Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-03-10 07:17 pm (UTC)(link)
why is it a problem? it's an option. live and let live.

it's like asking yourself why a private game that doesn't personally interest you has the right to exist. it's another venue for rpers who like what they like to hang out in.

memes still get crossposted off the love hotel now and then, and that's just the smut-only elder sibling of bakerstreet. let that one live too.

bakerstreet isn't going to run out of posts, guys. posts linking to comms you don't like won't kill you. chill.

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2023-03-10 07:23 pm (UTC)(link)
same. i'll go through periods of just not checking bs at all because it's the same shit every time, and then when i go back because i want to do random scenario or whatever and i'm scrolling through i'm surprised pikachu because it hasn't changed

clearly some people are still interested, but i don't think anyone can deny that most memes these days are way deader than they used to be, with the exceptions of stalwarts like tfln, random scenario, etc.

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-03-10 07:36 pm (UTC)(link)
right lol

ayrt

(Anonymous) 2023-03-10 07:40 pm (UTC)(link)
yeah, i would love to tag out and I'm a big proponent of doing so. however, when the options are blond/brunette normal person/random mythological oc, live action guy looking for 30+ only characters which cuts out a huge chunk of character choices for me, anime character around the right age for my character that's m/m only, genshin only open to castmates, canon with no information easily found... you get the idea. this isn't a dig on those types of players. at least they're posting. i just wish i saw more people in memes that weren't tfln or random scenario. possibly this could be mitigated if there were fewer memes, especially niche memes, altogether. i haven't seen a weather related meme for a couple of weeks, for example. the unusual words meme is another one that i haven't seen in a while. even some smut memes have wider appeal than the ones posted that slot each character into a pre-determined role.

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2023-03-10 07:41 pm (UTC)(link)
K have fun with your weird fantasy where they get apoplectic and you totally owned them

then you posted it on wankgate and everyone clapped

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2023-03-10 07:45 pm (UTC)(link)
you're right. there's no solution

make your own community? Nah that's cringe

make new and interesting memes? No that's way too hard

tag out lots to bolster activity on the memes you like? No everyone on there is boring

literally the only thing left to do is post here about it

Re: ayrt

(Anonymous) 2023-03-10 08:06 pm (UTC)(link)
the ones that slot each character into a pre-determined role are the ones that rustle my jimmies, that's not a meme that's a glorified rp with me

Just post to enablemeplz instead of filling up the comm with memes that only work for a narrow subset of characters paired off in super specific ways

Re: ayrt

(Anonymous) 2023-03-10 08:11 pm (UTC)(link)
same, it drives me nuts. so much of memes now are fishing for specific characters or character dynamics and it reflects in who people post to them, as well as what memes are posted. that's the real issue, not whatever this gen season smut season thing above is.

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-03-10 08:24 pm (UTC)(link)
if you think its so unpopular then why are you so upset about it

just shut up and stop boohooing about it and itll go away before the summer

it also costs 0 dollars and 0 cents to just keep playing on bs and minding your own business

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2023-03-10 08:36 pm (UTC)(link)
I don’t understand how indicating preference/boundaries in a permissions post wouldn’t solve this issue. Before I tag someone I typically take a peek at their permissions, especially if I’m looking to gear the thread towards something shippy. If someone doesn’t have permissions up, you can always check in which is normal and doesn’t take too much time anyway. I think having two communities to check would be more cumbersome than just sticking with the status quo etiquette.

(Anonymous) 2023-03-10 08:38 pm (UTC)(link)
this is the stupidest argument in the world

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-03-10 08:40 pm (UTC)(link)
i really do not understand why some ppl put OTA when they tag into memes but when i check their permissions in their account they clearly have an "m/m pref" like ??? can y'all please stop doing that? when you put ota (esp on shipping threads) that implies you are OPEN to ALL characters or genders. Or am I wrong?? IDK just feels misleading. it's especially worse when the account doesn't have anything on their account that tells me what they are okay with.

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-03-10 08:46 pm (UTC)(link)
wait wtf "esp on shipping threads"? are you saying that if i'm m/m pref i can't play *non-shipping* threads against pref?

Re: ayrt

(Anonymous) 2023-03-10 08:49 pm (UTC)(link)
yeah, they are trash memes

you know what, a comm that's bans those and has no stance on gen/shipping/smut would probably be great

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2023-03-10 08:52 pm (UTC)(link)
even assuming we have enough good memes in circulation (and/or in ayrt's head waiting unposted for some reason) excessive quantity is exhausting regardless of quality because we're all humans with finite time and energy

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-03-10 08:52 pm (UTC)(link)
maybe the m/m pref note in their journal is a general pref but today or on this meme specifically theyre ota

or perhaps thats old and theyve since changed what they like for that character

or perhaps if youre that interested you should just ask

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-03-10 08:53 pm (UTC)(link)
my dude, this is the part about info posts you're not going to like: people forget to update them. sometimes, they change their mind and characters they wanted to play exclusively m/m now appeal to them for m/f prospects too. and they don't recall to update the info post.

other times, they're just feeling like making an exception or trying out a different pairing type for this character they've only ever played as m/m.

just take the latest preference expressed (the one in the meme) as the current one.

Re: MEME PET PEEVES / op

(Anonymous) 2023-03-10 08:53 pm (UTC)(link)
no i'm specifically talking about shipping memes in this context. sorry if i worded this weirdly?? english is not my first language. not sure if i got my rant across

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2023-03-10 08:54 pm (UTC)(link)
same. one of my characters has a popular fanon ship that i don't like so i specifically have it listed as a "notp" in that character's permissions post. that way other people don't have to waste time asking or guessing whether i want to play that ship or not.

Re: ayrt

(Anonymous) 2023-03-10 08:56 pm (UTC)(link)
arent memes just glorified rp with me posts

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-03-10 08:57 pm (UTC)(link)
it's especially worse when the account doesn't have anything on their account that tells me what they are okay with.

they are telling you what they're okay with, though. that's why they put ota.

Re: ayrt

(Anonymous) 2023-03-10 08:59 pm (UTC)(link)
no, and that you think that makes me pity you

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-03-10 08:59 pm (UTC)(link)
the things other anons told you are true, but also we have a few dwrpers around who don't seem to realize OTA is in reference to genders

source: i've seen toplevels with OTA in the subject line where the comment text was something along the lines of "[m/f only]"

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-03-10 09:01 pm (UTC)(link)
that's changed then because i've definitely seen toplevels with eg "closed to canonmates" or "closed to x"

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-03-10 09:01 pm (UTC)(link)
I’d argue that a m/m pref doesn’t mean they’re not open to other things…? It’s just a preference. Kinda like being bi and leaning towards liking women more, but for the right guy you’ll also be open to them?