251: back in my day wank meant something

[ryanongosling]

Please mark any spoilers clearly and try not to spoil stuff that hasn't even aired yet for people.

Keep the rules in mind.

LATEST PAGE | LATEST FLATVIEW PAGE

Game Hate | Canon Hate | Namedropping | Mods' Pet Peeves | Game Pet Peeves | Plurk Pet Peeves | Meme Pet Peeves

Report stupid shit here.

Comments

Re: BAKERSTREET

[(Anonymous)]

https://rpanons.dreamwidth.org/95911.html?thread=278282151#cmt278282151

is it wankfishing if i ask for bets on who this hilariously defensive tav might be

Re: BAKERSTREET

[(Anonymous)]

yes and it's also pathetic to come here because you're losing an argument

Re: BAKERSTREET

[(Anonymous)]

oh hi

i'm not the mha person i've just been popcorning the bizarre butt devastation going on in that thread, thanks for the entertainment

da

[(Anonymous)]

The "I'm totally not mad I'm just an uninvolved observer linking this thread on wg for no reason teehee" defense has never been a good or believable look

Re: da

[(Anonymous)]

famously, a very good look is arguing for 200 comments about whether tfln is good or bad. this is very hinged. it's also important to make sure everyone knows your malleable protag does get smut threads, actually!! they get all kinds of great threads!! no one would ever not want to tag them!!

Re: da

[(Anonymous)]

you don't seem very hinged yourself just as an fyi

Re: da

[(Anonymous)]

at least do a your mom joke, jesus christ

Re: da

[(Anonymous)]

y'all really here typing like this? just. get off your phones for 2 hours. please

Re: da

[(Anonymous)]

everyone knows that tfln is for horny sluts and if someone so much as mentions sex in a tag with you they are probably a horny slut too

mha anon sounds like one of our resident "gray ace" asexuals who freaks out if they have to acknowledge the concept of fucking

Re: da

[(Anonymous)]

i didn't really read their posts tbh, they were too boring and i don't know why they're bothering to insist tfln is too horny when they could just not post in tfln, problem solved, it's one of like 500 memes

the tav player (? i'm not sure how many people are in that thread) seemed genuinely mad on tfln's behalf though so theirs were the funny posts

Re: da

[(Anonymous)]

it sounds like having read it they're just saying that they've had people start horny threads with them in response to someone who keeps insisting tfln isn't about drunken horny threads.

i regularly post to tfln. it is 80% horny shit. that isn't a good or bad thing, its just a fact. i'm very curious about this tav player and their insistence that most of tfln isn't horny stuff?

Re: da

[(Anonymous)]

that player is always on rpa being super aggro, so idk if it has to do with tfln in particular. they have a distinctive writing style and are incredibly hostile and condescending in all of their comments.

Re: da

[(Anonymous)]

some people get really defensive of memes on bakerstreet especially the popular ones. i once mentioned in a disco group that tfln was a low effort way to unwind since it was fast and not serious and a friend of mine got incredibly offended by it. idk maybe some people are putting in a ton of effort for it but 98% of the people i know treat it as a time waster that at best may introduce you to some new people and at worst will give you some awkward threads

Re: BAKERSTREET

[(Anonymous)]

who are you thanking? Im not in that thread

go do your tags instead of wankfishing on some random rpa anon

Re: BAKERSTREET

[(Anonymous)]

not getting the reaction you wanted, huh

bummer

Re: BAKERSTREET

[(Anonymous)]

i think you might be the hilariously defensive one, anon

Re: BAKERSTREET

[(Anonymous)]

for once can't we just ignore the idiot and maybe they'll go away?

Re: BAKERSTREET

[(Anonymous)]

that is not what we do here on anoncomms

+1

[(Anonymous)]

this is the group of people who can't even let someone say something as mundane as "I'm sad I haven't been tagged back in a few weeks" go without getting attacked for whatever perceived issue anons have with the generic ass complaint that was made

who are we if half of us don't way overinvest and misread things posted in the rp woes thread. people who post to it are more or less begging to have someone come in and tell them how everything is their fault or to have someone else start a tangential argument that lasts all month spinning off of their comment

[(Anonymous)]

ok fair enough, I'll give you that

Re: BAKERSTREET

[(Anonymous)]

i'm 99% sure i know who it is, but i don't want to say in case it'd be throwing an innocent person to the wolves. if you've interacted with any tavs i don't think it's hard to figure out, though.

Re: BAKERSTREET

[(Anonymous)]

yeah i have a strong hunch too, but i've been accused of being people i'm not on anon, and i've seen people leave comments i could have written. so no reason to ruin some rando's day by guessing when there's every chance it's someone who only acts up on anon or who is lying and actually plays a wol and is just throwing tavs under the bus.

Re: BAKERSTREET

[(Anonymous)]

i've seen a friend turn a tav down and get a response that felt really passagg and "your loss!" and weird, but for all i know there's more than one like that so idk

Re: BAKERSTREET

[(Anonymous)]

as someone who is considering rping as one of the bg3 origin characters and doesn't mind tavs but would really prefer to avoid this one. can i ask are they are very active on bakerstreet and tag out a lot or is this person just a top levels then leaves the meme type.

Re: BAKERSTREET

[(Anonymous)]

if it's the one with a reputation for being rancid when they think you won't tell anyone, they are active and tag back, and afaik are constantly seeking threads. since I don't have any firsthand screen caps or anything though, I'll just say avoid the usual red flags of someone who thinks their oc is the hottest most important thing in the world, and you'll be avoiding the crazies anyway.