not in this fandom (in comics) and nayrt but this is basically a huge thing. it's not even being a proxy it's just skeevy for other reasons and both sharon and peggy are kind of... boring...
i'm on the het side of comic fandom though so i can't tell you what excuses the stucky and stony people give.
where the fuck is all the steve/diana already, that was all i wanted from that superman batman shitshow!
a. steve should still have some trust issues over what she was up to in caws. b. she's related to peggy. beyond that, captain america is, essetially, someone sharon "grew up" hearing about and probably enjoying the exploits of. there's a squicky area of childhood idolization there that i can't get past. c. peggy's body isn't even cold in the ground yet ffs. d. even disregarding c, if peggy got over steve, we've yet to see steve get over her - and, in fact, him getting over her flies into the face of what was presented as cap's tragic flaw in the movie: his inability to let go of the past (bucky) because there's still a part of him that longs for it and will probably always remember that skinny kid from brooklyn. e. the pacing for the romance was absolute trash. f. emily van camp is possibly the worst actor in the mcu, even below sebstan's grunt acting. g. let's say i bought her acting, though. it still makes no sense that this self-sufficient woman who never told anyone about her famous aunt lest it detract from her own merit would want her aunt's seconds...especially with there even being a hint of doubt that steve would look at her and see, for a split second, peggy.
i felt more invested in wanda and vision's relationship and i'm not even sure if that's supposed to be read as romantic.
jesus fuck, this is the same fandom that soaks their panties over thor/loki incest. even if you don't personally like the ship, a guy who essentially time traveled forward three quarters of a century hooking up with a woman who's related (several steps removed) to the woman he had a crush on but never actually even dated should not be considered "absolutely disgusting".
From the point of view of a movie-goer and not a comic book reader: it felt like it came almost out of nowhere. CW was good, but with so much packed into it, it obviously had some pacing issues, especially where Sharon/Steve was involved. Other than that, it's weird she's related to Peggy, but I would never go so far as to call it "disgusting".
CA:CW SPOILERS
(Anonymous) 2016-05-06 06:52 pm (UTC)(link)sharon carter/steve rogers
absolutely disgusting in every way
Re: CA:CW SPOILERS
(Anonymous) 2016-05-06 07:13 pm (UTC)(link)Re: CA:CW SPOILERS
(Anonymous) 2016-05-06 11:28 pm (UTC)(link)Re: CA:CW SPOILERS
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 03:38 (UTC) - ExpandRe: CA:CW SPOILERS
(Anonymous) 2016-05-06 07:17 pm (UTC)(link)Re: CA:CW SPOILERS
(Anonymous) 2016-05-06 07:24 pm (UTC)(link)i'm on the het side of comic fandom though so i can't tell you what excuses the stucky and stony people give.
where the fuck is all the steve/diana already, that was all i wanted from that superman batman shitshow!
da
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-06 20:25 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-06 21:24 (UTC) - Expandayrt
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-06 23:41 (UTC) - Expanddda
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-11 03:30 (UTC) - ExpandRe: CA:CW SPOILERS
(Anonymous) 2016-05-06 11:40 pm (UTC)(link)b. she's related to peggy. beyond that, captain america is, essetially, someone sharon "grew up" hearing about and probably enjoying the exploits of. there's a squicky area of childhood idolization there that i can't get past.
c. peggy's body isn't even cold in the ground yet ffs.
d. even disregarding c, if peggy got over steve, we've yet to see steve get over her - and, in fact, him getting over her flies into the face of what was presented as cap's tragic flaw in the movie: his inability to let go of the past (bucky) because there's still a part of him that longs for it and will probably always remember that skinny kid from brooklyn.
e. the pacing for the romance was absolute trash.
f. emily van camp is possibly the worst actor in the mcu, even below sebstan's grunt acting.
g. let's say i bought her acting, though. it still makes no sense that this self-sufficient woman who never told anyone about her famous aunt lest it detract from her own merit would want her aunt's seconds...especially with there even being a hint of doubt that steve would look at her and see, for a split second, peggy.
i felt more invested in wanda and vision's relationship and i'm not even sure if that's supposed to be read as romantic.
