242: what kind of feet do you like?

[ryanongosling]

Please mark any spoilers clearly and try not to spoil stuff that hasn't even aired yet for people.

Keep the rules in mind.

LATEST PAGE | LATEST FLATVIEW PAGE

Game Hate | Canon Hate | Namedropping | Mods' Pet Peeves | Game Pet Peeves | Plurk Pet Peeves | Meme Pet Peeves

Report stupid shit here.

Comments

Re: JIGOKU-CHO

[(Anonymous)]

the first person to replurk it was immediately dragged through the mud, so i wouldn't replurk it either.

Re: JIGOKU-CHO

[(Anonymous)]

not surprising wgers are self sabotaging cowards though

Re: JIGOKU-CHO

[(Anonymous)]

That’s the problem. If anyone in radius of gsai’s reach replurks, he’ll set his attack squad on them. Speaking as someone in the game, I don’t want to get pushed out by his asskissers.

Re: JIGOKU-CHO

[(Anonymous)]

If you aren't a wanker yourself doing the exact same thing you'll probably be just fine.

Re: JIGOKU-CHO

[(Anonymous)]

trek wasn't lying to people like you were gonsai it's not the defense you think it is

Re: JIGOKU-CHO

[(Anonymous)]

Defending racists sure is a hill for trek to pick to die on.

Re: JIGOKU-CHO

[(Anonymous)]

making things up isn't helping your case either

Re: JIGOKU-CHO

[(Anonymous)]

i don't think anyone's attacking people who replurked it. people should be aware that trek is doing the same shit gsai is doing if the crime here is having a wanky history and not openly declaring you're modding a public game. if anything, you gonsai antis should jump on this because it makes your grudgewank seem less personal

Re: JIGOKU-CHO

[(Anonymous)]

come sail away has the mod named on the mod contact page tho

Re: JIGOKU-CHO

[(Anonymous)]

i was the anon who was checking around the game pages this morning looking for mentions of the mod name on the faq and that was DEFINITELY edited in the past few hours because all it said as of this morning was "hello".

Re: JIGOKU-CHO

[(Anonymous)]

okay

what more do you want, a personal apology? the problem is solved.

Re: JIGOKU-CHO

[(Anonymous)]

yes trek i do want one

Re: JIGOKU-CHO

[(Anonymous)]

No one cares about the people who replurked it. People are just pointing out OP is a wanker with a history themselves.

I thought anon was a player in the game the entire time but they aren’t. I think it’s weird that op isn’t even in the game but they’re so invested in Jigoku drama. It makes me wonder if they’re really concerned about Jigoku players or if they’re just trying to stir shit in a game they have nothing to do with.

I didn’t know they were Sail mod but the fact that they weren’t exactly open about their own modding while trying to expose another mod team was also weird to me.

No one can deny the evidence in the plurk but I can’t blame people for not wanting to engage with it given who the source is. I wish it had been a player or someone more credible who made the plurk but at this point I think we just need to accept Jigoku players don’t care as much as anons want them to.

Re: JIGOKU-CHO

[(Anonymous)]

trek isn't the op. they just replurked it first.

da

[(Anonymous)]

this is the part where gonsai tries to gaslight anons into believing that some other wanker is A. the confirmed source of the deets and B. as bad if not worse

Re: JIGOKU-CHO

[(Anonymous)]

"trek is op" is in and of itself wild conjecture based on the fact that they replurked it first, anon

Re: JIGOKU-CHO

[(Anonymous)]

this whole thread’s reaction to the plurk and the mods non-response to the sock proving what anons predicted would happen when anons kept trying to push for “socks as a solution” to the whole thing

Re: JIGOKU-CHO

[(Anonymous)]

except for anons are directly pushing back against that happening

but go off i guess

Re: JIGOKU-CHO

[(Anonymous)]

the very comment i replied to is a conspiracy theory rant about the OP of the plurk being another well known wanker

but go off

i guess

Re: JIGOKU-CHO

[(Anonymous)]

the very comment you replied to already had two anons telling them to pound sand before you said shit




but go off














i guess

Re: JIGOKU-CHO

[(Anonymous)]

tbh at this point people really need to stop trying to make fetch happen because it's pretty clear no one cares as much as the angry anons want them to

+1

[(Anonymous)]

they tried. the game is thriving, too bad.

Re: +1

[(Anonymous)]

exactly. the plurk exists. people are free to replurk it if they want. the fact that no one is even doing that is a pretty big sign that no one cares.

Re: +1

[(Anonymous)]

seems like OP is trying to add supporting details to bump it in the form of digging up old plurks to take screenshots of as evidence but the evidence isn't exactly damning when it's just screenshots of someone peacefully accepting the ruling that they've been banned so i can't imagine why no one cares

Re: JIGOKU-CHO

[(Anonymous)]

Trek has never hidden that they're a wankgate regular. They frequently link threads and commentate about them on their plurk.