dat profile
dat hair
Okay, I must have missed this if it was explained earlier... but what's with the asterisk in trans*? Is there supposed to be a footnote? Or is it now a terrible transphobic thing to abbreviate? I don't follow SJW stuff on tumblr or anything, but I try to keep reasonably abreast of gender studies and this is the first time I've seen it written that way.
Some anon on the other page said something like the asterisk was to denote that it could either be transgender or transsexual... but how does that make any sense? Trans without the asterisk can mean the exact same thing, so if you really want to be specific, type the rest of the word you mean.
Some anon on the other page said something like the asterisk was to denote that it could either be transgender or transsexual... but how does that make any sense? Trans without the asterisk can mean the exact same thing, so if you really want to be specific, type the rest of the word you mean.
It's a wildcard that can stand for transwoman or transman or transgender or transexual. It's basically a catchall that's much faster and easier to type out than a trillion and one terms and offends nobody.
I see this asked all the time and people are super suspicious of it, but it's honestly boring. Sorry if this ruined the suspense.
I see this asked all the time and people are super suspicious of it, but it's honestly boring. Sorry if this ruined the suspense.
AFAIK, it's actually to denote that it includes both transwomen and transmen. Like Latin@ is to denote both Latina and Latino.
it's just some stupid shit cis white tumblr users love using to seem more accepting and inclusive and i don't even know, because like you said, trans by itself is basically the exact same thing and has been used the exact same way for years
it annoys the shit out of me tbh
it annoys the shit out of me tbh
http://houseofcardsooc.livejournal.com/175289.html#comments
(Anonymous) 2013-01-23 02:48 pm (UTC)(link)gotta love those tmi drop posts
Re: http://houseofcardsooc.livejournal.com/175289.html#comments
(Anonymous) 2013-01-23 02:51 pm (UTC)(link)some people are just really thirsty for attention and buttpats
Re: http://houseofcardsooc.livejournal.com/175289.html#comments
(Anonymous) 2013-01-23 05:30 pm (UTC)(link)that does sound kinda fucked but jesus buddy, nobody asked for your life story
give it to friends if they ask but some people just flat-out don't care beyond 'i'm dropping.'
give it to friends if they ask but some people just flat-out don't care beyond 'i'm dropping.'
fuuuuuck everyone who's too omg no!!! ~ intimidated ~ to bother with ooc communication.
if you are directly asked a question about your character, or about your time or inclination to do a thread or a plot: answer it. if you have very strong feelings on an issue, mention them. is this behavior so foreign to the average rper? i'm not even kidding, did i miss some kind of memo that vocalizing your actual thoughts or intentions is b a d?
because i feel as if with half the people i play, i have to either hold their hands until the poor bbs can s-stammer out their thoughts 5rljewuihqwhjk .//. , or hope i finally develop telepathy.
if you are directly asked a question about your character, or about your time or inclination to do a thread or a plot: answer it. if you have very strong feelings on an issue, mention them. is this behavior so foreign to the average rper? i'm not even kidding, did i miss some kind of memo that vocalizing your actual thoughts or intentions is b a d?
because i feel as if with half the people i play, i have to either hold their hands until the poor bbs can s-stammer out their thoughts 5rljewuihqwhjk .//. , or hope i finally develop telepathy.
and since the irony of my posting this anon just hit me, i'll be sure to put together a kink list before i return to fucking that chicken.
and fuuuuuuuck everyone who has ever responded rudely to polite ooc communication because they were anxious or didn't get their way or couldn't handle mild disapproval. also fuck anyone who contributes to creating atmospheres that would make the average person uncomfortable about ooc communication. (not talking about wg. talking about arbitrary dismissal of characters/fandoms without playing with them. i don't like most lokis or any kingdom hearts, but i'm not going to do shit that makes them feel like they can't play unless there's an issue with that person's rping. then it's crit time.)
this hobby could use fewer assholes.
this hobby could use fewer assholes.
this is such a problem for me too... i've stopped playing smut with people i don't know because i got sick of all the infantile behavior. people are so desperate for validation and cozies that planning a thread has become something scary.
I know it's plurk and I can just scroll right on past it, but for fuck's sake, it gets tiring when every single one of your plurks are self-pitying cries for attention. case in point:
"TMW you confirm, yet again, that most of the people you're threading with have found newer, shinier threads that they like better because you suck and no one likes playing with you. /headdesk"
Even though she latched onto my character the second I joined and so my CR calls for me to be in on her 20 million plots, I'm seriously close to ridding my plurk list of her, or at least unfollowing her. I can't believe this needy, insecure bitch is supposedly a professional writer and older than me.
