(frozen comment) Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-03-16 08:01 pm (UTC)(link)
not asking for a link in case this is locked, but any chance you are comfortable disclosing the plurk name of the begger?

i'd like to treat myself to a rare kindness and block in advance.

(frozen comment) Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-03-16 08:06 pm (UTC)(link)
it's public.

"errantwritings" for your block purposes.

(frozen comment) Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-03-16 08:24 pm (UTC)(link)
your grudgewanking namedrop was locked, janice

go do your tags

(frozen comment) Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-03-16 09:17 pm (UTC)(link)
lol

(frozen comment) Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-03-17 02:52 am (UTC)(link)
absolutely no one cares about this pathetic woman enough to 'grudgewank' on her, but even if someone did they'd just have to give up out the gate because there's nothing anyone here can do to her that's worse than what she's doing to herself

bored anons: shitpost on her plurk, dig up her old wank, make fun of her for wasting money boozing while being -$6500+ in debt
cat herself: commits to moving across the country in the absolute most expensive way possible, torches her relationship with her landlords, torches her relationship with her father, lets everything she owned get seized by the movers she herself hired without having the money to pay for because she expected strangers on the internet to foot the bill

it's not even a contest. grudgewankers go home, this lady's pouring gas on the raging tire fire of her life better than any of you ever will

(frozen comment) da

(Anonymous) 2023-03-17 03:16 am (UTC)(link)
the locked thread was definitely some crusty, gross grudgewank posted by someone who cares unhealthily much about this person. especially bringing up her family. there's rubbernecking at a trainwreck and then there's whatever the fuck that was

(frozen comment) Re: da

(Anonymous) 2023-03-17 03:18 am (UTC)(link)
lbr ayrt also knows an unhealthy amount about this person

(frozen comment) Re: da

(Anonymous) 2023-03-17 03:26 am (UTC)(link)
wym i definitely know about the familial relationships of every person in my life whom i !!!!don't!!!! care about

(frozen comment) Re: da

(Anonymous) 2023-03-17 03:30 am (UTC)(link)
ayrt you are referring to and literally everything i know from this person comes from two minutes of scrolling through her plurk after seeing flatview flooded for days with posts about her

no one is digging for this dirt, anon. the player is more than happy to spray it herself, her entire plurk is a trashfire of shit like this. you can say 'none of this is rp-related!' but when this lady looks to the rp community to crowdfund her move to the tune of thousands of dollars, it becomes rp related. which is unfortunate for those of us whose scroll wheels are just about broke from scrolling past pages and pages of The Discourse

(frozen comment) Re: da

(Anonymous) 2023-03-17 03:35 am (UTC)(link)
ok but a biiiiiiig chunk of the "rp community" already told you they dont want to get involved with this woman's finances and think this is all way too personal, and here we are, still going through her receipts, because thats what YOU want.

(frozen comment) Re: da

(Anonymous) 2023-03-17 03:54 am (UTC)(link)
good to know i'm speaking with the self-appointed voice of the rp community, eh? oh, wait, i'm not

this woman joined her rp and personal lives of her own free will when she decided to link the two by panhandling. now, i don't know how you spend your money, maybe you throw it at every person with a sob story who crosses your path, but when someone asks me for money i want to know why. that's my right as a person whose money is being requested. the woman in question had every opportunity to clean up her plurk, private all the embarrassing shit, whatever, but she didn't do any of that. so i refuse to be shamed for doing my due diligence into a potential investment of my money, and i refuse to feel bad for denying my money to a person who has enough red flags on their plurk to line a soviet parade

ps, the whole "you looked into this person's background! that makes you overinvested!" thing worked the first time you tried it. but as you continue to use it on anyone who doesn't just mindlessly throw their money at this idiot, more and more it starts to look like a criticism-derailing tactic ala gsai

(frozen comment) Re: da

(Anonymous) 2023-03-17 03:55 am (UTC)(link)
just fyi anon i scrolled through her timeline real quick and i didn't see anything about conflict with her father

so. clearly you did a bit more than that.