Re: CA:CW SPOILERS
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 00:03 (UTC) - ExpandRe: CA:CW SPOILERS
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 00:10 (UTC) - ExpandRe: CA:CW SPOILERS
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 00:22 (UTC) - ExpandRe: CA:CW SPOILERS
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 00:47 (UTC) - ExpandRe: CA:CW SPOILERS
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 00:56 (UTC) - ExpandRe: CA:CW SPOILERS
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 00:58 (UTC) - ExpandRe: CA:CW SPOILERS
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 00:59 (UTC) - ExpandRe: CA:CW SPOILERS
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 05:45 (UTC) - ExpandRe: CA:CW SPOILERS
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 06:13 (UTC) - ExpandRe: CA:CW SPOILERS
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 06:27 (UTC) - ExpandRe: CA:CW SPOILERS
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 14:11 (UTC) - ExpandRe: CA:CW SPOILERS
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 14:30 (UTC) - ExpandRe: CA:CW SPOILERS
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 14:38 (UTC) - ExpandRe: CA:CW SPOILERS
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 01:00 (UTC) - ExpandRe: CA:CW SPOILERS
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 01:01 (UTC) - ExpandRe: CA:CW SPOILERS
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 01:06 (UTC) - ExpandRe: CA:CW SPOILERS
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 01:14 (UTC) - Expandda
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 04:42 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 06:17 (UTC) - Expandda
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 14:02 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 14:11 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 14:17 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 14:37 (UTC) - ExpandRe: CA:CW SPOILERS
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-13 15:51 (UTC) - ExpandRe: CA:CW SPOILERS
Re: CA:CW SPOILERS
(Anonymous) 2016-05-06 07:41 pm (UTC)(link)Most caps wont ship with you most likely. Cause most cap players I know find it skeevy (and 2 of them I know are het shippers).
so Smear her everywhere and get no where with Cap players.
Re: CA:CW SPOILERS
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-06 20:53 (UTC) - ExpandRe: CA:CW SPOILERS
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-06 21:06 (UTC) - ExpandRe: CA:CW SPOILERS
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 00:17 (UTC) - ExpandRe: CA:CW SPOILERS
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 00:34 (UTC) - ExpandRe: CA:CW SPOILERS
(Anonymous) 2016-05-06 09:11 pm (UTC)(link)and for the record i ship steve/duty, not butthurt over other ships
Re: CA:CW SPOILERS
(Anonymous) 2016-05-07 03:46 am (UTC)(link)Re: CA:CW SPOILERS
(Anonymous) 2016-05-09 04:10 am (UTC)(link)yes it's canon
Re: CA:CW SPOILERS
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-09 16:15 (UTC) - ExpandRe: CA:CW SPOILERS
(Anonymous) 2016-05-06 10:42 pm (UTC)(link)does one of them rape the other? beat them? psychologically abuse them? is she underage?
what about the movie took it from being a bit a bit weird over the line into "absolutely disgusting in every way"?
Re: CA:CW SPOILERS
(Anonymous) 2016-05-06 11:27 pm (UTC)(link)Re: CA:CW SPOILERS
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 00:20 (UTC) - ExpandRe: CA:CW SPOILERS
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-10 00:54 (UTC) - ExpandRe: CA:CW SPOILERS
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-10 01:01 (UTC) - ExpandRe: CA:CW SPOILERS
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-10 02:12 (UTC) - ExpandRe: CA:CW SPOILERS
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-13 16:09 (UTC) - ExpandRe: CA:CW SPOILERS
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-13 17:29 (UTC) - ExpandRe: CA:CW SPOILERS
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-13 16:10 (UTC) - ExpandRe: CA:CW SPOILERS
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-10 01:02 (UTC) - Expandda
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-10 02:17 (UTC) - Expand+ 9999
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-10 02:23 (UTC) - ExpandRe: + 9999
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-11 00:08 (UTC) - ExpandRe: CA:CW SPOILERS
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 03:45 (UTC) - Expand+1000
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 06:16 (UTC) - Expand+1
(Anonymous) 2016-05-07 01:17 am (UTC)(link)Re: +1
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 01:40 (UTC) - ExpandRe: +1
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 01:50 (UTC) - ExpandRe: +1
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 02:10 (UTC) - Expandda
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 02:12 (UTC) - ExpandRe: +1
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 02:13 (UTC) - ExpandRe: +1
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 02:17 (UTC) - Expandda
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 02:21 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 02:29 (UTC) - Expandsa
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 02:32 (UTC) - ExpandRe: sa
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 02:38 (UTC) - ExpandRe: sa
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 02:46 (UTC) - ExpandRe: sa
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 02:52 (UTC) - ExpandRe: sa
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 02:55 (UTC) - ExpandRe: sa
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 02:57 (UTC) - ExpandRe: sa
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 02:59 (UTC) - ExpandRe: sa
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 03:03 (UTC) - ExpandRe: sa
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 03:04 (UTC) - ExpandRe: sa
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 03:44 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 05:35 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 14:08 (UTC) - Expandda
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 15:22 (UTC) - Expand(frozen comment) Re: da
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 15:27 (UTC) - Expand(frozen comment) Re: da
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 15:28 (UTC) - Expand(frozen comment) Re: da
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 15:32 (UTC) - Expand(frozen comment) Re: da
