nice language about being antiracist and a lot harder to admit to your own and your friends' mistakes.