242: what kind of feet do you like?

[ryanongosling]

Please mark any spoilers clearly and try not to spoil stuff that hasn't even aired yet for people.

Keep the rules in mind.

LATEST PAGE | LATEST FLATVIEW PAGE

Game Hate | Canon Hate | Namedropping | Mods' Pet Peeves | Game Pet Peeves | Plurk Pet Peeves | Meme Pet Peeves

Report stupid shit here.

Comments

Re: JIGOKU-CHO

[(Anonymous)]

No one cares about the people who replurked it. People are just pointing out OP is a wanker with a history themselves.

I thought anon was a player in the game the entire time but they aren’t. I think it’s weird that op isn’t even in the game but they’re so invested in Jigoku drama. It makes me wonder if they’re really concerned about Jigoku players or if they’re just trying to stir shit in a game they have nothing to do with.

I didn’t know they were Sail mod but the fact that they weren’t exactly open about their own modding while trying to expose another mod team was also weird to me.

No one can deny the evidence in the plurk but I can’t blame people for not wanting to engage with it given who the source is. I wish it had been a player or someone more credible who made the plurk but at this point I think we just need to accept Jigoku players don’t care as much as anons want them to.

Re: JIGOKU-CHO

[(Anonymous)]

trek isn't the op. they just replurked it first.

da

[(Anonymous)]

this is the part where gonsai tries to gaslight anons into believing that some other wanker is A. the confirmed source of the deets and B. as bad if not worse

Re: JIGOKU-CHO

[(Anonymous)]

"trek is op" is in and of itself wild conjecture based on the fact that they replurked it first, anon

Re: JIGOKU-CHO

[(Anonymous)]

this whole thread’s reaction to the plurk and the mods non-response to the sock proving what anons predicted would happen when anons kept trying to push for “socks as a solution” to the whole thing

Re: JIGOKU-CHO

[(Anonymous)]

except for anons are directly pushing back against that happening

but go off i guess

Re: JIGOKU-CHO

[(Anonymous)]

the very comment i replied to is a conspiracy theory rant about the OP of the plurk being another well known wanker

but go off

i guess

Re: JIGOKU-CHO

[(Anonymous)]

the very comment you replied to already had two anons telling them to pound sand before you said shit




but go off














i guess

Re: JIGOKU-CHO

[(Anonymous)]

my point isn’t about people calling them out on their conspiracy

my point is that the response that happened to the sock who plurked about it and the sock who commented to the mods

go the exact responses people were expecting were going to happen

but keep going off


i guess

Re: JIGOKU-CHO

[(Anonymous)]

ok, and nobody here is letting it fly

so what's your point?

Re: JIGOKU-CHO

[(Anonymous)]

tbh at this point people really need to stop trying to make fetch happen because it's pretty clear no one cares as much as the angry anons want them to

+1

[(Anonymous)]

they tried. the game is thriving, too bad.

Re: +1

[(Anonymous)]

exactly. the plurk exists. people are free to replurk it if they want. the fact that no one is even doing that is a pretty big sign that no one cares.

Re: +1

[(Anonymous)]

seems like OP is trying to add supporting details to bump it in the form of digging up old plurks to take screenshots of as evidence but the evidence isn't exactly damning when it's just screenshots of someone peacefully accepting the ruling that they've been banned so i can't imagine why no one cares

Re: +1

[(Anonymous)]

it's really unfortunate that pastebin doesn't easily allow searching anymore, because that was how you found the really good old deets, but there is this! this is the big rpanons ban.

https://wankgate.dreamwidth.org/61712.html?thread=242361360#cmt242361360

and since you guys are worried that the wankgate name will chase people off:

the original thread that sparked the logged in meltdown: https://rpanons.dreamwidth.org/85878.html?thread=258069878#cmt258069878

pastebin of the meltdown: https://pastebin.com/US2y03fa

rpanon mod confirming that the original thread was gonsai and that they were such a piece of shit that the mods banned every account they have: https://rpanons.dreamwidth.org/85878.html?thread=258124662

this happened in 2021. this gives the context for why they were so set on lying about who was modding this game. they are still acting the way they did in 2009, and 2011, and 2015, and today. because gonsai will never change, and the next meltdown isn't an "if," but a "when."

Re: +1

[(Anonymous)]

this is apparently one of the threads given for "examples of gonsai acting like a douchebag to someone for absolutely zero reason:" https://rpanons.dreamwidth.org/85735.html?thread=257760743#cmt257760743

here are two more, but gonsai's comments were deleted, so you only get the bewildered responses: https://rpanons.dreamwidth.org/85878.html?thread=257794934#cmt257794934
https://rpanons.dreamwidth.org/85878.html?thread=257803126#cmt257803126

and, for fun, a latroma namedrop they were the most obvious anon ever on: https://wankgate.dreamwidth.org/40365.html?thread=159278509#cmt159278509

Re: +1

[(Anonymous)]

I'm sorry but I read through this waiting for the great big horrible thing that has everyone so upset about this and I don't see it?

It's exhausting and embarrassing but it seems like they're doing just fine getting themselves banned from things. I'm just wondering why this is PSA-worthy stuff especially compared to the other wankers we've seen that have been toxic and abusive in ways that got other people in trouble while they got away with it scot-free.

People should know so they can opt-out if they want to, but compared to other wankers this is pretty mild stuff ngl.

Re: +1

[(Anonymous)]

to me the musebox meltdown is still one of the funniest things ever produced by these communities

it's just so SO dumb and they care so much

Re: +1

[(Anonymous)]

the plurk itself IS very "wow! it's fucking nothing"

Re: +1

[(Anonymous)]

keep telling yourself that, gsai

Re: +1

[(Anonymous)]

it was meant to be evidence of gsai's various bans, not their shitty behavior

as in, that was the order of priorities

Re: +1

[(Anonymous)]

If only 7 people have reported it, we haven't seen the plurk existing. Can we get a link or something

Re: +1

[(Anonymous)]

https://www.plurk.com/p/ozh7oy

Re: +1

[(Anonymous)]

Thanks, anon.

Re: JIGOKU-CHO

[(Anonymous)]

Trek has never hidden that they're a wankgate regular. They frequently link threads and commentate about them on their plurk.