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 15:32 (UTC) - Expand(frozen comment) Re: da
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 15:36 (UTC) - Expand(frozen comment) Re: da
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 15:37 (UTC) - Expand(frozen comment) Re: da
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 15:38 (UTC) - Expand(frozen comment) Re: da
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 15:38 (UTC) - Expand(frozen comment) Re: da
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 15:38 (UTC) - Expand(frozen comment) Re: da
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 15:40 (UTC) - Expand(frozen comment) Re: da
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 15:41 (UTC) - Expand(frozen comment) Re: da
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 15:43 (UTC) - Expand(frozen comment) Re: da
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 15:45 (UTC) - Expand(frozen comment) Re: da
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 15:47 (UTC) - Expand(frozen comment) Re: da
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 15:48 (UTC) - Expand(frozen comment) Re: da
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 15:31 (UTC) - Expand(frozen comment) Re: da
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 15:33 (UTC) - Expand(frozen comment) Re: da
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 15:37 (UTC) - Expand(frozen comment) Re: da
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 15:33 (UTC) - Expand(frozen comment) Re: da
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 15:35 (UTC) - Expand(frozen comment) Re: da
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 15:37 (UTC) - Expand(frozen comment) Re: da
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 15:38 (UTC) - Expand(frozen comment) Re: da
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 15:39 (UTC) - Expand(frozen comment) Re: da
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 15:39 (UTC) - Expand(frozen comment) Re: da
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 15:40 (UTC) - Expand(frozen comment) Re: da
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 15:41 (UTC) - Expand(frozen comment) Re: da
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 15:43 (UTC) - Expand(frozen comment) Re: da
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 15:40 (UTC) - Expand(frozen comment) Re: da
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 15:42 (UTC) - Expand(frozen comment) Re: da
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 15:44 (UTC) - Expand(frozen comment) Re: da
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 15:45 (UTC) - Expand(frozen comment) Re: da
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 15:46 (UTC) - Expand(frozen comment) da
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 15:47 (UTC) - Expand(frozen comment) Re: da
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 15:49 (UTC) - Expand(frozen comment) Re: da
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 15:58 (UTC) - Expand(frozen comment) Re: da
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 16:02 (UTC) - Expand(frozen comment) Re: da
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 16:25 (UTC) - Expand(frozen comment) Re: da
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 19:55 (UTC) - ExpandRe: +1
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-13 21:28 (UTC) - ExpandRe: +1
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-14 06:32 (UTC) - ExpandRe: +1
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 02:15 (UTC) - ExpandRe: +1
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 04:58 (UTC) - ExpandRe: +1
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 06:23 (UTC) - ExpandRe: +1
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 02:21 (UTC) - ExpandRe: +1
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 02:30 (UTC) - ExpandRe: +1
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 02:48 (UTC) - ExpandRe: +1
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 04:01 (UTC) - Expandayrt
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 02:51 (UTC) - ExpandRe: +1
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 02:40 (UTC) - ExpandRe: +1
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 02:45 (UTC) - Expandda
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 02:48 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 03:02 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 03:03 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 03:04 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 03:31 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 03:36 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 03:39 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 12:08 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-08 15:28 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-08 15:34 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-09 04:22 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-09 19:10 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-09 19:13 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-09 19:28 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-09 19:31 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-09 20:10 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-09 19:53 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-09 20:10 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-10 07:29 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-10 08:59 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-10 14:50 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-10 16:03 (UTC) - Expandsa
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-10 16:05 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-11 00:17 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-11 02:08 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-11 02:15 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-11 02:42 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-11 19:54 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-11 05:21 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-11 06:03 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-11 08:07 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-11 10:24 (UTC) - Expand...
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-11 12:09 (UTC) - Expand...
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-11 12:19 (UTC) - Expand...
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-11 12:41 (UTC) - Expand...
