Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-04-24 09:25 am (UTC)(link)
i'm op. i don't play in games.

weirdly enough my desire for a plurk contact to @ everyone (by which i mean making a plurk everyone can see all at once, not specifically sending a ping) is motivated by a desire to be less social/less work for everyone involved? whenever i dm someone about hiatus, they usually respond, even if it's just a short "no worries" to demonstrate they've seen it - because it's a one-on-one conversation, and most people probably feel it's more courteous to acknowledge that kind of "personal" contact. i feel like a plurk post is more conducive to everyone just reading it, making note of it, and moving on with their day. if journals were still used for this kind of ooc purpose that would suit me too, but they aren't anymore.

anyway, as i said i get why people don't give out plurk or other socials. was just having a grumble because copy and pasting a message five times over a couple different platforms is slightly inconvenient.

(frozen comment)

(Anonymous) 2023-04-24 09:38 am (UTC)(link)
I wish we could go back to shitting on neckbeard lesbian futa rp without the trans women coming out of the woodwork to tell us about how their girl cocks are totally what every lesbian should definitely want in her life.

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-04-24 10:58 am (UTC)(link)
isn't this just bullying? vaguing about your mutuals in front of their gamemates on plurk is luc-tier bullshit

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-04-24 11:18 am (UTC)(link)
> people getting weird about things and being needy

i know this is just the way anglosphere culture works generally, but its objectively odd that it's not "weird" or "needy" to insist that all of your social contacts limit their communications just to things that are relevant to you personally. very cold, individualistic style of thinking about this, and triple odd in the community that values and prioritizes scrolling on bakerstreet.

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-04-24 11:48 am (UTC)(link)
if it was shiny it would have been worded like "I know it can be so hard to keep up with tags. But when you app into a game, you're included in the game with the expectation that your lovely tags will be contributing to the game. Without that, can a game even function? If [name of castmate of person being directly attacked, who has been in a private bitchfest with shiny about the slow tagger for WEEKS] isn't having fun playing [character] because of the low activity of another person, that's unfair to everyone."

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-04-24 11:54 am (UTC)(link)
stop trying to make random people not wanting to befriend you personally into a social issue

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-04-24 12:11 pm (UTC)(link)
this is 100% bullying, idk why op is happy to endorse it

if i was in that game i'd be taking caps of the plurk to the mods asap

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-04-24 12:30 pm (UTC)(link)
stop making your neurotic fixation on controlling other people's communications into a public policy

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-04-24 12:39 pm (UTC)(link)
?????

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-04-24 12:42 pm (UTC)(link)
you cant be both stupid and mean. pick one.

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-04-24 12:49 pm (UTC)(link)
link the comments which are trying to establish a public policy

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-04-24 12:53 pm (UTC)(link)
if complaining on wankgate is tantamount to creating a public policy we're all totally fucked lmao

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-04-24 12:58 pm (UTC)(link)
public policy: any unwanted social contact is identical to forcing people to be your friends, and should be dissuaded
https://wankgate.dreamwidth.org/64822.html?thread=259886390#cmt259886390
https://wankgate.dreamwidth.org/64822.html?thread=259857718#cmt259857718

public policy: you must use hiatus pages for hiatus notifications. that is also where other people must check your hiatus notification. do not @ everyone.
https://wankgate.dreamwidth.org/64822.html?thread=259864886#cmt259864886

public policy: do not be social
https://wankgate.dreamwidth.org/64822.html?thread=259860278#cmt259860278
https://wankgate.dreamwidth.org/64822.html?thread=259861558#cmt259861558

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-04-24 12:58 pm (UTC)(link)
methinks someone is just feeling called out for their [profile] s lmf

and i am sorry a single, or even multiple, wankgate users don't like it when you do that, that's always difficult to hear

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-04-24 12:58 pm (UTC)(link)
@ s

someday i will remember

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-04-24 12:59 pm (UTC)(link)
you sound defensive

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-04-24 01:00 pm (UTC)(link)
can't imagine why ppl don't like to talk to you

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-04-24 01:00 pm (UTC)(link)
you are very angry indeed that when a hobby involves cooperating with other people, those people might have different opinions than you, aren't you?

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-04-24 01:01 pm (UTC)(link)
if you want wank, at least make it make sense

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-04-24 01:01 pm (UTC)(link)
i am just telling you that i think its at least as weird that youre trying to make your extreme self-interest a demand that others must intuit and respect.

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-04-24 01:01 pm (UTC)(link)
it is sort of the opposite, no matter how mad you and the other anon get about this

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-04-24 01:02 pm (UTC)(link)
you're one of those people who overshares in group discord chats and then has a mental breakdown when nobody wants to pat your ass about it aren't you

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-04-24 01:02 pm (UTC)(link)
i don't think that a person simply posting "i prefer to communicate like this" is doing that but ok

you're heard

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-04-24 01:03 pm (UTC)(link)
I get increasingly angry the sloppier these retorts become so you're doing a fantastic job i guess

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-04-24 01:04 pm (UTC)(link)
til that having boundaries is "extreme self-interest"