Re: sa

(Anonymous) 2023-05-01 04:10 am (UTC)(link)
iirc people tried to reach out to the victim and the victim's family, but whatever. this community ostracization happened with wankgate. your position looks like "but that doesn't count because i can imagine a perfect world where everything happened better and without wg."

i can imagine a world where i have tits on my ass so that every time i sit down, my nipples hurt. and it's just as relevant as whatever your deal is.

Re: sa

(Anonymous) 2023-05-01 04:12 am (UTC)(link)
you want wankgate to be more than a terminally online internet barbie burn book so bad it makes you look stupid

Re: sa

(Anonymous) 2023-05-01 04:15 am (UTC)(link)
buddy, i don't just look stupid, i am stupid. i'm so stupid i just spent several posts trying to seriously discuss something on wankgate. you did the same thing. you have done all of the same things you are complaining are so worthless and without merit.

whatever the reason is that compels you to be here, that's the worth of wankgate. the burn book/subway vigilante angle is just drag.

Re: sa

(Anonymous) 2023-05-01 04:16 am (UTC)(link)
lol

+1

(Anonymous) 2023-05-01 06:11 am (UTC)(link)
itt wgers are extremely pressed

da

(Anonymous) 2023-05-01 04:14 am (UTC)(link)
This argument is pointless though because when anons said "wg is irrelevant" they mean in 2023, not "wankgate was irrelevant for all time". Being relevant years ago doesn't mean you're relevant now, that's the opposite of how relevancy works.

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2023-05-01 04:17 am (UTC)(link)
there has been at least one major, recent, highly visible wank that this community supercharged without a shadow of a doubt, with direct beneficial effects on affected dwrp players. interesting that it doesn't seem to register with either of the 2? 3? clout-demanding anons.

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2023-05-01 04:18 am (UTC)(link)
wow

one whole wank

let's not spend it all in one place guys

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2023-05-01 04:23 am (UTC)(link)
I'm the original anon who said that most of the actually disastrous JGK threads were logged in or on rpanons (the wankgate threads in comparison were just popcorning the former), and I still believe that, so I'm just going to dip since this is clearly an ouroboros of conversation

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2023-05-01 04:57 am (UTC)(link)
this same argument goes for dwrp itself tho, so there really isn't any point to it

either you're invested in a dying adjunct community of a dying hobby (in which case you probably oughta dip and find a hobby where the relevance you seek can be attained), or you're not invested in those but are still wasting your time and energy arguing about how totally not relevant they are. p. sad way to spend an evening either way imo