dda

(Anonymous) 2016-04-07 07:11 pm (UTC)(link)
i just want to point out here that 'knowing better' has nothing to do with age and everything to do with personality. there are sixteen year olds that 'know better', but some people are just doormats or clueless to the motivations of others. the thing about murgy is that she doesn't actually have any malicious intent with anything she does. she's just one of those kind of clueless types that goes along with people without really making her own opinion about it. she doesn't do confrontation (from what i've seen) and she's not a negative/snarky/bitchy person. she's 'nice' in that way that people are when they can't stand up for themselves and have never wanted to and oblivious in that she doesn't see people doing bad things.

Re: dda

(Anonymous) 2016-04-07 08:58 pm (UTC)(link)
it doesn't take much of a brain to figure out what gen and kippur were doing was anything but nice.

Re: dda

(Anonymous) 2016-04-07 09:33 pm (UTC)(link)
they're also manipulative fucks and someone like murgy is an easy target for manipulators. look how she got sucked in by karra and her minions.

Re: dda

(Anonymous) 2016-04-07 09:54 pm (UTC)(link)
here's the thing if you and i were apart of this we'd be marched through here like we killed a puppy. and rightfully so. murgy gets a free bill for being nice and stupid? this bothers me because nice and stupid can only get you so far. is she on the same levels as gen and kippur? no. but she's still got to be accountable for what happened here no more than anyone else would be.

Re: dda

(Anonymous) 2016-04-07 09:56 pm (UTC)(link)
yeah, but what exactly did she do in this situation except be a mod in a game that was disintegrating?

Re: dda

(Anonymous) 2016-04-07 10:07 pm (UTC)(link)
apparently she was the other mod who gave the go-ahead for that second post.

Re: dda

(Anonymous) 2016-04-07 10:09 pm (UTC)(link)
ok, but what was she told? we know from that pastebin that gen is good at talking total bullshit that sounds reasonable, but is total crap.

Re: dda

(Anonymous) 2016-04-07 11:48 pm (UTC)(link)
you're right. for all we know those two could have had an im chat between the three of them, murgy is told something else, and it all boils down from there.

Re: dda

(Anonymous) 2016-04-07 11:49 pm (UTC)(link)
or she could have been told nothing specific other than "we want to keep the game going".

Re: dda

(Anonymous) 2016-04-07 09:57 pm (UTC)(link)
yeah, but you and i aren't nice and stupid. most people that get dragged up here are one or the other. like selwyn. not nice, but very stupid. most people that get brought up here do things with actual intent. murgy hasn't actually done anything. she's just been around it and hasn't distanced herself. why? because she's nice and stupid. the only thing she's accountable for is bad taste in friends, but we've all got that one friend (or, let's be real are the one friend)

Re: dda

(Anonymous) 2016-04-07 10:03 pm (UTC)(link)
then she needs someone who can smack some fucking sense into her head.

Re: dda

(Anonymous) 2016-04-07 10:06 pm (UTC)(link)
unfortunately that's difficult because you know the people you're warning her about will find out and unleash their crazy on you.

Re: dda

(Anonymous) 2016-04-07 10:10 pm (UTC)(link)
most nice and stupid people do. just like those types that fall for email scams or scams in general. there are a lot of people that are just that kind of clueless and guileless that are easy targets. sometimes they're actual targets, like in the case of conartists, but other times, it's just the bad luck of having an asshole fall in the same social circle as a dupe. and murgy is a dupe. so yeah, she keeps getting brought up here, not for shit she's done, but for the people she's around. at this point, it's just scrollworthy unless she herself actually winds up doing something like selwyn or kronk or w/e. being on the mod team and dropping as shit hits the fan doesn't make her part of the takeover attempt. she did what people like her do; got out when she got uncomfortable because conflict isn't in her nature. the worst you can say is that she doesn't have a spine. that's not wankworthy.

Re: dda

(Anonymous) 2016-04-07 10:34 pm (UTC)(link)
why are you so determined to prove her innocence?

maybe she's as much of a manipulative shitstain as gen and kippur?????