"TMW you confirm, yet again, that most of the people you're threading with have found newer, shinier threads that they like better because you suck and no one likes playing with you. /headdesk"
Even though she latched onto my character the second I joined and so my CR calls for me to be in on her 20 million plots, I'm seriously close to ridding my plurk list of her, or at least unfollowing her. I can't believe this needy, insecure bitch is supposedly a professional writer and older than me.
A bit late in the post but whatever
Re: KINKS YOU WOULD NEVER ADMIT TO HAVING WHILE LOGGED IN
(Anonymous) 2013-01-23 04:41 pm (UTC)(link)knotting :(
that omegaverse bullshit is not what i like, either, so all the shitty fanfic pandering to this particular kink is pretty unappealing
that omegaverse bullshit is not what i like, either, so all the shitty fanfic pandering to this particular kink is pretty unappealing
Re: KINKS YOU WOULD NEVER ADMIT TO HAVING WHILE LOGGED IN
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-23 16:46 (UTC) - ExpandRe: KINKS YOU WOULD NEVER ADMIT TO HAVING WHILE LOGGED IN
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-23 17:03 (UTC) - ExpandRe: KINKS YOU WOULD NEVER ADMIT TO HAVING WHILE LOGGED IN
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-23 18:56 (UTC) - ExpandRe: KINKS YOU WOULD NEVER ADMIT TO HAVING WHILE LOGGED IN
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-23 17:00 (UTC) - ExpandRe: KINKS YOU WOULD NEVER ADMIT TO HAVING WHILE LOGGED IN
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-23 17:04 (UTC) - ExpandRe: KINKS YOU WOULD NEVER ADMIT TO HAVING WHILE LOGGED IN
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-23 17:32 (UTC) - ExpandRe: KINKS YOU WOULD NEVER ADMIT TO HAVING WHILE LOGGED IN
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-23 18:54 (UTC) - ExpandRe: KINKS YOU WOULD NEVER ADMIT TO HAVING WHILE LOGGED IN
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-23 17:59 (UTC) - ExpandRe: KINKS YOU WOULD NEVER ADMIT TO HAVING WHILE LOGGED IN
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-23 18:09 (UTC) - ExpandRe: KINKS YOU WOULD NEVER ADMIT TO HAVING WHILE LOGGED IN
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-23 18:12 (UTC) - ExpandRe: KINKS YOU WOULD NEVER ADMIT TO HAVING WHILE LOGGED IN
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-23 18:11 (UTC) - ExpandRe: KINKS YOU WOULD NEVER ADMIT TO HAVING WHILE LOGGED IN
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-24 01:45 (UTC) - ExpandRe: KINKS YOU WOULD NEVER ADMIT TO HAVING WHILE LOGGED IN
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-23 18:23 (UTC) - ExpandRe: KINKS YOU WOULD NEVER ADMIT TO HAVING WHILE LOGGED IN
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-23 19:54 (UTC) - ExpandRe: KINKS YOU WOULD NEVER ADMIT TO HAVING WHILE LOGGED IN
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-23 18:55 (UTC) - ExpandRe: KINKS YOU WOULD NEVER ADMIT TO HAVING WHILE LOGGED IN
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-23 19:46 (UTC) - ExpandRe: KINKS YOU WOULD NEVER ADMIT TO HAVING WHILE LOGGED IN
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-24 01:47 (UTC) - ExpandRe: KINKS YOU WOULD NEVER ADMIT TO HAVING WHILE LOGGED IN
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-24 20:24 (UTC) - ExpandRe: KINKS YOU WOULD NEVER ADMIT TO HAVING WHILE LOGGED IN
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-23 20:04 (UTC) - ExpandRe: KINKS YOU WOULD NEVER ADMIT TO HAVING WHILE LOGGED IN
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-23 22:12 (UTC) - ExpandRe: KINKS YOU WOULD NEVER ADMIT TO HAVING WHILE LOGGED IN
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-24 02:50 (UTC) - Expandevery time i see someone namedropped on here, i know it's time to ready the popcorn and tab back to plurk.
never fails.
i don't understand what the point of throwing a shitfit over there is when people talk crap about you on here. it just makes you look like a gigantic baby. learn to wade through the insults until you get some crit you can use to better yourself ffs.
never fails.
i don't understand what the point of throwing a shitfit over there is when people talk crap about you on here. it just makes you look like a gigantic baby. learn to wade through the insults until you get some crit you can use to better yourself ffs.
looks like mike's back
I was about to say there wasn't enough dick for it to be Mike, but then... yeah.
didn't know if this should go under game or plurk pet peeves
(Anonymous) 2013-01-23 05:58 pm (UTC)(link)Dear friend,
It's nice that you're playing the same character I do, honest! More people need to play him. But that doesn't mean I want to discuss his thoughts/feelings or your "playing philosophy" or whatever. It doesn't even mean that I'm interested in what's going on with YOUR guy so stop linking me to your shit! Nothing personal, I just don't care to read outside of my games.
