Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2018-04-03 03:45 am (UTC)(link)
as someone who was considering apping, deets?

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2018-04-03 05:13 am (UTC)(link)
ok disclaimer - not in the game but by and large it seems a good basket of eggs - cool characters, chill players, mods who are active and present with plot/npcs BUT player plot went up this weekend that has me side eying hard

https://hadriel-ooc.dreamwidth.org/208403.html
https://hadriel-logs.dreamwidth.org/143283.html

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2018-04-03 07:40 am (UTC)(link)
is someone really content warning for a misogynistic slur on the word 'bitch'? twice?

+1

(Anonymous) 2018-04-03 08:51 am (UTC)(link)
mte reading it

da

(Anonymous) 2018-04-03 02:46 pm (UTC)(link)
above anon is right. the game overall is amazing but this player plot has been a hassle, especially on plurk where the demon oc's mun has shot down pretty much every way to kill her because dnd demons are powerful.

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2018-04-03 03:28 pm (UTC)(link)
how can they be a dnd demon when hadriel's rules don't allow tabletop ocs?

da

(Anonymous) 2018-04-03 03:32 pm (UTC)(link)
I went to look this up upon reading this comment, and I'm surprised but you're right in that tabletop characters and player characters in MMOs aren't allowed. There are several characters of this type in game though, so it might depend on just how much story is built, and whether they cross over from just a tabletop character into being an actual OC with a developed original world.

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2018-04-03 06:36 pm (UTC)(link)
I was told they're allowed on a case by case basis. Not sure why it's not in the rules yet.

(Anonymous) 2018-04-03 04:44 pm (UTC)(link)
as someone who was going to jump into this plot, that's why i'm avoiding it. we're not playing dnd, so using dnd logic to argue why no one else could touch her makes no sense. besides, aren't the adventure zone/other tabletop characters we've got running around also very powerful and of a high level? the demon oc's mun is making all of this much more complicated than it needs to be, and then keeps making comments on plurk about how no one is doing anything.

(Anonymous) 2018-04-03 06:10 pm (UTC)(link)
not in this game but even by dnd rules your taz cast has a pair of liches in it and a guy who saved the multiverse by making a taco, you should be golden lmao

(Anonymous) 2018-04-03 09:06 pm (UTC)(link)
Three liches if you count the antagonist one. So the fact that the demon oc mun keeps acting like even they can't touch her is... absolutely hilarious.

(Anonymous) 2018-04-03 09:17 pm (UTC)(link)
oh shit i forgot lydia. LMAO this bitch should be dust already, where's evard's black tentacles when you need it

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2018-04-03 23:04 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2018-04-04 12:10 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2018-04-03 11:09 pm (UTC)(link)
hilariously it looks like most of the powerful d&ds are pointedly sitting out or just aren't getting involved for whatever reason, lol.

(Anonymous) 2018-04-03 11:23 pm (UTC)(link)
don't blame them, honestly. who wants to make their character hold the stupid ball so somebody else can play raid boss?

i want to give the demon mun the benefit of the doubt and say they probably just don't want one person wandering up and smacking her character down, but when you're playing panfandom, you're bound to bump up against some characters stronger than yours. blatant "look how big my balls are" antagonists who swing their weight around don't really work in dwrp because of that.

i'm less sympathetic if they've really been complaining on plurk about nobody indulging them. can we get some pastebins or snippets?

ayrt

(Anonymous) 2018-04-03 11:31 pm (UTC)(link)
naw that's what i meant. i'm betting they know better and don't want to go near this plot. some of the sounded like they were into it originally too but now they're sitting out.

Re: ayrt

(Anonymous) - 2018-04-03 23:37 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2018-04-03 11:41 pm (UTC)(link)
There's a 500 comment plurk to pull from so I'm cherrypicking as best I can without cutting too many details...

https://pastebin.com/0nf21Kgv
https://pastebin.com/AaT0UaE8

Some shorter snippets: https://pastebin.com/CmLz9QNd

And my personal favorite moment, when a group organizes to tackle Caedra head-on: https://pastebin.com/kqcGQMTs

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2018-04-04 00:19 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2018-04-04 00:24 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2018-04-04 02:28 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2018-04-04 02:34 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2018-04-04 02:42 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2018-04-04 03:14 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2018-04-04 02:36 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2018-04-04 03:16 (UTC) - Expand

+1

(Anonymous) - 2018-04-04 02:40 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2018-04-04 02:45 (UTC) - Expand

+1

(Anonymous) - 2018-04-04 03:11 (UTC) - Expand

+1

(Anonymous) - 2018-04-04 13:52 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2018-04-05 12:45 am (UTC)(link)
after all of that, the player decided to have one character solve the entire thing and toss everyone else out of the plot.

(Anonymous) 2018-04-05 12:50 am (UTC)(link)
deets, this sounds like some "things didn't work out the way i wanted them to so i'm taking my ball and going home" shit going down

(Anonymous) 2018-04-05 12:54 am (UTC)(link)
Well the player either found this thread or someone told them about it, so here's the resulting chaos. It's long but may as well include everything.

https://pastebin.com/N7sWXSzT

(Anonymous) 2018-04-05 01:06 am (UTC)(link)
i skimmed but i don't see chaos here? she seems embarrassed but like she's trying to be reasonable about it now idgi

(Anonymous) 2018-04-05 02:16 am (UTC)(link)
Honestly everyone in there seems very reasonable? I was expecting to at least see an argument but they're just discussing the missteps and deciding to keep things simple.

+1

(Anonymous) 2018-04-05 04:18 am (UTC)(link)
looks less like chaos and more like she realized she'd messed up and wanted to fix it? and the resulting discussion was completely respectable? no ones even bitching so i don't know what you're seeing mate.

(Anonymous) 2018-04-05 04:44 am (UTC)(link)
chaos is a poor choice of words but i can see how this would be a nightmare logistically speaking? idk trying to read it with the other anon's comment about tossing everyone else out of the plot, it does sound like a few people wanted to get involved like she was asking for but now that's all getting scrapped?

still a far cry from chaos, but i'm seeing why the players are frustrated.

(Anonymous) 2018-04-05 08:05 pm (UTC)(link)
...wow i'm impressed. a player taking responsibility, criticism, and is ready to improve for the next time around? that's legit great

honestly this proves those original points brought up by anons talking about this - hadriel is essentially a good game with good people

(Anonymous) 2018-04-05 08:07 pm (UTC)(link)
wish i could play there tbh, but the few crazies i know are there are crazy enough that i wouldn't wish them on my worst enemy.

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2018-04-05 20:10 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2018-04-05 20:15 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2018-04-06 07:38 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2018-04-06 22:07 (UTC) - Expand

da

(Anonymous) - 2018-04-06 20:38 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2018-04-06 20:41 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2018-04-06 20:53 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2018-04-07 07:58 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2018-04-07 08:51 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2018-04-07 08:53 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2018-04-07 11:11 (UTC) - Expand