Re: dda

(Anonymous) 2016-04-07 10:49 pm (UTC)(link)
then provide evidence, anon.

the only thing we're pointing out is that there is all this dirt proving how much of a manipulative shitstain gen is, how much of a greedy bitch kippur is, and how much of a total lunatic that kitt player is. yet we have nothing that shows murgy being a piece of shit or an insincere bullshit artist. she's also not even in the game anymore, so how she was supposed to take over a game she's not even in is quite a feat.

that's the thing for this, anon. we have a lot of evidence for everyone else, but the only thing we have on murgy is your absolute grudgewanky insistence that she's the mastermind of this whole thing and is actually satan reborn.

we follow the trail of evidence, anon. sorry to disappoint with our refusal to be your army.

Re: dda

(Anonymous) 2016-04-08 01:24 am (UTC)(link)
pastebin anon has confirmed multiple times that Murgy was the other mod involved in the takeover. she's in the takeover plurk. there is evidence everywhere, you just don't want to see it.

Re: dda

(Anonymous) 2016-04-08 01:25 am (UTC)(link)
again

involved how?

Re: dda

(Anonymous) 2016-04-08 04:26 am (UTC)(link)
I think they're a MEDIATOR

http://wankgate.dreamwidth.org/43251.html?thread=170432755#cmt170432755

(Anonymous) 2016-04-08 01:49 am (UTC)(link)
that's the confirmation i see. giving the go-ahead to write a post that hey, maybe she thought was okay depending on what was being told to her is not the same as trying to sneak a fucking game away from a mod who wants to close it.

http://pastebin.com/L6h1yxch

reading the pastebin here, i see one 'i'd like to help but i can't do it alone' in terms of keeping the game open and an 'agreed' to moving the conversation to the post. how this becomes 'part of the mastermind plot to steal the game' in your mind is beyond me.

if you don't like her, just admit you have a grudgeboner for her for an unexplainable reason beyond that you do. stop trying to twist shit to make it seem like you're justified. sometimes people just don't like people. it happens. but the reason people are giving you a weird look is because you keep saying shit like it's gospel and saying 'well, she was IN the plurk, therefore it means she was the ringleader'. she wasn't. gen was. she just didn't have the backbone to do anything beyond dropping the game and mod post.

sa

(Anonymous) 2016-04-08 01:51 am (UTC)(link)
even in this link: http://wankgate.dreamwidth.org/43251.html?thread=170352883#cmt170352883

pastebin anon says: "my friend has told me it was murgy and kippur who were the two mods who agreed to post the post and gen wrote it, and their source on that was unsurprisingly gen."

you see the problem people are having here? gen's writing the report here and you're gobbling the fiction as fact.

Re: sa

(Anonymous) 2016-04-08 03:22 am (UTC)(link)
why don't you admit you have a fetish for white knighting murgy?

murgy has never flat-out denied being the third mod involved here. even kippur hasn't jumped up to defend her. if she wasn't involved why the hell not say so?

Re: sa

(Anonymous) - 2016-04-08 04:00 (UTC) - Expand

Re: sa

(Anonymous) - 2016-04-08 06:26 (UTC) - Expand

Re: sa

(Anonymous) - 2016-04-08 06:30 (UTC) - Expand

ayrt

(Anonymous) - 2016-04-08 06:58 (UTC) - Expand

Re: http://wankgate.dreamwidth.org/43251.html?thread=170432755#cmt170432755

(Anonymous) 2016-04-08 03:31 am (UTC)(link)
"i'd like to help but i can't do it alone' isn't evidence enough for you?

really?

also i'd gladly bet on the idea of kippur being the person who was the actual ringleader, with gen pushing hard enough from behind. kippur's the quietest and likeliest the silent mamba in this all. murgy may have the least amount of influence, but she's involved and never denied she was involved.

Re: http://wankgate.dreamwidth.org/43251.html?thread=170432755#cmt170432755

(Anonymous) 2016-04-08 04:02 am (UTC)(link)
do you not understand context? she'd like to help keep the game open, but she can't do modding/coding whatever alone. that's what that was in relation to. not 'gee guys, help me take over this thing because more assholes are better than one'.

Re: dda

(Anonymous) 2016-04-07 11:37 pm (UTC)(link)
i'm the anon above and even i don't think she's a manipulative shitstain. if you have more deets then cough them up.

Re: dda

(Anonymous) 2016-04-07 11:41 pm (UTC)(link)
five question marks.

on a sentence that isn't even a question.

my, someone's handflappy today.