anon because I know you'll take it the wrong fucking way if I ever tell you this to your face
It's nice that you're playing the same character I do, honest! More people need to play him. But that doesn't mean I want to discuss his thoughts/feelings or your "playing philosophy" or whatever. It doesn't even mean that I'm interested in what's going on with YOUR guy so stop linking me to your shit! Nothing personal, I just don't care to read outside of my games.
anon because I know you'll take it the wrong fucking way if I ever tell you this to your face
I hate jrp's overshare culture. can't we just play our own characters without splooging unsolicited feels all over each other
Re: didn't know if this should go under game or plurk pet peeves
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-23 18:36 (UTC) - ExpandRe: didn't know if this should go under game or plurk pet peeves
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-23 19:06 (UTC) - ExpandRe: didn't know if this should go under game or plurk pet peeves
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-23 20:06 (UTC) - ExpandRe: didn't know if this should go under game or plurk pet peeves
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-23 19:11 (UTC) - ExpandRe: didn't know if this should go under game or plurk pet peeves
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-23 21:18 (UTC) - Expandi don't think i get the joke
is that because you live your life on tumblr and actually think that the original comment was a good point?
it must hurt to be that obtuse
it must hurt to be that obtuse
Someone on my Plurk list is having a rage fit because some people have misconceptions about dinosaurs
I can't even
I can't even
I'm starting to think there's one CFUD/ECATS anon around here who just cannot handle anyone they have on plurk. First Zero, then Ry, now Heebee. Either unfollow or rinse some of that sand out of your cunt. She's passionate about the subject but not flying off the handle. And it's not like she's a wanker of any kind, mute it and move on. Ass.
remember when everyone thought elf was pretentious and creepy because she did those "postmortems" of her smut threads
then everyone was okay with her for a while
and now i guess everybody hates her again or something
but mostly i just remember everyone mocking the postmortems
then everyone was okay with her for a while
and now i guess everybody hates her again or something
but mostly i just remember everyone mocking the postmortems
reading some old threads in an old, dead game and seeing so much of this shit:
Character A had heard about the problems his friend Character B was having and wanted to check up on him, so he headed in that direction.
or
Character 1 entered the room, looking for someone to answer his question.
Character 2 was behind a piece of furniture and not visible to anyone. he was asleep but his magic ninja training alerted him that someone was here so he woke up!
in this case it's not even IC for Character 2 to be a dick and just hide in the shadows to watch people, he's polite and helpful so it makes no sense for him to know somebody's there and just ignore them
in both cases, why can't either of you just ENGAGE THE OTHER PLAYERS IN YOUR SCENES
why can't Character A walk up to the door of his friend's apartment and knock, why can't Character 2 come out from behind his bookcase or whatever and ask the other character what's up
would it kill you people to do something to move the scene forward a little instead of padding it out with a bunch of posts of people doing nothing
and don't get me started on the logs that have 7519266 lines of character smiling and nodding and giving two and three word responses to each other
Character A had heard about the problems his friend Character B was having and wanted to check up on him, so he headed in that direction.
or
Character 1 entered the room, looking for someone to answer his question.
Character 2 was behind a piece of furniture and not visible to anyone. he was asleep but his magic ninja training alerted him that someone was here so he woke up!
in this case it's not even IC for Character 2 to be a dick and just hide in the shadows to watch people, he's polite and helpful so it makes no sense for him to know somebody's there and just ignore them
in both cases, why can't either of you just ENGAGE THE OTHER PLAYERS IN YOUR SCENES
why can't Character A walk up to the door of his friend's apartment and knock, why can't Character 2 come out from behind his bookcase or whatever and ask the other character what's up
would it kill you people to do something to move the scene forward a little instead of padding it out with a bunch of posts of people doing nothing
and don't get me started on the logs that have 7519266 lines of character smiling and nodding and giving two and three word responses to each other
in the first case, maybe it's because they didn't want to post a closed log and wanted to give players other than character b's mun the chance to catch character a on his journey and engage with him for a while?
i see the rest of what you're saying, but sometimes you want to make an open post... more open.
i see the rest of what you're saying, but sometimes you want to make an open post... more open.
mine is that paradisa is a shitty wankhole. it all happened in this thread (http://rpanoncomm.livejournal.com/12737.html?thread=111794625#t111794625) from nearly two years ago, but i think it's kinda why paradisa is, from what i've read, dying today. literally no one sane wanted to apply there after that exploded. it was, by far, the second biggest wanksplosion i saw after zodion's rapetrolling/zodion in general.
Oh man, I remember that; I was in the game at that time and just watching the thread grow with the distinct feeling of "this is going to look so bad."
dhem icons
Page 4 of 4