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-11 19:12 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-09 23:53 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 03:07 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 05:58 (UTC) - ExpandRe: +1
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 02:50 (UTC) - ExpandRe: +1
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 06:11 (UTC) - Expandda
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 19:02 (UTC) - Expandddda +1
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 19:29 (UTC) - ExpandRe: CA:CW SPOILERS
(Anonymous) 2016-05-06 11:12 pm (UTC)(link)Re: CA:CW SPOILERS
(Anonymous) 2016-05-07 02:52 am (UTC)(link)Re: CA:CW SPOILERS
(Anonymous) 2016-05-07 02:54 am (UTC)(link)like very loud, very audible ews that were from adults
Re: CA:CW SPOILERS
(Anonymous) 2016-05-07 06:12 am (UTC)(link)Re: CA:CW SPOILERS
(Anonymous) 2016-05-07 11:57 am (UTC)(link)ITT: SHARON STANS
Re: ITT: SHARON STANS
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 14:28 (UTC) - ExpandRe: ITT: SHARON STANS
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 14:34 (UTC) - ExpandRe: ITT: SHARON STANS
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 14:43 (UTC) - ExpandRe: ITT: SHARON STANS
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 14:46 (UTC) - ExpandRe: ITT: SHARON STANS
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 14:48 (UTC) - ExpandRe: ITT: SHARON STANS
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 14:50 (UTC) - ExpandRe: ITT: SHARON STANS
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 14:56 (UTC) - ExpandRe: ITT: SHARON STANS
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 15:02 (UTC) - ExpandRe: ITT: SHARON STANS
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 15:06 (UTC) - ExpandRe: ITT: SHARON STANS
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 15:08 (UTC) - ExpandRe: ITT: SHARON STANS
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 15:12 (UTC) - ExpandRe: ITT: SHARON STANS
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 15:11 (UTC) - ExpandRe: ITT: SHARON STANS
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 15:15 (UTC) - ExpandRe: ITT: SHARON STANS
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 15:18 (UTC) - ExpandRe: ITT: SHARON STANS
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 14:49 (UTC) - ExpandRe: ITT: SHARON STANS
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 14:54 (UTC) - ExpandRe: ITT: SHARON STANS
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 14:59 (UTC) - ExpandRe: ITT: SHARON STANS
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 15:00 (UTC) - ExpandRe: ITT: SHARON STANS
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 17:40 (UTC) - ExpandRe: ITT: SHARON STANS
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 18:41 (UTC) - ExpandRe: ITT: SHARON STANS
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 19:30 (UTC) - ExpandRe: ITT: SHARON STANS
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 19:59 (UTC) - ExpandRe: ITT: SHARON STANS
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-08 01:32 (UTC) - ExpandRe: ITT: SHARON STANS
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 19:53 (UTC) - ExpandRe: CA:CW SPOILERS
(Anonymous) 2016-05-07 02:59 am (UTC)(link)Re: CA:CW SPOILERS
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 03:02 (UTC) - ExpandRe: CA:CW SPOILERS
y'all need your diapers changed
Re: CA:CW SPOILERS
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 15:09 (UTC) - ExpandRe: CA:CW SPOILERS
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 15:20 (UTC) - ExpandRe: CA:CW SPOILERS
(Anonymous) 2016-05-07 06:40 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 20:35 (UTC) - ExpandRe: CA:CW SPOILERS
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 20:45 (UTC) - ExpandRe: CA:CW SPOILERS
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 20:47 (UTC) - ExpandRe: CA:CW SPOILERS
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-09 06:46 (UTC) - ExpandRe: CA:CW SPOILERS
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-09 11:35 (UTC) - ExpandRe: CA:CW SPOILERS
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-09 15:45 (UTC) - ExpandRe: CA:CW SPOILERS
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-09 15:55 (UTC) - ExpandRe: CA:CW SPOILERS
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-09 16:22 (UTC) - ExpandRe: CA:CW SPOILERS
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-09 16:24 (UTC) - ExpandRe: CA:CW SPOILERS
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-09 16:27 (UTC) - ExpandRe: CA:CW SPOILERS
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-09 16:20 (UTC) - ExpandRe: CA:CW SPOILERS
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-09 21:40 (UTC) - Expandthread op
(Anonymous) 2016-05-07 11:22 pm (UTC)(link)this thread was 100% in earnest and so were my arguments.
Re: thread op
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 23:33 (UTC) - ExpandRe: thread op
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-09 06:44 (UTC) - ExpandRe: CA:CW SPOILERS
(Anonymous) 2016-05-14 02:19 pm (UTC)(link)Re: CA:CW SPOILERS
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-14 23:50 (UTC) - ExpandRe: CA:CW SPOILERS
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-14 23:57 (UTC) - Expand