245: Tone Death Rapture: Championship Edition : Tournament Edition
No Gods. No Capcha. Only Wank.
Please mark any spoilers clearly and try not to spoil stuff that hasn't even aired yet for people.
Keep the rules in mind.
LATEST PAGE | LATEST FLATVIEW PAGE
Game Hate | Canon Hate | Namedropping | Mods' Pet Peeves | Game Pet Peeves | Plurk Pet Peeves | Meme Pet Peeves
Report stupid shit here.
(frozen comment) Re: da
(Anonymous) 2023-03-17 03:30 am (UTC)(link)no one is digging for this dirt, anon. the player is more than happy to spray it herself, her entire plurk is a trashfire of shit like this. you can say 'none of this is rp-related!' but when this lady looks to the rp community to crowdfund her move to the tune of thousands of dollars, it becomes rp related. which is unfortunate for those of us whose scroll wheels are just about broke from scrolling past pages and pages of The Discourse
(frozen comment) Re: da
(Anonymous) 2023-03-17 03:35 am (UTC)(link)(frozen comment) Re: da
(Anonymous) 2023-03-17 03:54 am (UTC)(link)this woman joined her rp and personal lives of her own free will when she decided to link the two by panhandling. now, i don't know how you spend your money, maybe you throw it at every person with a sob story who crosses your path, but when someone asks me for money i want to know why. that's my right as a person whose money is being requested. the woman in question had every opportunity to clean up her plurk, private all the embarrassing shit, whatever, but she didn't do any of that. so i refuse to be shamed for doing my due diligence into a potential investment of my money, and i refuse to feel bad for denying my money to a person who has enough red flags on their plurk to line a soviet parade
ps, the whole "you looked into this person's background! that makes you overinvested!" thing worked the first time you tried it. but as you continue to use it on anyone who doesn't just mindlessly throw their money at this idiot, more and more it starts to look like a criticism-derailing tactic ala gsai
(frozen comment) Re: da
(Anonymous) 2023-03-17 03:55 am (UTC)(link)so. clearly you did a bit more than that.
(frozen comment) Re: da
(Anonymous) 2023-03-17 04:01 am (UTC)(link)i didn't save the plurk link and i'm not about to put myself through the hell of wading through that trashfire a second time just to fetch it for you. believe it or don't, i don't actually care
(frozen comment) i'm da the real da all the other das are just
(Anonymous) 2023-03-17 04:21 am (UTC)(link)no one here even remotely shamed anyone for not donating to her. we all agree it's a bad idea and that she's asking for too much from internet strangers. no one gives a shit that you chose to tab out of the gfm, you drama queen. everyone else did the same thing.
>i refuse to be shamed for doing my due diligence into a potential investment of my money
what's her father got to do with this?
oh wait, nothing.
look, i think this woman is ludicrous and this wank belongs here, but bringing up unrelated shit like parents and kids is a) irrelevant, and more importantly, b) fucking gross. don't be like this.
(frozen comment) nayrt
(Anonymous) 2023-03-17 04:00 am (UTC)(link)the family stuff though, could not give two shits about that
(frozen comment) Re: nayrt
(Anonymous) 2023-03-17 06:48 am (UTC)(link)"lmao"
(frozen comment) Re: nayrt
(Anonymous) 2023-03-17 06:01 pm (UTC)(link)it's only a cool $120 per plurk peep then B) very manageable
(frozen comment) Re: da
(Anonymous) 2023-03-17 04:31 am (UTC)(link)(frozen comment) Re: da
(Anonymous) 2023-03-17 12:16 pm (UTC)(link)gonna need you to more explicitly tie "idiot asks for money in place nobody knew about unless they were already on her friends list" to "it's fair game dragging out the details of her relationship with her children and personal finances to a large audience who has never heard of this person before and who have already told you they don't want to hear about it."
(frozen comment) Re: da
(Anonymous) 2023-03-17 07:26 pm (UTC)(link)(frozen comment) Re: da
(Anonymous) 2023-03-17 07:32 pm (UTC)(link)All of this could be solved by having a friends-only timeline
But limiting her pleas to friends would also limit the pool of potential donors.
That's what makes it a scam.
(frozen comment) Re: da
(Anonymous) 2023-03-17 07:38 pm (UTC)(link)NOT OK: people replurking an ebeggar, forcing you to see things you have no use for. you could solve this by telling the replurkers not to replurk that shit, blocking the plurks, or otherwise controlling your own experience, but that is not okay. because an ebeggar exists, you are justified in hauling someone's entire personal life into the view of other people who have specifically asked you not to because they don't want to see it.
OK: fetishists posting 1000x niche specialty memes to bakerstreet even though they could just look for PSLs, because if they just looked for PSLs, it would limit the pool of potential players. you must control your own experience. no exceptions. also if you complain about this you will be publicly dragged.
(frozen comment) Re: da
(Anonymous) 2023-03-17 08:09 pm (UTC)(link)