Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-04-13 01:42 pm (UTC)(link)
the ny post and fox news are often viewed as clickbait as well. hoping i can divert the surprise for you if someone says it elsewhere

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-04-13 01:45 pm (UTC)(link)
i knew you guys hate fox cause of the deep republican roots, but i thought wsj and nytimes were widely regarded as your more serious paper

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-04-13 01:50 pm (UTC)(link)
The New York Times publishes anti-Black and antisemitic editorials on the regular.

It’s not a viable news source anymore.

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-04-13 01:51 pm (UTC)(link)
major media entities are all bought and paid for by people we hate

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-04-13 01:52 pm (UTC)(link)
"you guys" being americans?

wsj was serious at one point (and other anon is correct that they still do real journalism, as does nyt), but both papers you named have gone downhill, wsj because it's owned by rupert murdoch and nyt because they wanted more money

unless you mixed up nyt and ny post in which case: the ny post has always been a tabloid pretending to be news

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-04-13 02:11 pm (UTC)(link)
I can’t be the only one still shocked that Rupert Murdoch is still alive. Evil never dies, huh?

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-04-13 02:13 pm (UTC)(link)
kissinger is still alive so this tracks.

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2023-04-13 02:22 pm (UTC)(link)
yes, sorry, americans. i see what you mean, we don't get your ny post here, but we do the nyt. i thought the post and nytimes maybe were the same thing and there was an anon typo.

anyway, parthas mod's meltdown has been an interestimg learning experience for me, thanks for the insight!