(frozen comment) Re: da

(Anonymous) 2023-03-17 04:01 am (UTC)(link)
that or she privated it in what would the first intelligent decision she's made in this whole shitshow

i didn't save the plurk link and i'm not about to put myself through the hell of wading through that trashfire a second time just to fetch it for you. believe it or don't, i don't actually care

(frozen comment) i'm da the real da all the other das are just

(Anonymous) 2023-03-17 04:21 am (UTC)(link)
>i refuse to feel bad for denying my money to a person who has enough red flags on their plurk to line a soviet parade

no one here even remotely shamed anyone for not donating to her. we all agree it's a bad idea and that she's asking for too much from internet strangers. no one gives a shit that you chose to tab out of the gfm, you drama queen. everyone else did the same thing.

>i refuse to be shamed for doing my due diligence into a potential investment of my money

what's her father got to do with this?

oh wait, nothing.

look, i think this woman is ludicrous and this wank belongs here, but bringing up unrelated shit like parents and kids is a) irrelevant, and more importantly, b) fucking gross. don't be like this.

(frozen comment) nayrt

(Anonymous) 2023-03-17 04:00 am (UTC)(link)
if she's going to panhandle among rpers (notoriously a poor and cash-strapped bunch) to the point where she expects her fifty-odd plurk friends to fork over 6 grand for her with no receipts or invoices? (so that's what, $300+ a person? lmao) then yeah, wg is going to point and laugh. this whole thread has been people pointing and laughing

the family stuff though, could not give two shits about that

(frozen comment) Re: nayrt

(Anonymous) 2023-03-17 06:48 am (UTC)(link)
300 x 50 = 15,000

"lmao"

(frozen comment) Re: nayrt

(Anonymous) 2023-03-17 06:01 pm (UTC)(link)
oh shit you're right. should've known better than to do math late at night

it's only a cool $120 per plurk peep then B) very manageable

(frozen comment) Re: da

(Anonymous) 2023-03-17 04:31 am (UTC)(link)
if someone is asking for a very large amount of money, people are going to want to know who they are and why they need that money before just forking some over. of course people are going to look at their completely public and open social media to get an idea of that, which means they're going to see whatever is posted there. it's hardly "going through her receipts" when all of the receipts are sitting out there right in the open on the kitchen table for the entire world to see.

(frozen comment) Re: da

(Anonymous) 2023-03-17 12:16 pm (UTC)(link)
...............everyone has already blown off this person's big ask. find me the imperiled souls who are handing over their life's savings to her. show me on the doll where the horrible community suffering is happening.

gonna need you to more explicitly tie "idiot asks for money in place nobody knew about unless they were already on her friends list" to "it's fair game dragging out the details of her relationship with her children and personal finances to a large audience who has never heard of this person before and who have already told you they don't want to hear about it."

(frozen comment) Re: da

(Anonymous) 2023-03-17 07:26 pm (UTC)(link)
anon her begging plurks have been replurked by multiple people, they've ended up on my timeline and i don't know this person from adam so your claim of "idiot asks for money in place nobody knew about unless they were already on her friends list" is patently false

(frozen comment) Re: da

(Anonymous) 2023-03-17 07:32 pm (UTC)(link)
+1

All of this could be solved by having a friends-only timeline
But limiting her pleas to friends would also limit the pool of potential donors.

That's what makes it a scam.

(frozen comment) Re: da

(Anonymous) 2023-03-17 07:38 pm (UTC)(link)
the wankgate fatties council issues the following interim opinion: 2023-EBEG-WHNRS-PENIS-0317

NOT OK: people replurking an ebeggar, forcing you to see things you have no use for. you could solve this by telling the replurkers not to replurk that shit, blocking the plurks, or otherwise controlling your own experience, but that is not okay. because an ebeggar exists, you are justified in hauling someone's entire personal life into the view of other people who have specifically asked you not to because they don't want to see it.

OK: fetishists posting 1000x niche specialty memes to bakerstreet even though they could just look for PSLs, because if they just looked for PSLs, it would limit the pool of potential players. you must control your own experience. no exceptions. also if you complain about this you will be publicly dragged.

(frozen comment) Re: da

(Anonymous) 2023-03-17 08:09 pm (UTC)(link)
the wankgate fatties council issues the following interim opinion: i ran a train on ur mom last night lmao

(frozen comment) Re: da

(Anonymous) 2023-03-17 07:16 am (UTC)(link)
lmaaaooo huge amount of ugly defensiveness in this thread. good work, wankgate

(frozen comment) Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-03-16 10:34 pm (UTC)(link)
MORE THREADS, SNIVELY!