Re: da

(Anonymous) 2023-04-28 09:30 pm (UTC)(link)
could that be because not enough people care

(Anonymous) 2023-04-28 09:42 pm (UTC)(link)
"nobody cares about this nobody" -> "post deets" -> "nobody cares about deets" -> "post on plurk" -> "nobody cares about plurk"

(Anonymous) 2023-04-29 02:17 am (UTC)(link)
i don't respond to comments that deliberately misread mine

(Anonymous) 2023-04-29 03:03 am (UTC)(link)
i don't respond to comments at all

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2023-04-28 09:49 pm (UTC)(link)
nobody cared about g? really?

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2023-04-29 12:22 am (UTC)(link)
The plurk got no traction which was a bummer.

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2023-04-29 01:17 am (UTC)(link)
people were 100% willing to ignore all of gonsai's terrible behavior up until the exact moment they stopped having fun

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2023-04-29 04:17 am (UTC)(link)
People knew and were uncomfortable about it. There were numerous quiet conversations about it between players. They also did not want to throw their names on an incendiary Plurk that wankgate was watching like a hawk in order to scrutinize anyone who interacted with it.

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2023-04-29 02:20 am (UTC)(link)
no one had the balls to share the plurk about g because g has a history of attacking the people who malign him

furthermore: not very many people cared enough about g until they stopped having fun at jgkc. until that point it was more wankgate rumormill bullshit, as no one had the balls to etc etc

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2023-04-29 03:48 am (UTC)(link)
isn’t the stuff that this person is being accused of basically the same thing? that they attack people for what they perceive as transgressions against them?

idk if they’re still doing the same shit or whatever but accusing people of not having the balls to do something really does not inspire confidence in people actually coming out with the deets that you keep crying at them for

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2023-04-30 12:59 pm (UTC)(link)
i don't know because i'm not that anon and I don't actually care about this wank, i just think it's stupid to bawww impotently about it

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2023-04-30 01:22 pm (UTC)(link)
this comment doesn’t make sense in the context of this thread

i’m just gonna assume you want people to waste peoples brain cells aka a troll

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2023-04-30 01:39 pm (UTC)(link)
okay

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2023-04-30 02:09 pm (UTC)(link)
you are in the impotent bawwing community, impotently bawwing at the impotent bawwers. i am impotently bawwing at you. in a way we are siblings, you and i, except your brain is a perfectly smooth 3cm-diameter acrylic sphere.

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2023-04-30 02:21 pm (UTC)(link)
you're stupid!

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2023-04-30 02:23 pm (UTC)(link)
we are twins.

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2023-04-30 02:24 pm (UTC)(link)
make a plurk about it

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2023-04-30 02:30 pm (UTC)(link)
https://www.plurk.com/p/p8q1j5

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2023-04-30 03:13 pm (UTC)(link)
jokes on you numbnuts i didn't copy and paste this url, i highlighted it then right-clicked "open link in new tab"

HA

this is my perfect victory

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2023-05-01 02:02 am (UTC)(link)
Nice plurk background.