Re: da

(Anonymous) 2023-04-29 04:04 am (UTC)(link)
tbh i find it weird people keep saying this when the person who posted pastebin proof that jigokucho was gsai's game (which was the thing that made everything that followed even possible) did so on wg

yes wg is irrelevant, but way to use the worst example to prove it

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2023-05-01 02:57 am (UTC)(link)
anyone who says wg is irrelevant has never heard of second or het

iirc tora also suffered irl consequences as a direct result of trying to use wg to get luc expelled from the art college they both attended

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2023-05-01 02:59 am (UTC)(link)
"anyone who says wg is irrelevant has never heard of sour crusty years-moldering infighting dramas a, b, and c"

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2023-05-01 03:06 am (UTC)(link)
second was grooming an actual irl child to be the provider of her underage self-abuse kink. that's a world away from 'years-moldering infighting drama'.

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2023-05-01 03:09 am (UTC)(link)
my point was more that relevancy kind of goes hand in hand with recency

all this shit happened years ago, it doesnt make it relevant just because wg is constantly huffing its own farts trying to relive its glory days

sa

(Anonymous) 2023-05-01 03:11 am (UTC)(link)
also weird to see wg anons jerk themselves off over second

pretty sure all we did was run them out of dwrp

they still got to groom a child we didnt do shit

Re: sa

(Anonymous) 2023-05-01 03:24 am (UTC)(link)
so what you are saying is, you would prefer for there to be both no wankgate, and more known and tolerated child predators in dwrp. extremely gonsai position to take, especially when posting it on wankgate. excited to see how it works out for you.

Re: sa

(Anonymous) - 2023-05-01 03:25 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2023-05-01 03:44 (UTC) - Expand

Re: sa

(Anonymous) - 2023-05-01 03:50 (UTC) - Expand

Re: sa

(Anonymous) - 2023-05-01 03:53 (UTC) - Expand

Re: sa

(Anonymous) - 2023-05-01 03:55 (UTC) - Expand

Re: sa

(Anonymous) - 2023-05-01 03:57 (UTC) - Expand

Re: sa

(Anonymous) - 2023-05-01 04:01 (UTC) - Expand

Re: sa

(Anonymous) - 2023-05-01 04:03 (UTC) - Expand

Re: sa

(Anonymous) - 2023-05-01 04:10 (UTC) - Expand

Re: sa

(Anonymous) - 2023-05-01 04:12 (UTC) - Expand

Re: sa

(Anonymous) - 2023-05-01 04:15 (UTC) - Expand

Re: sa

(Anonymous) - 2023-05-01 04:16 (UTC) - Expand

+1

(Anonymous) - 2023-05-01 06:11 (UTC) - Expand

da

(Anonymous) - 2023-05-01 04:14 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2023-05-01 04:17 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2023-05-01 04:18 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2023-05-01 04:23 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2023-05-01 04:57 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2023-05-01 03:29 am (UTC)(link)
I have bad news about how long ago second/het/tora drama was.

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2023-05-01 03:39 am (UTC)(link)
Like I think all three of those wanks happened before Trump got elected so it's closer to 10 years than 5.

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2023-05-01 05:05 am (UTC)(link)
> "wank x happened x years ago so anyone who brings up that i did it is just grudgewanking and bringing up moldy old wank!"
> /proceeds to re-enact wank x endlessly out of pathological inability to learn or grow as a person
> /proceeds to loudly insist that wg doesn't matter and never did which has nothing to do with my decade-long wank x deets posted here, i swear


lmao. lol even

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2023-05-01 01:55 pm (UTC)(link)
"nobody but gsai could POSSIBLY think im cringe and fail"

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2023-05-01 01:58 pm (UTC)(link)
not ayrt, but yes, this is true

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2023-05-01 02:03 pm (UTC)(link)
using fail as an adjective in 2023

do you still glomp people too

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2023-05-01 14:12 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2023-05-01 03:32 am (UTC)(link)
could you come up with a good example of a wanker that was ousted! and defeated! solely thanks to wankgate that happened in 2022-2023 or...?

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2023-05-01 03:52 am (UTC)(link)
how would it be possible for something like that to happen "solely" on wankgate?

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2023-05-01 04:17 am (UTC)(link)
almost like that was their point

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2023-05-01 04:24 am (UTC)(link)
you guys are just being dumb now. you can't just slot things in and out of communities like books on a shelf. you could still have pancakes with no eggs, but they'd be different than the pancakes with eggs. you could still have music with no saxophone, but it's different than the music with saxophone. you could still have a movie where nobody says anything mean to each other, but it's a different movie, with different characters, than the one where characters do say mean things to each other.

the dwrp without wankgate is a different dwrp. "better" or "worse" don't make sense here, because what you are describing, foundationally, is a community built and operated by different people than the people that built the community you are in. if that's the community you want, why don't you go build it?

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2023-05-01 04:27 am (UTC)(link)
you're putting so much effort into not confronting that youve been throwing your back into a mean girls burn book for legbeards instead of the virtuous rp police force keeping out the undesirables

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2023-05-01 04:29 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2023-05-01 04:40 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2023-05-01 08:12 am (UTC)(link)
nobody cared that g was the secret head mod

they cared when the game started to fuck itself in the mouth

g was outed as the head mod long before that and the players either didn't know who that was, didn't pay attention, or didn't care

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2023-05-01 11:48 am (UTC)(link)
you're right. multiple players tried to bring it up to the mods because no one cared

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2023-05-01 01:02 pm (UTC)(link)
someday we'll learn that "no one" is colloquially hyperbolic, but until then



you cared, anon. and you're a hero

da

(Anonymous) 2023-05-01 01:20 pm (UTC)(link)
shut the fuck up gsai

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2023-05-01 01:34 pm (UTC)(link)
you didn't do well in school

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2023-05-01 13:57 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2023-05-01 06:19 pm (UTC)(link)
i figured the pastebin proof was posted to wg because rpa doesn't allow leaks of private plurks

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2023-05-01 06:42 pm (UTC)(link)
so









theres a purpose for wg