Re: da

(Anonymous) 2023-03-10 06:08 pm (UTC)(link)
we're not accusing you of refusing to play with us

that's what you weirdos do whenever you deliberately conflate "I don't want to play smut but that's always the most abundant option and it's frustrating" with "I believe all smut players are filthy whores"

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2023-03-10 06:22 pm (UTC)(link)
well what are you accusing us of, then? whats the big fuss all about? several solutions have been provided to the only actual problem anyone identified: that the sexy truth or dare meme had a sexy twist. here are the solutions for you again: play gen in the meme anyway, wait for the regular non-sexy truth or dare meme, post the truth or dare meme in the gen only channel, create new gen memes and post them, tag out on existing gen only memes.

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2023-03-10 06:27 pm (UTC)(link)
nayrt but i thought the original problem was just "bakerstreet gets spammed with sexy versions of memes where you can already play sex," not "people are playing sex and i feel excluded"

op

(Anonymous) 2023-03-10 06:41 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes.

I fucking love smut. Huge pervert.

My complaint is not and never about being excluded, that’s the straw man insecure offended by gen idiots use.

My complaint is that empty headed morons do stupid things.

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2023-03-10 10:13 pm (UTC)(link)
well, if you parent up it's pretty explicit

we're accusing people of pointlessly editing a meme that would otherwise be friendly to things other than smut so that it's only usable for smut, and then smugly saying "good" when people who didn't want to play smut pointed out that this wasn't much fun for them.

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2023-03-10 10:19 pm (UTC)(link)
lmao i love the twist you added at the end to make it all so malicious, when the reality is that particular poster is just an idiot who likes to play smut a lot and Smutty Truth or Dare is literally the only idea they ever come up with

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2023-03-10 10:23 pm (UTC)(link)
LICH'RALLY earlier in this very thread, in response to gen players pointing out how unthinkingly frustrating this was, people gleefully retorted that that was a feature rather than a bug.

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2023-03-10 10:24 pm (UTC)(link)
yeah people was me

because i know that poster and they're an idiot with only one idea

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2023-03-11 12:49 am (UTC)(link)
hey if it was the non smut version wouldn't it be forbidden to post as a repost of something thats on a schedule